The Evaluation of Treatment Methods by Rating and Self-Rating Scales

  • Detlev von Zerssen

Abstract

In spite of the widespread and still increasing use of rating as well as self-rating scales in the evaluation of psychiatric treatment methods there is as yet a lot of skepticism among clinicians as to the utility of these devices. At best, they argue, will the application of such scales confirm what good clinicians already know. But do they, indeed, know so much about the efficacy and the side effects of the various treatment methods in the large variety of mental disorders and is there always agreement among them? General experience does not concord with such assumptions! Nevertheless, in one respect clinical conceptions are thoroughly confirmed by statistical analyses of data collected by means of rating scales: If these scales include a large set of items covering, more or less, the total spectrum of psychopathological symptoms as described in textbooks of clinical psychiatry and if item scores were obtained from large and diagnostically heterogeneous samples of psychiatric patients representative of a newly admitted hospital population, then the application of various kinds of factor- as well as cluster-analyses to the data usually reveals symptom patterns that correspond very closely to the textbook descriptions of the main syndromes of psychopathology. The factors of the well-known Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale (IMPS: 1) are a good example for this agreement between statistically and clinically conceived syndromes (2,3,4).

Keywords

Psychopathological Symptom Depressive Syndrome Hamilton Depression Scale Neuroleptic Medication Schizophrenic Psychos 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Lorr, Assessing psychotic behavior by the IMPS, in: “Psychological Measurements in Psychopharmacology,” P. Pichot and R. Olivier-Martin, eds., Karger, Basel — Munich — Paris — London — New York — Sydney (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Mombour, G. Gammel, D. von Zerssen, and H. Heyse, Die Objektivierung psychiatrischer Syndrome durch multifaktorielle Analyse des psychopathologischen Befundes, Nervenarzt 44:352 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. von Zerssen and C. Cording, The measurement of change in endogenous affective disorders, Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr. 226:95 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Cairns, D. von Zerssen, K. H. Stutte, and W. Mombour, The stability of the symptom groupings in the Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale (IMPS), J. psychiat. Res. 17:19 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. von Zerssen, Self-rating scales in the evaluation of psychiatric treatment, in: “Methods in Evaluation of Psychiatric Treatment,” T. Helgason, ed., Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Fahy, Some problems in the assessment of current mental status of depressed patients, in: “Das depressive Syndrom,” H. Hippius and H. Selbach, eds., Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich — Berlin — Vienna (1969).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. W. K. Zung, A self-rating depression scale, Arch. gen. Psychiat. 12:63 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Arfwidsson, G. d’Elia, B. Laurell, J.-O. Ottosson, C. Perris, and G. Persson, Can self-rating replace doctor’s rating in evaluating anti-depressive treatment?, Acta psychiat. scand. 50:16 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. von Zerssen, in collaboration with D.-M. Koeller, Klinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (KSb-S) aus dem Münchener Psychiatrischen Informations-System (PSYCHIS München), Manuale. a) Allgemeiner Teil; b) Die Beschwerden-Liste; c) Paranoid-Depressivitäts-Skala. Depressivitäts-Skala; d) Die Befindlichkeits-Skala, Beltz, Weinheim (1976a-d).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. von Zerssen, Clinical Selfrating-Scales (CSr-S) of the Munich Psychiatric Information System (PSYCHIS München), in: “Assessment of Depression,” N. Sartorius and T. A. Ban, eds., University Park Press, Baltimore (in press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Hamilton, Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness, Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol. 6:278 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. P. Bobon, Y. D. Lapierre, and T. Lottin, Validity and sensitivity of the French version of the Zerssen BfS/BfS’ self-rating mood scale during treatment with trazodone and amitriptyline, Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol. Psychiat. 5:519 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. S. Haskell, A. DiMascio, and B. Prusoff, Rapidity of symptom reduction in depressions treated with amitriptyline, J. nerv. ment. Dis. 160:24 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Woggon, “Prognose der Psychopharmakotherapie,” Enke, Stuttgart (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    U. Baumann and R.-D. Stieglitz, “Testmanual zum AMDP-System,” Springer, Berlin — Heidelberg — New York — Tokyo (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Kissling, H. J. Möller, H. Lauter, S. Kraemer, U. Binz, and G. Wendt, Doppelblindvergleich von Maprotilin (Ludiomir®) i. v. versus oral, in: “Der depressiv Kranke in der Klinik,” M. Wolfersdorf, R. Straub, and G. Hole, eds., Beltz, Weinheim (in press).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.-J. Möller, W. Kissling, C. Lang, P. Doerr, K.-M. Pirke, and D. von Zerssen, Efficacy and side effects of haloperidol in psychotic patients: oral versus intravenous administration, Amer. J. Psychiat. 139:1571 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. von Zerssen, Psychopathometrische Verfahren und ihre Anwendung in der Psychiatrie, in: “Die Psychologie des 20. Jahrhunderts,” U. H. Peters, ed., Kindler, Zurich (1980).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. J. Möller and D. von Zerssen, Depressive states occurring during the neuroleptic treatment of schizophrenia, Schizophr. Bull. 8:109 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Knights and S. R. Hirsch, ‘Revealed’ depression and drug treatment for schizophrenia, Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 38:806 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Detlev von Zerssen
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für PsychiatrieMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations