Mycorrhizal Fungi to Alleviate Salinity Stress on Plant Growth

  • Mohammad MiransariEmail author


The process of symbiosis between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and the host plant results in the production of an extensive hyphal network and hence the increased uptake of water and nutrients by the host plant. The fungi are able to increase plant growth and crop production under different conditions including stress. Salinity stress is among the most important stresses adversely affecting plant growth. There are different mechanisms used by the fungi to alleviate the stress including the increased uptake of water and nutrients by the host plant and the uptake of salt by the fungal vacuoles. In this chapter, some of the most recent finding related to the alleviating effects of mycorrhizal fungi affecting plant growth under salinity are presented and analyzed.


Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Salinity stress Plant growth 


  1. Aliasgharzadeh N, Saleh Rastin N, Towfighi H, Alizadeh A (2001) Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils of the Tabriz Plain of Iran in relation to some physical and chemical properties of soil. Mycorrhiza 11:119–122Google Scholar
  2. Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2007) How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under drought, cold or salinity stresses? New Phytol 173:808–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2012) Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions. J Exp Bot 63:43–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aroca R, Vernieri P, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2008) Mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants exhibit contrasting responses to exogenous ABA during drought stress and recovery. J Exp Bot 59:2029–2041PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aroca R, Ferrante A, Vernieri P, Chrispeels MJ (2006) Drought, abscisic acid and transpiration rate effects on the regulation of PIP aquaporin gene expression and abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris plants. Ann Bot 98:1301–1310PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and VA mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen M, Wei H, Cao J, Liu R, Wang Y, Zheng C (2007) Expression of Bacillus subtilis proAB genes and reduction of feedback inhibition of proline synthesis increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. J Biochem Mol Biol 40:396–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daei G, Ardakani M, Rejali F, Teimuri S, Miransari M (2009) Alleviation of salinity stress on wheat yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions. J Plant Physiol 166:617–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. del Amor F, Cuadra-Crespo P (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Funct Plant Biol 39:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Estrada B, Aroca R, Maathuis F, Barea J, Ruiz-Lozano J (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi native from a Mediterranean saline area enhance maize tolerance to salinity through improved ion homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ 36:1771–1782Google Scholar
  11. Feng G, Zhang FS, Li XL, Tian CY, Tang C, Rengel Z (2002) Improved tolerance of maize plants to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza is related to higher accumulation of soluble sugars in roots. Mycorrhiza 12:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo′ M, Hanson DT, Bota J, Otto B, Cifre J, McDowell M, Medrano H, Kaldenhoff R (2006) Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo. Plant J 48:427–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grover M, Ali S, Sandhya V, Rasul A, Venkateswarlu B (2011) Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stresses. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1231–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammer E, Nasr H, Pallon J, Olsson P, Wallander H (2011) Elemental composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at high salinity. Mycorrhiza 21:117–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer EC, Rillig MC (2011) The influence of different stresses on glomalin levels in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus—salinity increases glomalin content. PLoS ONE 6:e28426PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jahromi F, Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2008) Influence of salinity on the in vitro development of Glomus intraradices and on the in vivo physiological and molecular responses of mycorrhizal lettuce plants. Microb Ecol 55:45–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Javot H, Maurel C (2002) The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Ann Bot 90:301–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kepinski S (2006) Integrating hormone signalling and patterning mechanisms in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:28–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohler J, Hernandez JA, Caravaca F, Roldan A (2008) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify alleviation biochemical mechanisms in water stressed plants. Funct Plant Biol 35:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar A, Sharma S, Mishra S (2010) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and salinity on seedling growth, solute accumulation, and mycorrhizal dependency of Jatropha curcas L. J Plant Growth Reg 29:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lelmen K, Yu X, Kikuchi A, Shimazaki T, Mimura M, Watanabe K (2010) Mycorrhizal colonization of transgenic Eucalyptus camaldulensis carrying the mangrin gene for salt tolerance. Plant Biotechnol 27:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maathuis FJM (2006) The role of monovalent cation transporters in plant responses to salinity. J Exp Bot 57:1137–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manchanda G, Garg N (2008) Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiol Plant 30:595–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mardukhi B, Rejali F, Daei G, Ardakani MR, Malakouti MJ, Miransari M (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizas enhance nutrient uptake in different wheat genotypes at high salinity levels under field and greenhouse conditions. CR Biol 334:564–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marten I, Hoth S, Deeken R, Ache P, Ketchum KA, Hoshi T, Hedrich R (1999) AKT3, a phloem-localized K+ channel, is blocked by protons. Proc Nat Acad Sci U.S.A 96:7581–7586Google Scholar
  27. Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V (2008) Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59:595–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ 33:453–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakouti MJ (2008) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miransari M (2010) Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to plant growth under different types of soil stresses. Review article. Plant Biol 12:563–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miransari M (2011) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Review article. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:917–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miransari M (2012a). Microbial products and soil stresses. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in Agrobiology: stress management. Springer, pp 333, ISBN: 978-3-642-23464-4Google Scholar
  33. Miransari M (2012b) Role of phytohormone signaling during stress. In: Ahmad P, Prasad MNV (eds.) Environmental adaptations and stress tolerance of plants in the era of climate change, 1st edn. Springer, p 715, hardcover, 89 illus., 39 in color. ISBN: 978-1-4614-0814-7Google Scholar
  34. Miransari M (2013) Soil microbes and the availability of soil nutrients. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35:3075–3084Google Scholar
  35. Miransari M (2014) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Plant Nutr (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Miransari et al. (2013) Improving soybean (Glycine max L.) N2-fixation under stress. J Plant Growth Regul 32:909–921Google Scholar
  37. Miransari M et al. (2014) Plant hormones as signals in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Crit Rev Biotechnol (in press)Google Scholar
  38. Mittova V, Tal M, Volokita M, Guy M (2003) Up-regulation of the leaf mitochondrial and peroxisomal antioxidative systems in responses to salt-induced oxidative stress in the wild salt-tolerant tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Cell Environ 26:845–856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ouziad F, Wilde P, Schmelzer E, Hildebrandt U, Bothe H (2006) Analysis of expression of aquaporins and Na+/H+ transporters in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and affected by salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 57:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot 55:1743–1750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porcel R, Aroca R, Azcón R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2006) PIP aquaporin gene expression in arbuscular mycorrhizal Glycine max and Lactuca sativa plants in relation to drought stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 60:389–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rabie GH, Almadini AM (2005) Role of bioinoculants in development of salt-tolerance of Vicia faba plants under salinity stress. Afric J of Biotechnol 4:210–222Google Scholar
  44. Ruiz-Lozano J, Porcel R, Azcon C, Aroca R (2012) Regulation by arbuscular mycorhizae of the integrated physiological response to salinity in plants: new challenges in physiological and molecular studies. J Exp Bot 63:4033–4044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2010) Modulation of aquaporin genes by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in relation to osmotic stress tolerance. In: Sechback J, Grube M (eds) Symbiosis and stress. Springer, Berlin, pp 359–374Google Scholar
  46. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcon R, Gomez M (1995) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomus species on drought tolerance: physiological and nutritional plant responses. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:456–460PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruiz-Sanchez M, Aroca R, Munoz Y, Polon R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2010) The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress. J Plant Physiol 167:862–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sajedi NA, Ardakani MR, Rejali F, Mohabbati F, Miransari M (2010) Yield and yield components of hybrid corn (Zea mays L.) as affected by mycorrhizal symbiosis and zinc sulfate under drought stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 16:343–351PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sajedi NA, Ardakani MR, Madani H, Naderi A, Miransari M (2011) The effects of selenium and other micronutrients on the antioxidant activities and yield of corn (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 7:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schubert S, Neubert A, Schierholt A, Sümer A, Zörb C (2009) Development of salt-resistant maize hybrids: the combination of physiological strategies using conventional breeding methods. Plant Sci 177:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, Yang BW, Zhang FF, Huang YH (2008) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 18:287–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheng M, Tang M, Zhang FF, Huang YH (2011) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on organic solutes in maize leaves under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 21:423–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shi HZ, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK (2002) The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell 14:465–477PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu QS, Xia RX (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. J Plant Physiol 163:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu QS, Zou YN, He XH (2010) Contributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to growth, photosynthesis, root morphology and ionic balance of citrus seedlings under salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant 32:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang CW, Xu HH, Wang LL, Liu J, Shi DC, Wang GD (2009) Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica 47:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhong H, Chao XH, Zhibin Z, Zhirong Z, Huai Song W (2007) Changes in antioxidative enzymes and cell membrane osmosis in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizae under NaCl stress. Colloids Surf, B 59:128–133Google Scholar
  58. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu JK (2003) Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:441–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Book and ArticleAbtinBerkeh Limited CoIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations