Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol

  • Michał Wódczak
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

Following the introduction of the notion of Autonomic Cooperative Behaviour (ACB) in the previous chapter, the bottom-up description of the proposed Autonomic Cooperative System Architectural Model (ACSAM) is continued with the outlining of the workings of the Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol (ACNP). In fact, the ACNP protocol is a cross-layer solution which is may be perceived as a bit biased towards the Network Layer of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Reference Model (RM), however, on the other hand, it is profoundly rooted in the Distributed Spatio-Temporal Block Coding (DSTBC) of the Link Layer, in fact, going down even to the Physical Layer when the orchestration of the underlying Virtual Multiple Input Multiple Output (VMIMO) is concerned. In particular, once the motivation for the said cross-layering has been explained, the relevant context of the Optimised Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol is introduced to form the basis for its extension, the Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol. Following, the integration of the tightly related ACB is described with a special emphasis on its composition with the aid of the Multi-Point Relay (MPR) station selection heuristics. This part is complemented with the proposed messaging structure along with the detailing of the functioning of ACNP itself in terms of assigning Autonomic Cooperative Nodes (ACNs) to Virtual Cooperative Sets (VCSs). Eventually, the analysis of the expected overhead induced by the OLSR-ACNP tandem is carried out to establish the region of safe and efficient operation.

Keywords

Link Layer Control Overhead Optimise Link State Routing Neighbour Type Open System Interconnection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Abolhasan, M., Wysocki, T., & Lipman, J. (2005). Performance investigation on three classes of MANET routing protocols. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (pp. 774–778).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adjih, C., Baccelli, E., & Jacquet, P. (2003). Link state routing in wireless ad-hoc networks. IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM (pp. 13–16).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alamouti, S. (1998). A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(8), 1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clausen, T., Dearlove, C., Jacquet, P., & Herberg, U. (2013). The optimized link state routing protocol version 2. IETF mobile Ad hoc networking (MANET) internet-draft. draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-19.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clausen, T., & Jacquet, P. (2003). Optimised link state routing protocol (OLSR). RFC 3626.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dohler, M., & Li, Y. (2010). Cooperative communications - hardware, channel & PHY. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doppler, K., Redana, S., Wódczak, M., Rost, P., & Wichman, R. (2007). Dynamic resource assignment and cooperative relaying in cellular networks: Concept and performance assessment. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C, & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laneman, J. N., & Wornell, G. W. (2003). Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 49(10), 2415–2425.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pabst, R., Walke, B., Schultz, D. C., Herhold, P., Yanikomeroglu, H., Mukherjee, S., et al. (2004). Relay-based deployment concepts for wireless and mobile broadband radio. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(9), 80–89.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wódczak, M. (2007). Extended REACT - routing information enhanced algorithm for cooperative transmission. In: 16th IST Mobile & Wireless Communications Summit 2007, Budapest, Hungary, 1–5 July 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wódczak, M. (2011). Aspects of cross-layer design in autonomic cooperative networking. In: IEEE 3rd International Workshop on Cross Layer Design, Rennes, France, 30 Nov–1 Dec 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wódczak, M. (2011). Autonomic cooperation in Ad-hoc environments. In: 5th International Workshop on Localised Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks (LOCALGOS) in Conjunction with IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), Barcelona, Spain, 27–29 June 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wódczak, M. (2011). Autonomic cooperative networking for wireless green sensor systems. International Journal of Sensor Networks (IJSNet), 10(1/2), 83–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wódczak, M. (2012). Autonomic cooperative networking. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wódczak, M., Meriem, T. B., Radier, B., Chaparadza, R., Quinn, K., Kielthy, J., et al. (2011). Standardizing a reference model and autonomic network architectures for the self-managing future internet. IEEE Network, 25(6), 50–56.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wódczak, M., Tcholtchev, N., Vidalenc, B., & Li, Y. (2013). Design and evaluation of techniques for resilience and survivability of the routing node. International Journal of Adaptive, Resilient and Autonomic Systems (IJARAS), 4(4), 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zimmermann, E., Herhold, P., & Fettweis, G. (2005). On the performance of cooperative relaying in wireless networks. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 16(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michał Wódczak
    • 1
  1. 1.PoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations