Race and Social Problems pp 39-60
Intergroup Dialogue: Race Still Matters
Contrary to popular depiction of young people in the United States as post-racial in their views about race, survey evidence confirms numerous differences in the views of White and non-White young people. These differences are seen both in studies of young people in the nation at large as well as among those attending colleges and universities. This chapter, which reports on a large experiment (N = 730 students) based on random assignment of student applicants to 26 race dialogue courses and to 26 wait-list control groups, also shows that students of color, compared to White students, held different explanations for racial/ethnic inequality when they applied to enroll in race/ethnicity dialogue courses. Participation in the race/ethnicity dialogue courses: (1) increased structural attributions for racial/ethnic inequality, although this effect was statistically reliable only for White students, and (2) narrowed but did not erase the initial differences between the two groups of students on the measures of structural attributions for racial/ethnic inequality. Thus, although race still matters at the end of the dialogue courses, the narrowing of perspectives on causes for racial inequality augurs well for possible coalitions of White youth and youth of color in attempting to reduce racial inequality.
- Apollon, D. (2011, June 7). What’s racism? That’s harder for youth to answer than you think. http://www.Colorlines.com.
- Bai, M. (2010, July 17). Beneath divides seemingly about race are generational fault lines. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/us/politis/18bai.html.
- Bobo, L. D. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In N. J. Smelser, W. J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Bobo, L. D., & Johnson, D. (2000). Racial attitudes in a prismatic metropolis: Mapping identity, stereotypes, competition, and views on affirmative action. In L. D. Bobo, M. L. Oliver, J. H. Johnson Jr., & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Prismatic metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Bobo, L. D., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler anti-Black ideology. In S. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Bobo, L. D., & Massagli, M. P. (2001). Stereotyping and urban inequality. In A. O’Connor, C. Tilly, & L. D. Bobo (Eds.), Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ellinor, L., & Gerard, G. (1998). Dialogue: Rediscover the transforming power of conversation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Feagin, J. R. (1975). Subordinating the poor: Welfare and American beliefs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Grutter v. Bollinger, 288 F.3d 732 (2003).Google Scholar
- Gurin, G., Wade-Golden, K., & Matlock, J. (2011). Racial/ethnic perspectives of societal inequalities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
- Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Zúñiga, X. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- King, D. S., & Smith, R. M. (2011, September 2). On race, the silence is bipartisan. The New York Times, p. A21.Google Scholar
- Krysan, M., & Faison, N. (2008). Racial attitudes in America: An update. Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois. http://igpa.uillinois.edu/programs/racial-attitudes/detailed8.
- Logan, A., & Weller, C. E. (2009). The state of minorities: the recession issue. Center for American Progress. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/01/state_of_minorties.html.
- Lopez, G., Sorensen, N., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (2011). Education through intergroup dialogue: Implications for understanding inequality. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University, Syracuse.Google Scholar
- Matlock, J., Wade-Golden, K., & Gurin, G. (2007). Michigan student study guidebook. Ann Arbor, MI: Office of Academic Multicultural Initiatives.Google Scholar
- Moya, P. M. L., & Markus, H. R. (2010). Doing race: An introduction. In H. R. Markus & P. M. L. Moya (Eds.), Doing race: 21 essays for the 2lst century. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., & Zúñiga, X. (2009). Evaluating intergroup dialogue: Engaging diversity for social and personal responsibility. Diversity & Democracy, 12(1), 4–6.Google Scholar
- National Urban League. (2009). The state of black America. New York: National Urban League.Google Scholar
- Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2003). Effect size substantive interpretation guidelines: Issues in the interpretation of effect sizes. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.Google Scholar