Advertisement

The Golden Arches: An Approach to Teaching Statistics in a First-Year University Service Course

  • Małgorzata Wiktoria KorolkiewiczEmail author
  • Belinda Ann Chiera
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 81)

Abstract

The realities of large first year service courses add substantially to the challenges of creating an environment conducive to learning. Given the increased understanding of the importance of context in Statistics education, discipline relevance is a key consideration in designing effective and engaging curriculum. However, students enter university with increasingly diverse levels of competency in quantitative subjects, and a survey conducted in the first week of teaching typically reveals negative perceptions of Mathematics, and by extension of Statistics, tempered with anxiety about quantitative subjects in general. We present strategies to overcome some of these challenges in relation to a quantitative methods course for first year Business students. Analysis of a follow-up survey at the end of the course reveals a positive shift in students’ attitudes and improvement in student success in the course.

Keywords

Maths anxiety Large first year classes Service teaching 

References

  1. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Gordon, S. (2004). Understanding students’ experiences of statistics in a service course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(1), 40–59.Google Scholar
  4. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e48076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moore, D. (2005). Quality and relevance in the first statistics course. International Statistical Review, 73(2), 205–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nankervis, K. (2008). Service teaching: Student experiences, issues and future directions at RMIT, Ed. The RMIT Learning and Teaching Journal, 3(1).Google Scholar
  9. Nicholls, D. F. (2001). Future directions for the teaching and learning of statistics at the tertiary level. International Statistical Review, 69(1), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Preis, C., & Biggs, B. T. (2001). Can instructors help learners overcome math anxiety? ATEA Journal, 28(4), 6–10.Google Scholar
  12. Scutter, S., Luzeckyj, A., Burke da Silva, K., Palmer, E., & Brinkworth, R. (2011). What do commencing undergraduate students expect from first year university? The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 2(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thompson, R., LeBard, R., & Quinnell, R. (2012). In IISME forum on preparedness for first year mathematics: Issues and strategies for dealing with diverse cohorts. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Małgorzata Wiktoria Korolkiewicz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Belinda Ann Chiera
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations