Advertisement

Accelerated Lattice Boltzmann Method

  • Hassan Farhat
  • Joon Sang Lee
  • Sasidhar Kondaraju
Chapter

Abstract

The LBM is a powerful numerical fluid solver especially in the areas of multicomponent and multiphase mixtures. However the LBM uses the particle velocity for the determination of the model time step required by the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability condition. This degrades the LBM efficiency, when compared with standard CFD solvers which use instead the macroscopic velocity for the CFL requirements. To increases the efficiency of the LBM and especially for multiphase flow simulations, the migrating multiblock (MMB) was introduced.

This chapter presents an extension scheme for the application of the single phase multiblock lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) to the multiphase Gunstensen and Shan and Chen models. The grid is refined for part of the domain where a fluid–fluid interface evolves, and the refined grid is free to migrate with the suspended phase in the flow direction. The method is applicable to single and multiphase flows in 2D and 3D domains. This accelerated scheme was demonstrated by simulating a benchmark single phase flow around a 2D asymmetrically placed cylinder in a channel and for investigating the shear lift of 2D neutrally buoyant bubble in a parabolic flow. The method was also used for simulating cases of 3D rising bubbles in infinite medium, in which the model results for the bubble terminal velocity were in good agreement with a semianalytical solution, and the produced shapes fitted very well in an experimental shape regime map. The MMB was also used for the study of the sedimentation of droplet onto horizontal surfaces with different wetting characteristics of wall surface, which led to the identification of three different regimes of droplet shapes. It was shown that the process of different regimes can be controlled by changing the wetting characteristics of surface.

Keywords

Lattice Boltzmann Method Bond Number Fine Block Droplet Shape Fine Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

C3.1.1.2

MMPois. Phase field density contours show the migrating fine grid while tracking a moving droplet inside a channel (WMV 504 kb)

C3.1.2.1

Vortex shedding. Vertical velocity contours for a multi-block simulation are shown here. (see Fig. 3.7) (WMV 246 kb)

C3.1.2.2

MIGrho. Phase field density contours show a fine grid migrating along with the droplet in a 2D channel. The droplet is observed to move away from the wall towards the center of the channel due to the lift force acting upon it. (see Fig. 3.9) (WMV 303 kb)

C3.2.3.1

MBouy1. 3D simulation of rising bubble of a rising bubble in infinite medium is shown for two different Eotvos numbers Eo = 374 [MBouy1] and Eo = 449 [MBouy2]. The movies show the migrating fine grid tracking the center of mass of the rising bubble and moving along with the bubble. (see Fig. 3.16 and Table 3.1) (WMV 255 kb)

C3.2.3.1

MBouy2. 3D simulation of rising bubble of a rising bubble in infinite medium is shown for two different Eotvos numbers Eo = 374 [MBouy1] and Eo = 449 [MBouy2]. The movies show the migrating fine grid tracking the center of mass of the rising bubble and moving along with the bubble (see Fig. 3.16 and Table 3.1) (WMV 174 kb)

C3.2.3.4

Trailing. 3D phase field contours of two trailing bubbles are shown in the movie. Movie shows the fine grid moving along the trailing bubbles (see Fig. 3.22) (WMV 247 kb)

C3.3.2.1

3DSCMMBsed0. 3D phase field contour of droplet sedimenting under the influence of gravity is shown for pseudo-potential multi-component LBM model. The droplet and the fine grid migrate together to the bottom of the domain (WMV 146 kb)

References

  1. Ascoli EP, Dandy DS, Leal LG (1990) Buoyancy-driven motion of a deformable drop toward a planar wall at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 213:287–311CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaga D, Weber M (1981) Bubbles in viscous liquids: shapes, wakes, and velocities. J Fluid Mech 105:61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clift R, Grace J, Weber M (2005) Bubbles drops and particles. Dover, Mineola, NY, pp 1–380Google Scholar
  4. Cox RG (1969) The deformation of a drop in a general time-dependent fluid flow. J Fluid Mech 37:601–623CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Ortona U, Salin D, Cieplak M, Rybka R, Banavar J (1995) Two-color nonlinear Boltzmann cellular automata: surface tension and wetting. Phys Rev E 51:3718–3728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grace J (1973) Shapes and velocities of bubbles rising in infinite liquids. Trans Inst Chem Eng Sci 51:116–120Google Scholar
  7. Grunau D, Chen S, Eggert K (1993) A lattice Boltzmann model for multiphase fluid flows. Phys Fluids A 5:2557–2561CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta A, Kumar R (2008) Lattice Boltzmann simulation to study multiple bubble dynamics. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:5192–5203CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Halliday I, Hollis A, Care C (2005) Improved simulation of drop dynamics in a shear flow at low Reynolds number and capillary number. Phys Rev E 73:1–11Google Scholar
  10. Halliday I, Hollis A, Care C (2007) Lattice Boltzmann algorithm for continuum multicomponent flow. Phys Rev E 76:026708-1–026708-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodges S, Jensen O, Rallison J (2004) Sliding, slipping, and rolling: the sedimentation of viscous drop down a gently incline plane. J Fluid Mech 512:95–131CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhaga D, Weber M (1981) Bubbles in viscous liquids: shapes, wakes, and velocities. J Fluid Mech 105:61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Legendre D, Magnaudet J (1998) The lift force on spherical bubble in a viscous linear shear flow. J Fluid Mech 368:81–126CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Lishchuk S, Care C, Halliday I (2003) Lattice Boltzmann algorithm for surface tension with greatly reduced microcurrents. Phys Rev E 67:036701-1–036701-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lister J, Morrison N, Rallison J (2006) Sedimentation of two-dimensional drop toward rigid horizontal plane. J Fluid Mech 552:345–351CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Maini D (2007) VOF Based Multiphase lattice Boltzmann method using explicit kinematic boundary conditions at the interface. University of Georgia Thesis. pp. 1–72Google Scholar
  17. Mortazavi S, Tryggvason G (2000) A numerical study of the motion of drops in Poiseuille flow. Part 1. Lateral migration of one drop. J Fluid Mech 411:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rorres C, Howard A (1984) Applications of linear algebra, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Rostam S, Mahdi M (2009) Solution of a system of two-dimensional linear Fredholm integral equation of the second kind by quadrature methods. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3:1701–1715Google Scholar
  20. Schafer M, Turek S (1996) Benchmark computations of laminar flow around a cylinder. Notes Numer Fluid Mech 52:547–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sukumaran S, Siefert U (2001) Influence of shear flow on vesicles near a wall: a numerical study. Phys Rev E 64:011916-1–011916-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takada N, Misawa M, Tomiyama A, Hosokawa S (2001) Simulation of bubble motion under gravity by lattice Boltzmann method. J Nucl Sci Technol 28:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tolke J, Freudiger S, Krafczyk M (2006) An adaptive scheme using hierarchical grids for lattice Boltzmann multiphase flow simulations. Comput Fluids 35:820–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tolke J, Krafczyk M, Schulz M, Rank E (2002) Lattice Boltzmann simulations of binary fluid flow through porous media. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 360:535–545CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Yiantsio SG, Davis RH (1990) On the buoyancy-driven motion of a drop towards a rigid surface or a deformable interface. J Fluid Mech 217:547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu D, Mei R, Shyy W (2002) A multi-block lattice Boltzmann method for viscous fluid flows. Int J Numer Meth Fluid 39:99–120CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Zou Q, He X (1997) On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Phys Fluids 9:1591–1598CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan Farhat
    • 1
  • Joon Sang Lee
    • 2
  • Sasidhar Kondaraju
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Yonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of (South Korea)
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations