Quantum Magnetooptics at High Fields

  • Benjamin Lax
  • Kenneth J. Button

Abstract

Magnetooptics dates back to the discovery by Michael Faraday in 1845 of what is now known as the Faraday effect. Near the turn of the century the more important Zeeman effect was discovered. It was subsequently explained by Lorentz, who considered a classical treatment of a bound electron in a magnetic field. Later, when quantum mechanics was developed, these phenomena were treated more rigorously and the Zeeman effect was then used to elucidate the structure of the atom. The Faraday rotation was treated quantum mechanically by Rosenfeld (1). This treatment only applied to atoms or to discrete impurity states in a host crystal. No significant progress in the treatment of magnetooptical phenomena in solids took place, however, until the 1950’s. Rapid progress then occurred because of a series of timely coincidences in the advancement of technology and the development of theoretical concepts. Technical breakthroughs included the synthesis of pure single crystals of high quality and perfection, the widespread use of low-temperature techniques in the laboratory, the duplication of high-intensity magnetic field facilities, advances in microwave, millimeter wave, and infrared techniques, and, most recently, the introduction of the laser. On the theoretical side the most important development was the recognition of the quantum properties of electrons in a solid in the presence of a magnetic field.

Keywords

Magnetic Field Conduction Band Valence Band Cyclotron Resonance Interband Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Rosenfeld, Z. Physik 57: 835 (1930).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Burstein, G. S. Picus, and H. A. Gebbie, Phys. Rev. 105: 1123 (1957);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Zwerdling and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 106: 51 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    G. Dresselhaus, A. F. Kip, C. Kittel, and G. Wagoner, Phys. Rev. 98: 556 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    R. J. Keyes, S. Zwerdling, S. Foner, H. H. Kolm, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 104: 1804 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    E. Burstein, G. S. Picus, and H. A. Gebbie, Phys. Rev. 103: 825 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    E. O. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1: 249 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    B. Lax and J. G. Mavroides, in: Solid States Physics Vol. 11 (F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    L. M. Roth, B. Lax, and S. Zwerdling, Phys. Rev. 114: 90 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    C. R. Pidgeon and R. N. Brown, Phys. Rev. 146: 575 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 97: 869 (1955);ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. 102: 1030 (1956).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    R. C. Fletcher, W. A. Yaeger, and F. R. Merritt, Phys. Rev. 100: 747 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    J. C. Hensel, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 6: 115 (1961);Google Scholar
  15. 12a.
    J. J. Stickler, H. J. Zeiger, and G. S. Heller, Phys. Rev. 127: 1077 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    K. J. Button, H. A. Gebbie and B. Lax, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE2: 202 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    K. J. Button, B. Lax, and H. A. Gebbie, unpublished.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    C. R. Pidgeon, S. H. Groves, and J. Feinlieb, Solid State Commun. 5: 677 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 16.
    Q. H. F. Vrehen, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29: 129 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 17.
    S. H. Groves, R. N. Brown, and C. R. Pidgeon, Phys. Rev. 161: 779 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 18.
    S. H. Groves, C. R. Pidgeon, A. W. Ewald, and R. J. Wagner, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13: 410 (1968).Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    S. Zwerdling, B. Lax, L. M. Roth, and K. J. Button, Phys. Rev. 114: 80 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 20.
    J. Halpern and B. Lax, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 26: 911 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 21.
    R. L. Aggarwal, M. D. Zuteck, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. Letters 19: 236 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 22.
    Phys. Rev. (to be published).Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    R. N. Brown, J. G. Mavroides, M. S. Dresselhaus, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. Letters 5: 243 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 24.
    R. N. Brown, J. G. Mavroides, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 129: 2055 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 25.
    B. Lax, K. J. Button, H. J. Zeiger, and L. M. Roth, Phys. Rev. 102: 715 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 26.
    M. Maltz, Ph. D. Thesis, MIT Dept. of Electrical Engineering (1968).Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    M. S. Dresselhaus and J. G. Mavroides, IBM J. Res. Develop. 8: 262 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 28.
    P. R. Schroeder, A. Javan, M. S. Dresselhaus, and J. G. Mavroides, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11: 91 (1966).Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    G. Dresselhaus and M. S. Dresselhaus, Proceedings International School of Physics, Enrico Fermi, Varenna, Academic Press, New York, 1966, Course 34, p. 252.Google Scholar
  33. 30.
    M. S. Dresselhaus, private communication.Google Scholar
  34. 31.
    M. S. Dresselhaus and J. G. Mavroides, Phys. Rev. Letters 14: 259 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 32.
    M. Maltz, Ph. D. Thesis, MIT Dept. of Electrical Engineering (1968);Google Scholar
  36. 32a.
    M. S. Maltz, S. Fischler, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11: 917 (1966);Google Scholar
  37. 32a.
    M. S. Maltz and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. Letters, 20: 919 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 33.
    L. V. Keldysh, Soviet Phys.-JETP (English Transl.) 20: 1307 (1965).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 34.
    M. H. Weiler, M. Reine, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev., 171: 949 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 35.
    A. G. Aronov, Soviet Phys.-Solid State (English Transl.) 5: 402 (1963).Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    R. Braunstein and N. Ockman, Phys. Rev. 134: A499 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 37.
    W. Zawadzki, E. Hanamura, and B. Lax, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 12: 100 (1967);Google Scholar
  43. 37a.
    W. Zawadzki, M. H. Weiler, B. Lax, E. Hanamura, K. J. Button, and M. B. Reine, Proceedings Yerevan Conference on Nonlinear Optics, USSR, October 1967, to be published.Google Scholar
  44. 38.
    K. J. Button, B. Lax, M. H. Weiler, and M. B. Reine, Phys. Rev. Letters 17: 1005 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 39.
    C. K. N. Patel, P. A. Fleury, R. E. Slusher, and H. L. Frisch, Phys. Rev. Letters 16: 971 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 40.
    B. Lax, J. G. Mavroides, H. J. Zeiger, and R. J. Keyes, Phys. Rev. 122: 31 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 41.
    J. J. Stickler, H. J. Zeiger, and G. S. Heller, Phys. Rev. 127: 1077 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 42.
    M. H. Weiler, W. Zawadzki, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 163: 733 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Lax
    • 1
  • Kenneth J. Button
    • 1
  1. 1.Francis Bitter National Magnet LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations