The Gametes

  • Kenneth Maxwell

Abstract

We’ve seen that unicellular species learned in the early dawn of life that sex gave them a leg up on survival in a changing world. At first they did it by clinging together while transferring genetic material. But it was not long, perhaps only a few million years, before they found a more efficient way of doing it. The new way was to use couriers—gametes—to carry on the work of transferring genes to their progeny. The new way proved to be the most durable innovation in the history of life since the invention of sex. The old familiar way of reshuffling their genes accomplished the purpose, but it was clumsy and often wasteful of precious cytoplasm. They did not precipitately switch to the new technique. Many of them continued with the old way for a long time, even after taking on the new.

Keywords

Germ Cell Human Sperm Unicellular Organism Primary Spermatocyte Human Victim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Chapter 4

  1. Ardrey, Robert, The Hunting Hypothesis (New York: Bantam Books, 1976).Google Scholar
  2. Austin, C.R., Fertilization (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965).Google Scholar
  3. Austin, C.R., “Fertilization,” in Reproduction in Mammals I. Germ Cells and Fertilization, ed. C.R. Austin and R.V. Short (London: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 103–133.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, T.G., “Primordial Germ Cells,” in Reproduction in Mammals I. Germ Cells and Fertilization, ed. C.R. Austin and R.V. Short (London: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, David W., ed., Spermatozoan Motility, Publication No. 72 (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1962).Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, R.L., Reproduction and Environment (New York: W.W. Norton, 1968).Google Scholar
  7. Monesi, V., “Spermatogenesis and the Spermatozoa,” in Reproduction in Mammals I. Germ Cells and Fertilization, ed. C.R. Austin and R.V. Short (London: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 46–84.Google Scholar
  8. Rikmenspoel, Robert, “Biophysical Approaches to the Measurement of Sperm Motility,” in Spermatozoon Motility, Publ. No 72. ed. David W. Bishop (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1962), pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
  9. Rosenfeld, Albert, “Controls on Male Fertility Now Seem Within Our Reach,” Smithsonian 8 (July 1977), pp. 36–43.Google Scholar
  10. Rothschild, Lord, “Sperm Movement Problems and Observation,” in SpermatozoanMotility, Publ. No. 72, ed. David W. Bishop (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1962), pp. 13–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenneth Maxwell 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Maxwell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations