Contemporary Electroanalytical Chemistry pp 173-181 | Cite as
Biosensing Based on Gas Sensitive Semiconductor Devices
Abstract
The combination of catalytic metals and semiconductor devices has led to chemical sensors which appear to have both technical and medical applications.1–5 More particularly, metal insulator semiconductor structures with the metal gate consisting of thin, discontinuous, iridium or platinum layers, have a large sensitivity to molecular ammonia.6–9 These structures are so-called field effect devices which can be constructed, e.g., in the form of capacitors (Fig.1(a)) or transistors (Fig. 1(b)). It was observed several years ago that hydrogen gas could shift the electrical characteristics of such devices along the voltage axis if the metal gate was made of a catalytic metal, namely palladium.10 For these devices where the metal gate was thick enough to be continuous and non-porous, the voltage shift is due to hydrogen atoms adsorbed at the metal-insulator interface where they give rise to a dipole layer changing the work function of the metal at the metal-insulator interface (see Fig.2(a)). It was found, however, that this type of device was only to a very small extent sensitive to ammonia, although ammonia molecules can be dehydrogenated on a number of catalytic metal surfaces. Since ammonia molecules (or rather ammonium ions) are produced in a large number of biochemical reactions, we found it of interest to develop a field effect structure sensitive to ammonia. It was discovered that gates of catalytic metal films thin enough (of the order of 10 nm) to be discontinuous gave the field effect devices a large ammonia sensitivity. The details behind the ammonia sensitivity are not fully understood yet.
Keywords
Urease Activity Metal Insulator Semiconductor Voltage Shift Ammonia Molecule Catalytic MetalPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.I. Lundström and C. Svensson, in: “Solid State Chemical Sensors”, J. Janata and R.J. Huber (Eds), Academic Press, New York, 1985, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
- 2.I. Lundström, M. Armgarth, A. Spetz and F. Winquist, Sensors and Actuators, 10 (1986) 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.A. Sibbald, Journal of Molecular Electronics, 2 (1986) 51.Google Scholar
- 4.F. Winquist, A. Spetz, M. Armgarth, I. Lundström and B. Danielsson, Sensors and Actuators, 8 (1985) 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.I. Lundström, A. Spetz and F. Winquist, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 361, (1987) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. Spetz, F. Winquist, C. Nylander and I. Lundström, Proc. Int. Meeting Chemical Sensors, Fukuoka, 1983 p. 479.Google Scholar
- 7.F. Winquist, A. Spetz, M. Armgarth, C. Nylander and I. Lundström, Appl. Phys. Lett., 43 (1983) 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.A. Spetz, M. Armgarth and I. Lundström, Sensors and Actuators, 11 (1987) 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J.F. Ross, I. Robins and B.C. Webb, Sensors and Actuators, 11 (1987) 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.I. Lundström, M.S. Shivaraman, C.M. Svensson and L. Lundkvist, Appl. Phys. Lett. 26 (1975) 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.F. Winquist, A. Spetz, I. Lundström and B. Danielsson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 163 (1984) 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.F. Winquist, I. Lundström and B. Danielsson, Anal. Chem., 58 (1986) 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.F. Winquist, I. Lundström and B. Danielsson, Anal. Lett., 21 (1988) 1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sensistor AB, P.O. Box 76, S-581 01, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
- 15.F. Winquist, A. Spetz, I. Lundström and B. Danielsson, Anal, Chim. Acta, 164 (1984) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.B. Walter, Anal. Chem., 55 (1983) 498A.Google Scholar
- 17.B. Mattiasson, B. Danielsson, C. Hermansson and K. Mosbach, FEBS Lett., 85 (1978) 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.U. Ackelid, M. Armgarth, A. Spetz and I. Lundström, IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-7, (1986) 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.F. Winquist and I. Lundström, Sensors and Actuators, 12 (1987) 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.U. Ackelid, F. Winquist and I. Lundström, Proc. 2nd Int. Meeting Chemical Sensors, Bordeaux, 1986, p. 395.Google Scholar
- 21.M. Armgarth, U. Ackelid and I. Lundström, Digest of Technical Papers, Transducers ′87, Tokyo, 1987, p. 640.Google Scholar