Physics of Solids in Intense Magnetic Fields pp 145-183 | Cite as
Quantum Magnetooptics at High Fields
Abstract
Magnetooptics dates back to the discovery by Michael Faraday in 1845 of what is now known as the Faraday effect. Near the turn of the century the more important Zeeman effect was discovered. It was subsequently explained by Lorentz, who considered a classical treatment of a bound electron in a magnetic field. Later, when quantum mechanics was developed, these phenomena were treated more rigorously and the Zeeman effect was then used to elucidate the structure of the atom. The Faraday rotation was treated quantum mechanically by Rosenfeld (1). This treatment only applied to atoms or to discrete impurity states in a host crystal. No significant progress in the treatment of magnetooptical phenomena in solids took place, however, until the 1950’s. Rapid progress then occurred because of a series of timely coincidences in the advancement of technology and the development of theoretical concepts. Technical breakthroughs included the synthesis of pure single crystals of high quality and perfection, the widespread use of low-temperature techniques in the laboratory, the duplication of high-intensity magnetic field facilities, advances in microwave, millimeter wave, and infrared techniques, and, most recently, the introduction of the laser. On the theoretical side the most important development was the recognition of the quantum properties of electrons in a solid in the presence of a magnetic field.
Keywords
Magnetic Field Conduction Band Valence Band Cyclotron Resonance Interband TransitionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.L. Rosenfeld, Z. Physik 57: 835 (1930).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.E. Burstein, G. S. Picus, and H. A. Gebbie, Phys. Rev. 105: 1123 (1957);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- S. Zwerdling and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 106: 51 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.G. Dresselhaus, A. F. Kip, C. Kittel, and G. Wagoner, Phys. Rev. 98: 556 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.R. J. Keyes, S. Zwerdling, S. Foner, H. H. Kolm, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 104: 1804 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.E. Burstein, G. S. Picus, and H. A. Gebbie, Phys. Rev. 103: 825 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.E. O. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1: 249 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.B. Lax and J. G. Mavroides, in: Solid States Physics Vol. 11 (F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
- 8.L. M. Roth, B. Lax, and S. Zwerdling, Phys. Rev. 114: 90 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.C. R. Pidgeon and R. N. Brown, Phys. Rev. 146: 575 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 97: 869 (1955);ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. 102: 1030 (1956).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. C. Fletcher, W. A. Yaeger, and F. R. Merritt, Phys. Rev. 100: 747 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J. C. Hensel, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 6: 115 (1961);Google Scholar
- 12a.J. J. Stickler, H. J. Zeiger, and G. S. Heller, Phys. Rev. 127: 1077 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.K. J. Button, H. A. Gebbie and B. Lax, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics QE2: 202 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.K. J. Button, B. Lax, and H. A. Gebbie, unpublished.Google Scholar
- 15.C. R. Pidgeon, S. H. Groves, and J. Feinlieb, Solid State Commun. 5: 677 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Q. H. F. Vrehen, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29: 129 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.S. H. Groves, R. N. Brown, and C. R. Pidgeon, Phys. Rev. 161: 779 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.S. H. Groves, C. R. Pidgeon, A. W. Ewald, and R. J. Wagner, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13: 410 (1968).Google Scholar
- 19.S. Zwerdling, B. Lax, L. M. Roth, and K. J. Button, Phys. Rev. 114: 80 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.J. Halpern and B. Lax, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 26: 911 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.R. L. Aggarwal, M. D. Zuteck, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. Letters 19: 236 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Phys. Rev. (to be published).Google Scholar
- 23.R. N. Brown, J. G. Mavroides, M. S. Dresselhaus, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. Letters 5: 243 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.R. N. Brown, J. G. Mavroides, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 129: 2055 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.B. Lax, K. J. Button, H. J. Zeiger, and L. M. Roth, Phys. Rev. 102: 715 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.M. Maltz, Ph. D. Thesis, MIT Dept. of Electrical Engineering (1968).Google Scholar
- 27.M. S. Dresselhaus and J. G. Mavroides, IBM J. Res. Develop. 8: 262 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.P. R. Schroeder, A. Javan, M. S. Dresselhaus, and J. G. Mavroides, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11: 91 (1966).Google Scholar
- 29.G. Dresselhaus and M. S. Dresselhaus, Proceedings International School of Physics, Enrico Fermi, Varenna, Academic Press, New York, 1966, Course 34, p. 252.Google Scholar
- 30.M. S. Dresselhaus, private communication.Google Scholar
- 31.M. S. Dresselhaus and J. G. Mavroides, Phys. Rev. Letters 14: 259 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.M. Maltz, Ph. D. Thesis, MIT Dept. of Electrical Engineering (1968);Google Scholar
- 32a.M. S. Maltz, S. Fischler, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 11: 917 (1966);Google Scholar
- 32a.M. S. Maltz and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. Letters, 20: 919 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.L. V. Keldysh, Soviet Phys.-JETP (English Transl.) 20: 1307 (1965).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 34.M. H. Weiler, M. Reine, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev., 171: 949 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.A. G. Aronov, Soviet Phys.-Solid State (English Transl.) 5: 402 (1963).Google Scholar
- 36.R. Braunstein and N. Ockman, Phys. Rev. 134: A499 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.W. Zawadzki, E. Hanamura, and B. Lax, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 12: 100 (1967);Google Scholar
- 37a.W. Zawadzki, M. H. Weiler, B. Lax, E. Hanamura, K. J. Button, and M. B. Reine, Proceedings Yerevan Conference on Nonlinear Optics, USSR, October 1967, to be published.Google Scholar
- 38.K. J. Button, B. Lax, M. H. Weiler, and M. B. Reine, Phys. Rev. Letters 17: 1005 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.C. K. N. Patel, P. A. Fleury, R. E. Slusher, and H. L. Frisch, Phys. Rev. Letters 16: 971 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.B. Lax, J. G. Mavroides, H. J. Zeiger, and R. J. Keyes, Phys. Rev. 122: 31 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.J. J. Stickler, H. J. Zeiger, and G. S. Heller, Phys. Rev. 127: 1077 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.M. H. Weiler, W. Zawadzki, and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. 163: 733 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar