A New Exact Penalty Function Approach to Semi-infinite Programming Problem

Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new exact penalty function method for solving a class of semi-infinite programming problems (SIPs). We introduce a logarithmic form function of the constraint violation, where the constraint violation is a measure of the violation of the constraints of the current iterate. By appending it to the objective function, we obtain a sequence of approximate conventional unconstrained optimization problem. It is proved that when the penalty parameter is sufficiently large, any local minimizer of the approximate problem is a local minimizer of the original problem. Numerical results show that the proposed method is effective.

Keywords

Feasible Region Penalty Parameter Constraint Violation Exact Penalty Exact Penalty Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Brosowski, B.: Parametric Semi-infinite Optimization. Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dall’Aglio, M.: On some applications of lsip to probability and statistics. In: Goberna, M.A., L\(\acute{o}\) pez, M.A. (eds.) Semi-infinite Programming, Recent Advances, Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, 57, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glashoff, K., Gustafson, S.A.: Linear Optimization and Approximation, Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, (1983)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gonzaga, C., Polak, E., Trahan, R.: An improved algorithm for optimization problems with functional inequality constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 25(1), 49–54 (1980)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hettich, R. (ed.): Semi-infinite Programming. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin (1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hettich, R., Kortanek, K.O.: Semi-infinite programming: Theory, methods, and applications. SIAM Rev. 35(3), 380–429 (1993)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huyer, W., Neumaier, A.: A new exact penalty function. SIAM J. Optim. 13(4), 1141–1158 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jennings, L.S., Teo, K.L.: A computational algorithm for functional inequality constrained optimization problems. Automatica 26, 371–375 (1990)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kortanek, K.O., Fiacco, A.V. (eds.): Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 215, Springer-Verlag (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L\(\acute{o}\) pez, M.A., Goberna, M.A.: Linear Semi-infinite Optimization. Wiley, Chichester (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L\(\acute{o}\) pez, M., Still, G.: Semi-infinite programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180, 491–518 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Y., Teo, K.L., Wu, S.Y.: A new quadratic semi-infinite programming algorithm based on dual parametrization. J. Glob. Optim. 29, 401–413 (2004)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polak, E., Mayne, D.Q.: An algorithm for optimization problems with functional inequality constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 21, 184–193 (1976)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polak, E., Pister, K.S., Ray, D.: Optimal design framed structures subjected to earthquak. Eng. Optim. 12, 65–71 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polak, E., Mayne, D.Q., Stimler, D.M.: Control system design via semi-infinite optimization: A review. Proc. IEEE 72(12), 1777–1794 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teo, K.L., Rehbock, V., Jennings, L.S.: A new computational algorithm for functional inequality constrained optimization problems. Automatica 29, 789–792 (1993)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teo, K.L., Yang, X.Q., Jennings, L.S.: Computational discretization algorithms for functional inequality constrained optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 98, 215–234 (2000)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu, S.Y., Fang, S.C., Lin, C.J.: Relaxed cutting plane method for solving linear semi-infinite programming problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 99(3), 759–779 (1998)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu, S.Y., Li, D.H., Qi, L.Q., Zhou, G.L.: An iterative method for solving KKT system of the semi-infinite programming. Optim. Methods Softw. 20(6), 629–643 (2005)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang, X.Q., Teo, K.L.: Nonlinear Lagrangian functions and applications to semi-infinite programs. Ann. Oper. Res. 103, 235–250 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu, C.J., Teo, K.L., Zhang, L.S., Bai, Y.Q.: A new exact penalty function method for continuous inequality constrained optimization problems. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 8(2), 485–491 (2010)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu, C.J., Teo, K.L., Zhang, L.S., Bai, Y.Q.: On a refinement of the convergence analysis for the new exact penalty function method for continuous inequality constrained optimization problem. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 6(4), 895–910 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business School, Central South UniversityBentleyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsCurtin UniversityChangshaChina
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  4. 4.Shanghai UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations