Vitreous pp 241-263 | Cite as

III.B. Anomalous Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Vitreoschisis

Chapter

Abstract

Alterations in the molecular composition, organization, and structure of the human vitreous are an inevitable consequence of aging. Complete and innocuous posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is the most common ultimate consequence of vitreous aging [see chapter II.C. Vitreous aging and PVD], but this can often be disturbed by anomalies in this complex process. Insufficient dehiscence at the vitreoretinal interface, excessive gel liquefaction, or both can result in an anomalous PVD (APVD), sometimes associated with vitreoschisis (VS), which is a lamellar split in the posterior vitreous cortex. APVD and VS are associated with different clinical pathologies. A detailed analysis of vitreous pathophysiology that leads to APVD and VS will enable a better understanding of vitreoretinal disease pathogenesis, improve diagnostic acumen, and provide new directions for therapeutic approaches that will ultimately lead to effective preventative strategies.

Keywords

Vitreous Vitreoretinal interface Hyalocytes Aging Liquefaction Vitreoretinal dehiscence Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) Anomalous PVD Vitreomacular traction Vitreo-papillary adhesion Vitreoschisis Macular hole Macular pucker 

Supplementary material

305359_1_En_14_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (12.1 mb)
Video III.B-1 Multifocal Vitreomacular Traction (VMT). Due to anomalous posterior vitreous detachment, the full-thickness posterior vitreous cortex does not separate from the retina and pulls anteriorly. Three separate foci of vitreoretinal traction can be identified, the largest at the macula. Vitreomacular traction is so severe that the macula is considerably elevated disturbing central vision (Courtesy of Carl Glittenberg, MD, and Prof Susanne Binder). (AVI 131278 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Schmut O, Mallinger R, Paschke E. Studies on a distinct fraction of bovine vitreous body collagen. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1984;221(6):286–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scott JE, Chen Y, Brass A. Secondary and tertiary structures involving chondroitin and chondroitin sulphates in solution, investigated by rotary shadowing/electron microscopy and computer simulation. Eur J Biochem. 1992;209(2):675–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sebag J. Vitreous anatomy, aging, and anomalous posterior vitreous detachment. In: Dartt DA, editor. Encyclopedia of the eye. Oxford: Academic Press; 2010. p. 307–15.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Itakura H, Kishi S, Li D, Akiyama H. Observation of posterior precortical vitreous pocket using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shimada H, Hirose T, Yamamoto A, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, Yuzawa M. Depiction of the vitreous pocket by optical coherence tomography. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(1):51–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kakehashi A, Kado M, Akiba J, Hirokawa H. Biomicroscopic findings of premacular posterior vitreous. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995;99(3):323–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamei A, Totani A. Isolation and characterization of minor glycosaminoglycans in the rabbit vitreous body. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982;109(3):881–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akiba J, Ueno N, Chakrabarti B. Age-related changes in the molecular properties of vitreous collagen. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12(10):951–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown D, Hamdi H, Bahri S, Kenney MC. Characterization of an endogenous metalloproteinase in human vitreous. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13(9):639–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown DJ, Bishop P, Hamdi H, Kenney MC. Cleavage of structural components of mammalian vitreous by endogenous matrix metalloproteinase-2. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15(4):439–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Los LI, van der Worp RJ, van Luyn MJ, Hooymans JM. Age-related liquefaction of the human vitreous body: LM and TEM evaluation of the role of proteoglycans and collagen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(7):2828–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aguayo J, Glaser B, Mildvan A, Cheng HM, Gonzalez RG, Brady T. Study of vitreous liquefaction by NMR spectroscopy and imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(5):692–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snowden JM. The stabilization of in vivo assembled collagen fibrils by proteoglycans/glycosaminoglycans. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982;703(1):21–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi M, Jalkh A, Hoskins J, Trempe CL, Schepens CL. Biomicroscopic evaluation and photography of liquefied vitreous in some vitreoretinal disorders. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(9):1555–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldmann H. Senile changes of the lens and the vitreous. The Arthur J. Bedell lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;57:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sebag J. Age-related changes in human vitreous structure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225(2):89–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sebag J. Age-related differences in the human vitreoretinal interface. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(7):966–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sebag J. Anatomy and pathology of the vitreo-retinal interface. Eye (Lond). 1992;6(Pt 6):541–52.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith RE, Ganley JP. Ophthalmic survey of a community. 1. Abnormalities of the ocular fundus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(6):1126–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teng CC, Katzin HM. An anatomic study of the periphery of the retina. I. Nonpigmented epithelial cell proliferation and hole formation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1951;34(9):1237–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang J, McLeod D, Henson DB, Bishop PN. Age-dependent changes in the basal retinovitreous adhesion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(5):1793–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sebag J. Vitreous base. The vitreous: structure, function, and pathobiology. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 39–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sebag J, Hageman GS. Interfaces. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000;10(1):1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gartner J. Electron microscopic observations on the cilio-zonular border area of the human eye with particular reference to the aging changes. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1970;131(3):263–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sebag J. The vitreous – structure, function, and pathobiology. New York: Springer; 1989Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sebag J. Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(8):690–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balazs EA, Denlinger JL. Aging changes in the vitreous. In: Sekuler R, Kline D, Dismukes K, editors. Aging and human visual function. New York: Liss; 1982. p. 45–57.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eisner G. Posterior vitreous detachment. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1989;194(5):389–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Foos RY, Wheeler NC. Vitreoretinal juncture. Synchysis senilis and posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(12):1502–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kishi S, Hagimura N, Shimizu K. The role of the premacular liquefied pocket and premacular vitreous cortex in idiopathic macular hole development. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122(5):622–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Larsson L, Osterlin S. Posterior vitreous detachment. A combined clinical and physiochemical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1985;223(2):92–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson MW. Posterior vitreous detachment: evolution and complications of its early stages. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(3):371–82 e1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kishi S, Demaria C, Shimizu K. Vitreous cortex remnants at the fovea after spontaneous vitreous detachment. Int Ophthalmol. 1986;9(4):253–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arzabe CW, Akiba J, Jalkh AE, Quiroz MA, Trempe CL, McMeel JW, et al. Comparative study of vitreoretinal relationships using biomicroscopy and ultrasound. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(1):66–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kicova N, Bertelmann T, Irle S, Sekundo W, Mennel S. Evaluation of a posterior vitreous detachment: a comparison of biomicroscopy, B-scan ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography to surgical findings with chromodissection. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(4):e264–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mamou J, Aristizabal O, Silverman RH, Ketterling JA, Turnbull DH. High-frequency chirp ultrasound imaging with an annular array for ophthalmologic and small-animal imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(7):1198–208.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oksala A. Ultrasonic findings in the vitreous body at various ages. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978;207(4):275–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spaide RF. Measurement of the posterior precortical vitreous pocket in fellow eyes with posterior vitreous detachment and macular holes. Retina. 2003;23(4):481–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walton KA, Meyer CH, Harkrider CJ, Cox TA, Toth CA. Age-related changes in vitreous mobility as measured by video B scan ultrasound. Exp Eye Res. 2002;74(2):173–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zimmerman RL. In vivo measurements of the viscoelasticity of the human vitreous humor. Biophys J. 1980;29(3):539–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Silverman RH, Ketterling JA, Mamou J, Coleman DJ. Improved high-resolution ultrasonic imaging of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(1):94–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silverman RH, Ketterling JA, Mamou J, Lloyd HO, Filoux E, Coleman DJ. Pulse-encoded ultrasound imaging of the vitreous with an annular array. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43(1):82–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barak Y, Ihnen MA, Schaal S. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and management of vitreoretinal interface pathologies. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:876472.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Folgar FA, Toth CA, DeCroos FC, Girach A, Pakola S, Jaffe GJ. Assessment of retinal morphology with spectral and time domain OCT in the phase III trials of enzymatic vitreolysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7395–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gallemore RP, Jumper JM, McCuen 2nd BW, Jaffe GJ, Postel EA, Toth CA. Diagnosis of vitreoretinal adhesions in macular disease with optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2000;20(2):115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hillenkamp J, Kraus J, Framme C, Jackson TL, Roider J, Gabel VP, et al. Retreatment of full-thickness macular hole: predictive value of optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1445–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gupta P, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Multifocal retinal contraction in macular pucker analyzed by combined optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Retina. 2008;28(3):447–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Koizumi H, Spaide RF, Fisher YL, Freund KB, Klancnik Jr JM, Yannuzzi LA. Three-dimensional evaluation of vitreomacular traction and epiretinal membrane using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(3):509–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Le Rouic JF, Rispoli M. Vitreomacular interface alteration: a new semiology with en face optical coherence tomography. In: Lumbroso B, Huang D, Romano A, Rispoli M, Coscas G, editors. Clinical enface OCT atlas. New York: Jaypee Brothers; 2013. p. 355–65.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sebag J, Gupta P, Rosen RR, Garcia P, Sadun AA. Macular holes and macular pucker: the role of vitreoschisis as imaged by optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:121–9. discussion 9–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Itakura H, Kishi S. Aging changes of vitreomacular interface. Retina. 2011;31(7):1400–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Itakura H, Kishi S. Evolution of vitreomacular detachment in healthy subjects. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1348–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mojana F, Kozak I, Oster SF, Cheng L, Bartsch DU, Brar M, et al. Observations by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography combined with simultaneous scanning laser ophthalmoscopy: imaging of the vitreous. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):641–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grulkowski I, Liu JJ, Potsaid B, Jayaraman V, Lu CD, Jiang J, et al. Retinal, anterior segment and full eye imaging using ultrahigh speed swept source OCT with vertical-cavity surface emitting lasers. Biomed Opt Express. 2012;3(11):2733–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Liu JJ, Grulkowski I, Kraus MF, Potsaid B, Lu CD, Baumann B, et al. In vivo imaging of the rodent eye with swept source/Fourier domain OCT. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4(2):351–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hilding AC. Normal vitreous, its attachments and dynamics during ocular movement. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954;52(4):497–514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hilding AC. Alterations in the form, movement, and structure of the vitreous body in aphakic eyes. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954;52(5):699–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Osterlin S. Macromolecular composition of the vitreous in the aphakic owl monkey eye. Exp Eye Res. 1978;26(1):77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Osterlin S. Changes in the molecular morphology of the vitreous after intraocular surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 1970;48(4):829.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kawano SI, Honda Y, Negi A. Effects of biological stimuli on the viscosity of the vitreous. Acta Ophthalmol. 1982;60(6):977–91.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Osterlin S. Changes in the vitreous with age. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975;95(3):372–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gregor Z, Ryan SJ. Combined posterior contusion and penetrating injury in the pig eye. II. Histological features. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66(12):799–804.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Heller MD, Straatsma BR, Foos RY. Detachment of the posterior vitreous in phakic and aphakic eyes. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1972;10:23–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McDonnell PJ, Patel A, Green WR. Comparison of intracapsular and extracapsular cataract surgery. Histopathologic study of eyes obtained postmortem. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(9):1208–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hauer Y, Barkay S. Vitreous detachment in aphakic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1964;48:341–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jaffe NS, Light DS. Vitreous changes produced by cataract surgery. A study of 1,058 aphakic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;76(4):541–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Foos RY. Posterior vitreous detachment. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972;76(2):480–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Akiba J. Prevalence of posterior vitreous detachment in high myopia. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(9):1384–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Weber-Krause B, Eckardt C. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment in the elderly. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94(9):619–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kobayashi H, Ogino N. Incidence of posterior detachment in healthy eyes with age, sex and refraction as variables. Rinsho Ganka. 1985;39:514–5.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hayreh SS, Jonas JB. Posterior vitreous detachment: clinical correlations. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(5):333–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shao L, Xu L, You QS, Wang YX, Chen CX, Yang H, et al. Prevalence and associations of incomplete posterior vitreous detachment in adult Chinese: the Beijing Eye study. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58498.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    You QS, Peng XY, Xu L, Chen CX, Wang YX, Jonas JB. Myopic maculopathy imaged by optical coherence tomography: the Beijing Eye study. Ophthalmology. 2013;16.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cox MS, Schepens CL, Freeman HM. Retinal detachment due to ocular contusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;76(5):678–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Massicotte SJ, Folberg R, Torczynski E, Gilliland MG, Luckenbach MW. Vitreoretinal traction and perimacular retinal folds in the eyes of deliberately traumatized children. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1124–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Winthrop SR, Cleary PE, Minckler DS, Ryan SJ. Penetrating eye injuries: a histopathological review. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64(11):809–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Faulborn J, Topping TM. Proliferations in the vitreous cavity after perforating injuries. A histopathological study. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978;205(3):157–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cleary PE, Ryan SJ. Histology of wound, vitreous, and retina in experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88(2):221–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Abrams GW, Topping TM, Machemer R. Vitrectomy for injury: the effect on intraocular proliferation following perforation of the posterior segment of the rabbit eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(4):743–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cleary PE, Ryan SJ. Vitrectomy in penetrating eye injury. Results of a controlled trial of vitrectomy in an experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(2):287–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Spalding SC, Sternberg Jr P. Controversies in the management of posterior segment ocular trauma. Retina. 1990;10 Suppl 1:S76–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gregor Z, Ryan SJ. Complete and core vitrectomies in the treatment of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. II. Histologic features. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(3):446–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Miller B, Miller H, Patterson R, Ryan SJ. Effect of the vitreous on retinal wound-healing. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1986;224(6):576–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Snead MP, Yates JR. Clinical and molecular genetics of Stickler syndrome. J Med Genet. 1999;36(5):353–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sebag J, Buckingham B, Charles MA, Reiser K. Biochemical abnormalities in vitreous of humans with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(10):1472–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sebag J. Abnormalities of human vitreous structure in diabetes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231(5):257–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sebag J. Diabetic vitreopathy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):205–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Streeten BA. Disorders of the vitreous. In: Garner A, Klintworth GK, editors. Pathobiology of the ocular disease – a dynamic approach. New York/Basel: Marcel Dekker; 1982. p. 1381–419.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Foos RY. Tears of the peripheral retina; pathogenesis, incidence and classification in autopsy eyes. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1975;15:68–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Machemer R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. XLI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(6):681–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sigelman J. Vitreous base classification of retinal tears: clinical application. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;25(2):59–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Halpern JI. Routine screening of the retinal periphery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62(1):99–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Byer NE. Clinical study of retinal breaks. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1967;71(3):461–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Rutnin U, Schepens CL. Fundus appearance in normal eyes. II. The standard peripheral fundus and developmental variations. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64(5):840–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Boniuk M, Butler FC. An autopsy study of lattice degeneration, retinal breaks, and retinal pits. In: McPherson A, editor. New and controversial aspects of retinal detachment. New York: Hoeber; 1968.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Spencer LM, Foos RY. Paravascular vitreoretinal attachments. Role in retinal tears. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970;84(5):557–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Barishak YR, Stein R. Retinal breaks without retinal detachment in autopsy eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1972;50(2):147–59.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Byer NE. The natural history of asymptomatic retinal breaks. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(9):1033–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Neumann E, Hyams S. Conservative management of retinal breaks. A follow-up study of subsequent retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(6):482–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100(2):289–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Bohringer HR. Statistics on the frequency and risks on retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica. 1956;131(4–5):331–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Kramer SG, Benson WE. Prophylactic therapy of retinal breaks. Surv Ophthalmol. 1977;22(1):41–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Combs JL, Welch RB. Retinal breaks without detachment: natural history, management and long term follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982;80:64–97.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    DiBernardo C, Blodi B, Byrne SF. Echographic evaluation of retinal tears in patients with spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(4):511–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sarrafizadeh R, Hassan TS, Ruby AJ, Williams GA, Garretson BR, Capone Jr A, et al. Incidence of retinal detachment and visual outcome in eyes presenting with posterior vitreous separation and dense fundus-obscuring vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2273–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, de Smet MD, Gaudric A, Reichel E, Sadda SR, Sebag J, Spaide RF, Stalmans P. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;17.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Stalmans P, Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Heier JS, Dugel PU, Gandorfer A, Sebag J, Haller JA. OCT-based interpretation of the vitreomacular interface and indications for pharmacologic vitreolysis. Retina. 2013;33(10):2003–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Krebs I, Brannath W, Glittenberg C, Zeiler F, Sebag J, Binder S. Posterior vitreomacular adhesion: a potential risk factor for exudative age-related macular degeneration? Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(5):741–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Robison CD, Krebs I, Binder S, Barbazetto IA, Kotsolis AI, Yannuzzi LA, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Vitreomacular adhesion in active and end-stage age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(1):79–82 e2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mayr-Sponer U, Waldstein SM, Kundi M, Ritter M, Golbaz I, Heiling U, et al. Influence of the vitreomacular interface on outcomes of Ranibizumab therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2620–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Uney GO, Unlu N, Acar MA, Hazirolan D, Altiparmak UE, Yalniz-Akkaya Z, et al. Role of posterior vitreous detachment on outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2014;34:32–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Bottos J, Elizalde J, Arevalo JF, Rodrigues EB, Maia M. Vitreomacular traction syndrome. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012;7(2):148–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wang MY, Nguyen D, Hindoyan N, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Vitreo-papillary adhesion in macular hole and macular pucker. Retina. 2009;29(5):644–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Haouchine B, Massin P, Gaudric A. Foveal pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation: a prospective study by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(1):15–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Chu TG, Lopez PF, Cano MR, Freeman WR, Lean JS, Liggett PE, et al. Posterior vitreoschisis. An echographic finding in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):315–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Schwatz SD, Alexander R, Hiscott P, Gregor ZJ. Recognition of vitreoschisis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A useful landmark in vitrectomy for diabetic traction retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):323–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sebag J. Vitreoschisis in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):8455–6. author reply 6–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Gupta P, Yee KM, Garcia P, Rosen RB, Parikh J, Hageman GS, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Vitreoschisis in macular diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):376–80.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sebag J, Wang MY, Nguyen D, Sadun AA. Vitreopapillary adhesion in macular diseases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;107:35–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zhao F, Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Scheler R, Schaumberger MM, Kampik A, et al. Epiretinal cell proliferation in macular pucker and vitreomacular traction syndrome: analysis of flat-mounted internal limiting membrane specimens. Retina. 2013;33(1):77–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Haritoglou C, Reiniger IW, Schaumberger M, Gass CA, Priglinger SG, Kampik A. Five-year follow-up of macular hole surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane: update of a prospective study. Retina. 2006;26(6):618–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Johnson RN, Gass JD. Idiopathic macular holes. Observations, stages of formation, and implications for surgical intervention. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(7):917–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Gartner J. Electron-microscopic study on the fibrillar network and fibrocyte–collagen interactions in the vitreous cortex at the ora serrata of human eyes with special regard to the role of disintegrating cells. Exp Eye Res. 1986;42(1):21–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sebag J. Vitreous: the resplendent enigma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(8):989–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Smiddy WE, Green WR, Michels RG, de la Cruz Z. Ultrastructural studies of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107(2):177–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Sebag J, Balazs EA. Morphology and ultrastructure of human vitreous fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1867–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Faulborn J, Ardjomand N. Tractional retinoschisis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a histopathologic study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238:40–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Sebag
    • 1
    • 2
  • Moritz Niemeyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael J. Koss
    • 3
    • 2
  1. 1.VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula RetinaHuntington BeachUSA
  2. 2.Doheny Eye InstituteLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyRupprecht Karls UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations