A Framework for Personalised Learning-Plan Recommendations in Game-Based Learning

  • Ioana Hulpuş
  • Conor Hayes
  • Manuel Oliveira Fradinho


Personalised recommender systems receive growing attention from researchers of technology enhanced learning. The learning domain has a great need for personalisation as there is a general consensus that instructional material should be adapted to the knowledge, needs and abilities of learners. At the same time, the increase in the interest in game-based learning opens great opportunities for learning material personalisation, due to the complexity of life situations that can be simulated in serious games environments. In this paper, we present a model for competency development using serious games, which is supported by case-based learning-plan recommendation. While case-based reasoning has been used before for recommending learning objects, this work goes beyond current state-of-the-art, by recommending learning plans in a two-step hierarchical case-based planning strategy. First of all, several abstract plans are retrieved, personalised and recommended to the learner. In the second stage, the chosen plan is incrementally instantiated as the learner engages with the learning material. We also suggest how several learning strategies that resonate with a game-based learning environment, can drive the adaptation of learning material.


  1. 1.
    Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations and system approaches. AI Comm 7(1):39–59Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barab S, Thomas M, Dodge T, Carteaux R, Tuzun H (2005) Making learning fun: Quest atlantis, a game without guns. ETR D 53(1):86–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedek M, Seitlinger P, Kopeinik S, Albert D (2012) Inferring a learner’s cognitive, motivational and emotional state in a digital educational game. Electron J e-Learn 10(2):172–184Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergmann R, Wilke W (1995) Building and refining abstract planning cases by change of representation language. J Artif Intell Res 3:53–118Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergmann R, Wilke W (1996) On the role of abstraction in case-based reasoning. Advances in case-based reasoning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, p 28–43Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonzano A, Cunningham P, Smyth B, et al (1997) Using introspective learning to improve retrieval in CBR: A case study in air traffic control. Lect Note Comput Sci 1266:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyle E, Connolly TM, Hainey T (2011) The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer games. Entertain Comput 2(2):69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Branting K, Aha DW (1995) Stratified case-based reasoning: Reusing hierarchical problem solving episodes. In: IJCAI, p 384–390Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charles D, McAlister M (2004) Integrating ideas about invisible playgrounds from play theory into online educational digital games. Entertain Comput ICEC 2004, pp 598–601Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Connolly TM, Boyle EA, MacArthur E, Hainey T, Boyle JM (2012) A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput Educ 59(2):661–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox MT, Munoz-Avila H, Bergmann R (2006) Case-based planning. Knowl Eng Rev 20(3):283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Freitas S (2008) Emerging technologies for learning. Technical report, BectaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drachsler H, Hummel H, Koper R (2007) Recommendations for learners are different: Applying memory-based recommender system techniques to lifelong learning. In: Workshop on social information retrieval for technology-enhanced learning and exchangeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drachsler H, Hummel H, Koper R (2009) Identifying the goal, user model and conditions of recommender systems for formal and informal learning. J Dig Inform, 10(2):4–24Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Druckman D, Bjork R (1991) National research council. In the mind’s eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington DC: The National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gómez-Albarrán M, Jiménez-Dıaz G (2009) Recommendation and students authoring in repositories of learning objects: A case-based reasoning approach. iJET 4(S1):35–40Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gómez-Martín M, Gómez-Martín P, González-Calero P (2004) Game-driven intelligent tutoring systems. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3166. Springer, New York, p 108–113Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gómez-Martın P, Gómez-Martın M, Dıaz-Agudo B, González-Calero P (2004) Opportunities for cbr in learning by doing. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on case-based reasoning (ICCBR). Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammond JS (1976) Learning by the case method. Harvard Business School Publishing Division, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hammond K (1990) Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognit Sci 14:385–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harzallah M, Berio G, Vernadat F (2006) Analysis and modeling of individual competencies: Toward better management of human resources. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 36(1):187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hendrix M, Protopsaltis A, Dunwell I, de Freitas S, Arnab S, Petridis P, Rolland C, Llanas J (2012) Defining a metadata schema for serious games as learning objects. In: The fourth international conference on mobile, hybrid and on-line learningGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    IBM and Seriosity (2007) Virtual worlds, real leaders: Online games put the future of business leadership on display. Technical report, IBM and SeriosityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jonassen DH, Hernandez-Serrano J (2002) Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educ Tech Res Dev 50(2):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karampiperis P, Sampson D (2005) Adaptive learning resources sequencing in educational hypermedia systems. Educ Tech Soc 8:128–147Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kebritchi M, Hirumi A, et al (2008) Examining the pedagogical foundations of modern educational computer games. Comput Educ 51(4):1729–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kolb DA, Boyatzis RE, Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, 227–247Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kolodner JL, Hmelo CE, Narayanan NH (1996) Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In: Second international conference of the learning sciencesGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leake D, Kinley A, Wilson D (1995) Learning to improve case adaptation by introspective reasoning and CBR. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 229–229Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee C, Cheg KYR, Liu A (2008) A case-based planning approach for agent-based service-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (SMC 2008), pp 625–630Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Manouselis N, Drachsler H, Vuorikari R, Hummel H, Koper R (2011) Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB (eds) Recommender systems handbook. Springer, New York, pp 387–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marton F, Pang MF (2006) On some necessary conditions of learning. J Learn Sci 15(2):193–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marton F, Trigwell K (2000) Variatio est mater studiorum. High Educ Res Dev 19(3):381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meyer JHF, Shanahan MP (2004) Developing metalearning capacity in students: actionable theory and practical lessons learned in first-year economics. Innovat Educ Teach Int 41(4):443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Munoz-Avila H, Cox MT (2008) Case-based plan adaptation: An analysis and review. IEEE Intell Syst 23(4):75–81Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pal S, Shiu S (2004) Foundations of soft case-based reasoning, vol 8. Wiley-interscience, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reye J (2004) Student modelling based on belief networks. Int J Artif Intell Educ 14:1–33Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Richter MM, Aamodt A (2005) Case-based reasoning foundations. Knowl Eng Rev 20(3):203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ruskov M, Seager W (2011) What can bits teach us about leadership: A study of the application of variation theory in serious games. In: Ma M, Fradinho Oliveira M, Madeiras Pereira J (eds) Serious games development and applications, vol 6944 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, New York, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Santos OC, Boticario J (2010) Modeling recommendations for the educational domain. Procedia CS 1(2):2793–2800Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Savery JR, Duffy TM (1994) Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist frameworkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schank RC (1996) Goal based scenario: Case-based reasoning meets learning by doing. Case-based reasoning: experiences, lessons and future directions, pp 295–347Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shute VJ, Ventura M, Bauer M, Zapata-Rivera D (2009) Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning: Flow and grow. In: Ritterfield U, Cody MJ, Vorderer P (eds) Serious games: Mechanisms and effects. Routledge, NY, pp 295–321Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Smyth B (1998) Case-base maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systemsGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smyth B (2007) Case-based recommendation. In: Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web. Springer, New York, pp 342–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smyth B, Keane MT (1998) Adaptation-guided retrieval: questioning the similarity assumption in reasoning. Artif Intell 102:249–293CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smyth B, Keane MT, Cunningham P (2001) Hierarchical case-based reasoning integrating case-based and decompositional problem-solving techniques for plant-control software design. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 13(5):793–812Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smyth B, McClave P (2001) Similarity vs. diversity. Lect Note Comput Sci 2080:347–361Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Soh L-K, Blank T (2008) Integrating case-based reasoning and meta-learning for a self-improving intelligent tutoring system. Int J Artif Intell Educ 18:27–58Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Spalazzi L (2001) A survey on case-based planning. Artif Intell Rev 16:3–36CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Spiro RJ, Feltovich RP, Jacobson MJ, Coulson RL (1992) Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, pp 57–76Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tobias L, Dietrich A (2003) Identifying employee competencies in dynamic work domains: Methodological considerations and a case study. J Univers Comput Sci 9(12):1500–1518Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioana Hulpuş
    • 1
  • Conor Hayes
    • 2
  • Manuel Oliveira Fradinho
    • 3
  1. 1.INSIGHT Centre for Data Analytics, NUIGalwayIreland
  2. 2.College of Engineering and Informatics, NUIGalwayIreland
  3. 3.SINTEFTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations