Advertisement

The Psychological Science of Spending Money

  • Travis J. CarterEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the psychological research related to the act of spending money, with the aim of understanding the underlying psychological processes involved. To that end, the emotions involved in spending money before, during, and after the money changes hands are explored, including the role of anticipated and anticipatory emotions, different orientations to the gains and losses inherent in an act of spending, and the process of hedonic adaptation. Additionally, given how fundamental choice is to the act of spending money, factors that influence the decision-making process are discussed, including the role that comparative processes and expectations play in the process of making decisions and evaluating their outcomes. In each case, particular attention is paid to the psychological forces that influence the ultimate goal underlying any act of spending: happiness. Finally, several concrete strategies for making purchases most likely to lead to success on this goal are identified, including purchasing experiences over possessions, spending pro-socially, and making meaningful purchases.

Keywords

Credit Card Purchase Decision Material Possession Subjective Happiness Scale Tangible Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahuvia, A. (2008). If money doesn’t make us happy, why do we act as if it does? Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 491–507. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. doi: 10.1037/a0031578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. (A. H. Kemp, Ed.). PLoS One, 7(6), 1–4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039211.g002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., & Dunn, E. W. (2009). From wealth to well-being? Money matters, but less than people think. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 523–527. doi: 10.1080/17439760903271421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 2–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrade, E. B., & Ariely, D. (2009). The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233–248. doi: 10.1086/314322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 134–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ariely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man’s search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(3–4), 671–677. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arkes, H., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10. doi: 10.2307/30163364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1287/opre.33.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger, J., Draganska, M., & Simonson, I. (2007). The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Science, 26(4), 460–472. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2006). When choosing is not deciding: The effect of perceived responsibility on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 211–219. doi: 10.1086/506302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., Banks, J., Clark, A. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (2013). Money, well-being, and loss aversion: Does an income loss have a greater effect on well-being than an equivalent income gain? Psychological Science, 24(12), 2557–2562. doi: 10.1177/0956797613496436.
  19. Brown, S., Taylor, K., & Price, S. W. (2005). Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 642–663. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buehler, R., & McFarland, C. (2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1480–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199–215. doi: 10.1037/a0030953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. The Journal of Consumer Research, 27(12), 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1086/374701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carter, T. J. (2013). The abstract and concrete nature of experiences and possessions. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 146–159. doi: 10.1037/a0017145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2012). I am what I do, not what I have: The differential centrality of experiential and material purchases to the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1304–1317. doi: 10.1037/a0027407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2013). Getting the most for the money: The hedonic return on experiential and material purchases. In M. Tatzel (Ed.), Consumption and well-being in the material world. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7368-4_3.Google Scholar
  28. Chancellor, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Happiness and thrift: When (spending) less is (hedonically) more. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chernev, A. (2003). Product assortment and individual decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 151–162. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). The costs and benefits of consuming. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 267–272. doi: 10.1086/314324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (1999). Comparison effects on preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 293–306. doi: 10.1086/209564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?: A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 926–935. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276. doi: 10.1037/a0030487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. doi: 10.1126/science.1150952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Happy money. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  41. Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 553–561. doi: 10.1086/599764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5(3), 152–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 227–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gilovich, T. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1110–1126. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Gilovich, T., Kerr, M., & Medvec, V. H. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 552–560. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Goldstein, R., Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Emerson, J. W., Herschkowitsch, A., & Katz, J. (2008). Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Griffin, J. G., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2010). The slippery slope: The impact of feature alignability on search and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Griffin, D. W., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. D. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1128–1139. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. doi: 10.1037/a0017346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Haynes, G. A. (2009). Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 26(3), 204–212. doi: 10.1002/mar.20269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herrmann, A., Heitmann, M., Morgan, R., Henneberg, S. C., & Landwehr, J. (2009). Consumer decision making and variety of offerings: The effect of attribute alignability. Psychology and Marketing, 26(4), 333–358. doi: 10.1002/mar.20276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Howell, R. T., & Hill, G. (2009). The mediators of experiential purchases: Determining the impact of psychological needs satisfaction and social comparison. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 511–522. doi: 10.1080/17439760903270993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Howell, R. T., Pchelin, P., & Iyer, R. (2012). The preference for experiences over possessions: Measurement and construct validation of the Experiential Buying Tendency Scale. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 57–71. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.626791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247–257. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hsee, C. K., & Leclerc, F. (1998). Will products look more attractive when presented separately or together? The Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Li, N., & Shen, L. (2008). Wealth, warmth and wellbeing: Whether happiness is relative or absolute depends on whether it is about money, acquisition or consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 396–409. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.396.
  64. Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 680–695. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Cai, C. F., & Zhang, S. (2013). Overearning. Psychological Science, 24(6), 852–859. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17(2), 143–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31(4), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kahn, B. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1991). Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67(3), 274–299.Google Scholar
  71. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kassam, K. S., Gilbert, D. T., Boston, A., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). Future anhedonia and time discounting. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1533–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kasser, T. (2011). Can thrift bring well-being? A review of the research and a tentative theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 865–877. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00396.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kihlstrom, J. F., Beer, J. S., & Klein, S. B. (2003). Self and identity as memory. In M. R. Leary & J. Tagney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 68–90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  79. Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(2), 97–129. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kumar, A., & Gilovich, T. (2013). We’ll always have Paris: Differential story utility from experiential and material purchases. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  82. Lee, B.-K., & Lee, W.-N. (2004). The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment. Psychology and Marketing, 21(3), 159–183. doi: 10.1002/mar.20000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–341. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ma, J., & Roese, N. J. (2013). The countability effect: Comparative versus experiential reactions to reward distributions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1219–1233. doi: 10.1086/668087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Martin, K. D., & Hill, R. P. (2012). Life satisfaction, self-determination, and consumption adequacy at the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1155–1168. doi: 10.1086/661528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mattila, A., & Wirtz, J. (2000). The role of preconsumption affect in postpurchase evaluation of services. Psychology and Marketing, 17(7), 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122. doi: 10.1037//I089-2680.5.2.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 210–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mitchell, T., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 421–448. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.55,1.56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Nelson, L. D., & Meyvis, T. (2008). Interrupted consumption: Disrupting adaptation to hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 654–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Newby-Clark, I. R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D. J., & Griffin, D. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 6(3), 171–182. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.6.3.171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Nickerson, C. C., Schwarz, N. N., Diener, E., & Kahneman, D. D. (2003). Zeroing in on the dark side of the American dream: A closer look at the negative consequences of the goal for financial success. Psychological Science, 14(6), 531–536. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1461.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Nicolao, L., Irwin, J. R., & Goodman, J. K. (2009). Happiness for sale: Do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188–198. doi: 10.1086/597049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Nowlis, S., Mandel, N., & McCabe, D. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. The Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 502–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Patrick, V. M., Macinnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2007). Not as happy as I thought I’d be? Affective misforecasting and product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 479–489. doi: 10.1086/510221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 144–159. doi: 10.1086/209532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Phillips, D. M., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). The role of consumption emotions in the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 243–252. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1203_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1008196717017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Quoidbach, J., Dunn, E. W., Petrides, K. V., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Money giveth, money taketh away: The dual effect of wealth on happiness. Psychological Science, 21(6), 759–763. doi: 10.1177/0956797610371963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate”. (B. Scheibehenne & P. M. Todd, Eds.). Psychology and Marketing, 26(3), 197–203. doi: 10.1002/mar.20268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rick, S. I., Cryder, C. E., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2008). Tightwads and spendthrifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 767–782. doi: 10.1086/523285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Rosenzweig, E., & Gilovich, T. (2012). Buyer’s remorse or missed opportunity? Differential regrets for material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 215–223. doi: 10.1037/a0024999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12(6), 1181–1187. doi: 10.1037/a0029873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology and Marketing, 26(3), 229–253. doi: 10.1002/mar.20271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta‐analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425. doi: 10.1086/651235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Schroeder, J., & Epley, N. (2013). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  120. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  121. Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1178–1197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sela, A., Berger, J., & Liu, W. (2009). Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 941–951. doi: 10.1086/593692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sevdalis, N., & Harvey, N. (2006). Determinants of willingness to pay in separate and joint evaluations of options: Context matters. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(3), 377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). The challenge of staying happier: Testing the hedonic adaptation prevention model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 670–680. doi: 10.1177/0146167212436400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Shiv, B., & Huber, J. (2000). The impact of anticipating satisfaction on consumer choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shugan, S. M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Solnick, S., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Soman, D. (2001). Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474. doi: 10.1086/319621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sparks, E. A., Ehrlinger, J., & Eibach, R. P. (2012). Failing to commit: Maximizers avoid commitment in a way that contributes to reduced satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Tsiros, M., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2004). The role of attributions in customer satisfaction: A reexamination. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 476–483. doi: 10.1086/422124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Ubel, P., Loewenstein, G. F., & Jepson, C. (2005). Disability and sunshine: Can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 11(2), 111–123. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Van Boven, L., & Ashworth, L. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 289–300. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Van Boven, L., Campbell, M. C., & Gilovich, T. (2010). Stigmatizing materialism: On stereotypes and Impressions of materialistic and experiential pursuits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 551–563. doi: 10.1177/0146167210362790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–1202. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Van Praag, B. M., & Frijters, P. (1999). The measurement of welfare and well-being: The Leyden approach. In Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 413–433).Google Scholar
  140. Wang, J., Novemsky, N., & Dhar, R. (2009). Anticipating adaptation to products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 149–159. doi: 10.1086/597050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2010). Pro-environmental behavior and rational consumer choice: Evidence from surveys of life satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 405–420. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D., Kermer, D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). The pleasures of uncertainty: Prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting, 35, 345–411.Google Scholar
  144. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 370–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Kraft, D., & Wetzel, C. G. (1989). Preferences as expectation-driven inferences: Effects of affective expectations on affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 519–530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wilson, A., & Ross, M. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1080/741938210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Scollon, C., & Diener, E. (2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14(5), 520–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Xiao, J. J., & Li, H. (2010). Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 323–329. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9746-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Zhang, S., & Markman, A. B. (2001). Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColby CollegeWatervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations