A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms
Chapter
Abstract
The problem of organization is the problem of obtaining cooperation among a collection of individuals or units who share only partially congruent objectives. When a team of individuals collectively produces a single output, there develops the problem of how to distribute the rewards emanating from that output in such a manner that each team member is equitably rewarded. If equitable rewards are not forthcoming, members will, in future cooperative ventures, adjust their efforts in such a manner that all will be somewhat worse off (cf. Simon [41], Marschak [26], Alchian and Demsetz [1]).
Keywords
Market Mechanism Behavior Control Transfer Price Price Mechanism Organizational Control
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Alchian, Armen A. and Demsetz, Harold. ‘Production. Information Costs, and Economic Organization,’ Amer. Econom. Rev., Vol. 62 (1972), pp. 777–795.Google Scholar
- 2.Aldrich, Howard, ‘An Organization-Environment Perspective on Cooperation and Conflict Between Organizations in the Manpower Training System,’ in Anant Negandhi, ed., Conflict and Power in Complex Organizations, Kent State Univ., Kent, Ohio, 1972.Google Scholar
- 3.Argyris, Chris, Integrating the Individual and the Organization, Wiley, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- 4.Arrow, Kenneth J., The Limits of Organization, Norton, New York, 1974, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
- 5.Barnard, Chester I., The Functions of the Executive, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1938.Google Scholar
- 6.Blau, Peter M., The Dynamics of Bureaucracy, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1955.Google Scholar
- 7.— and Scott, W. Richard, Formal Organizations, Scott, Foresman, San Francisco, Calif., 1962.Google Scholar
- 8.Clark, Burton R., The Distinctive College: Antioch, Reed, and Swarthmore, Aldine, Chicago, Ill., 1970.Google Scholar
- 9.Coase, R.H., ‘The Nature of the Firm,’ Economica, New Series. Vol. 4 (1937), pp. 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Cohen, Michael D., March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,’ Admin. Sci. Quart., Vol. 17 (1972), March, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Davis, Stanley M. and Lawrence, Paul R., Matrix, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
- 12.Dore, Ronald, British Factory-Japanese Factory, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1973.Google Scholar
- 13.Etzioni, Amitai, ‘Organizational Control Structure,’ in J.G. March, ed., Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill., 1965, pp. 650–677.Google Scholar
- 14.Evan, William M., ‘The Organization-Set,’ in James D. Thompson. ed., Approaches to Organizational Design, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburg, Pa., 1966.Google Scholar
- 15.Galbraith, Jay, Designing Complex Organizations, Organization Development Series, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
- 16.Gouldner, Alvin W., Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, Free Press, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
- 17.—, ‘The Norm of Reciprocity,’ Amer. Sociological Rev., Vol. 25 (1961), pp. 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hannan, Michael T. and Freeman, John H., ‘The Population Ecology of Organizations,’ Amer. J. Sociology, Vol. 82 (1977), pp. 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kaufman, Herbert, The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative behavior, The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md., 1967.Google Scholar
- 20.Kelman, H.C., ‘Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change,’ J. Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2 (1958), pp. 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lawrence, Paul R. and Lorsch, Jay W., Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, Mass., 1967.Google Scholar
- 22.Light, Ivan H., Ethnic Enterprise in America, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1972.Google Scholar
- 23.Likert, Rensis, The Human Organization: Its Management and Value, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 24.Lipset, Seymour M., Trow, Martin A. and Coleman, James S., Union Democracy, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1956.Google Scholar
- 25.March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A., Organizations, Wiley, New York, 1958.Google Scholar
- 26.Marschak, Thomas A., ‘Economic Theories of Organization,’ in J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill., 1965, pp. 423–450.Google Scholar
- 27.Matthews, Donald R., U.S. Senators and Their World, Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1960.Google Scholar
- 28.Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,’ Amer. J. Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (September 1977), pp. 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Nakane, Chie, Japanese Society, Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1973.Google Scholar
- 30.Ouchi, W.G., and Maguire, M.A., ‘Organizational Contol; Two Functions,’ Admin. Sci. Quart., Vol. 20 (December 1975), pp. 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.—, ‘The Transmission of Control Through Organizational Hierarchy,’ Acad. Management J., Vol. 21, No. 2 (1978).Google Scholar
- 32.Parson, Talcott, Structure and Process in Modern Society, Free Press, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
- 33.Perrow, Charles, Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill., 1972.Google Scholar
- 34.Pfeffer, Jeffrey, ‘Beyond Management and the Worker: The Institutional Function of Management,’ Acad. Management Rev., Vol. 1 (1976), pp. 36–46.Google Scholar
- 35.Reeves, T. Kynaston and Woodward, Joan, ‘The Study of Managerial Control,’ in J. Woodward, ed., Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control, Oxford Univ. Press., London, 1970.Google Scholar
- 36.Roethlisberger, Fritz J. and Dickson, William J., Management and the Worker, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1939.Google Scholar
- 37.Rohlen, Thomas P., For Harmony and Strength: Japanese White-Collar Organization in Anthropological Perspective. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1974.Google Scholar
- 38.Selznick, Philip, TVA and the Grass Roots, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1949.Google Scholar
- 39.Simon, H.A., ‘A Formal Theory of the Employment Relation,’ in H.A. Simon, Models of War, Wiley, New York, 1957, pp. 183–195.Google Scholar
- 40.—, ‘The Architecture of Complexity/ Prox. Amer. Philos. Soc, Vol. 106 (December 1962), pp. 467–482.Google Scholar
- 41.—, ‘On the Concept of Organizational Goal,’ Admin. Sci. Quart., Vol. 9, No. 1 (June 1964), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Tannenbaum, Arnold, Control in Organizations, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
- 43.Thompson, James D., Organizations In Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
- 44.Trist, Eric L. and Bamforth, K.W., ‘Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Goal-Getting, Human Relations, Vol. 4 (February 1951), pp. 3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Vancil, Richard F., ‘What Kind of Management Control Do You Need?,’ in Harvard Business Review — On Management, Harper and Row, New York, 1975, pp. 464–481.Google Scholar
- 46.Weber, Max, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons, Free Press, New York, 1947.Google Scholar
- 47.Weick, Karl E., ‘Educational Organizations As Loosely Coupled Systems,’ Admin. Sci. Quart, Vol. 21 (March 1976), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Williamson, Oliver A., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979