DEA for Two-Stage Networks: Efficiency Decompositions and Modeling Techniques

Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 208)

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for identifying best practices among peer decision making units (DMUs). An important area of development in recent years has been that devoted to applications wherein DMUs represent network processes. One particular subset of such processes is those in which all the outputs from the first stage become inputs to the second stage. We call these types of DMU structures “two-stage networks”. Existing approaches in modeling efficiency of two-stage networks can be categorized as using either Stackelberg (leader-follower), or cooperative game concepts. There are two types of efficiency decomposition; multiplicative and additive. In multiplicative efficiency decomposition, the overall efficiency is defined as a product of the two individual stages’ efficiency scores, whereas in additive efficiency decomposition, the overall efficiency is defined as a weighted average of the two individual stages’ efficiency scores. We discuss modeling techniques used for solving two-stage network DEA models in linear programs.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Efficiency Decomposition Game Intermediate measure Network Cooperative Two-stage 

References

  1. Avkiran, N. K. (2009). Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks. Omega, 37, 930–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 181–186.Google Scholar
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C.-M. (2009). A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology & Management Journal, 5(1–2), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, Y., Liang, L., Yang, F., & Zhu, J. (2006). Evaluation of information technology investment: A data envelopment analysis approach. Computers & Operations Research, 33(5), 1368–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2009a). Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 600–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009b). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1170–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2010a). Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., Du, J., Sherman, H. D., & Zhu, J. (2010b). DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, C.-L., Zhu, J., Yu, J.-Y., & Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(2), 348–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chilingerian, J., & Sherman, H. D. (2004). Health care applications: From Hospitals to Physician, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, W. D., & Hababou, M. (2001). Sales performance measurement in bank branches. Omega, 29, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2007). Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 692–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, W. D., Green, R., & Zhu, J. (2006). Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis. IIE Transactions, 38(2), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Yang, F., & Bi, G.-B. (2010). Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1122–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Du, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(2), 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Färe, R., & Whittaker, G. (1995). An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46(2), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega 38(5), 398–409.Google Scholar
  23. Huang, Z. M., & Li, S. X. (2001). Co-op advertising models in a manufacturing-retailing supply chain: A game theory approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega, 40(5), 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang, L., Li, Z.-Q., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). DEA Efficiency in two-stage networks with feed back. IIE Transactions, 43, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2013). Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs local optimum. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 276–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Premachandra, I. M., Zhu, J., Watson, J., & Galagedera, D. U. A. (2012). Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3302–3317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sexton, T. R., & Lewis, H. F. (2003). Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2–3), 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3–4), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, C. H., Gopal, R., & Zionts, S. (1997). Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu, M.-M., & Lin, E. T. J. (2008). Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model. Omega, 36, 1005–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of BusinessWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations