Intergroup Dialogue: Race Still Matters

  • Patricia Gurin
  • Nicholas Sorensen
  • Gretchen E. Lopez
  • Biren (Ratnesh) A. Nagda

Abstract

Contrary to popular depiction of young people in the United States as post-racial in their views about race, survey evidence confirms numerous differences in the views of White and non-White young people. These differences are seen both in studies of young people in the nation at large as well as among those attending colleges and universities. This chapter, which reports on a large experiment (N = 730 students) based on random assignment of student applicants to 26 race dialogue courses and to 26 wait-list control groups, also shows that students of color, compared to White students, held different explanations for racial/ethnic inequality when they applied to enroll in race/ethnicity dialogue courses. Participation in the race/ethnicity dialogue courses: (1) increased structural attributions for racial/ethnic inequality, although this effect was statistically reliable only for White students, and (2) narrowed but did not erase the initial differences between the two groups of students on the measures of structural attributions for racial/ethnic inequality. Thus, although race still matters at the end of the dialogue courses, the narrowing of perspectives on causes for racial inequality augurs well for possible coalitions of White youth and youth of color in attempting to reduce racial inequality.

References

  1. Adams, G., O’Brien, L. T., & Nelson, J. C. (2006). Perceptions of racism in Hurricane Katrina: A liberation psychology analysis. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6(1), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apollon, D. (2011, June 7). What’s racism? That’s harder for youth to answer than you think. http://www.Colorlines.com.
  3. Bai, M. (2010, July 17). Beneath divides seemingly about race are generational fault lines. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/us/politis/18bai.html.
  4. Bobo, L. D. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bobo, L. D. (2011). Somewhere between Jim Crow and post-racialism: Reflections on the racial divide in America today. Daedalus, 140(2), 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobo, L. D., & Fox, C. (2003). Race, racism, and discrimination: Bridging problems, methods and theory in social psychological research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(4), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bobo, L. D., & Johnson, D. (2000). Racial attitudes in a prismatic metropolis: Mapping identity, stereotypes, competition, and views on affirmative action. In L. D. Bobo, M. L. Oliver, J. H. Johnson Jr., & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Prismatic metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bobo, L. D., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler anti-Black ideology. In S. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Bobo, L. D., & Massagli, M. P. (2001). Stereotyping and urban inequality. In A. O’Connor, C. Tilly, & L. D. Bobo (Eds.), Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, C. J. (2011). Millennials and the myth of the post-racial society: Black youth, intra-generational divisions and the continuing racial divide in American politics. Daedalus, 140(2), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Dessel, A., Rogge, M. E., & Garlington, S. B. (2006). Using intergroup dialogue to promote social justice and change. Social Work, 51(4), 303–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellinor, L., & Gerard, G. (1998). Dialogue: Rediscover the transforming power of conversation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Feagin, J. R. (1975). Subordinating the poor: Welfare and American beliefs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Gorski, P. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grutter v. Bollinger, 288 F.3d 732 (2003).Google Scholar
  17. Gurin, G., Wade-Golden, K., & Matlock, J. (2011). Racial/ethnic perspectives of societal inequalities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  18. Gurin, P., Miller, A., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Zúñiga, X. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild, J. A., Weaver, V. M., & Burch, T. (2011). Destabilizing the American racial order. Daedalus, 140(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt, M. O. (2007). African American, Hispanic, and white beliefs about black/white inequality, 1977–2004. American Sociological Review, 72(3), 390–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, D. S., & Smith, R. M. (2011, September 2). On race, the silence is bipartisan. The New York Times, p. A21.Google Scholar
  23. Krysan, M., & Faison, N. (2008). Racial attitudes in America: An update. Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois. http://igpa.uillinois.edu/programs/racial-attitudes/detailed8.
  24. Logan, A., & Weller, C. E. (2009). The state of minorities: the recession issue. Center for American Progress. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/01/state_of_minorties.html.
  25. Lopez, G., Sorensen, N., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (2011). Education through intergroup dialogue: Implications for understanding inequality. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  26. Matlock, J., Wade-Golden, K., & Gurin, G. (2007). Michigan student study guidebook. Ann Arbor, MI: Office of Academic Multicultural Initiatives.Google Scholar
  27. Moya, P. M. L., & Markus, H. R. (2010). Doing race: An introduction. In H. R. Markus & P. M. L. Moya (Eds.), Doing race: 21 essays for the 2lst century. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Nagda, B. A. (2006). Breaking barriers, crossing boundaries, building bridges: Communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagda, B. A., & Gurin, P. (2007). Intergroup dialogue: A critical-dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality and social justice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 111, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., & Zúñiga, X. (2009). Evaluating intergroup dialogue: Engaging diversity for social and personal responsibility. Diversity & Democracy, 12(1), 4–6.Google Scholar
  31. National Urban League. (2009). The state of black America. New York: National Urban League.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2003). Effect size substantive interpretation guidelines: Issues in the interpretation of effect sizes. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  34. Walsh, K. C. (2007). Talking about race: Community dialogues and the politics of difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zúñiga, X., Nagda, B. A., Chesler, M., & Cytron-Walker, A. (2007). Intergroup dialogues in higher education: Meaningful learning about social justice. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(4), 1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Gurin
    • 1
  • Nicholas Sorensen
    • 2
  • Gretchen E. Lopez
    • 3
  • Biren (Ratnesh) A. Nagda
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.American Institutes for ResearchWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  4. 4.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations