Advertisement

Principles of Behavior Modification

  • Ennio Cipani
Chapter
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

The field of behavior modification, or applied behavior analysis, is distinguished from other approaches in several ways. The fundamental characteristics and properties of the behavioral approach were identified in an article appearing in the first issue of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Baer, Wolf, & Risley, 1968). One set of properties identified in this landmark article was the methodological requirements of applied behavior analysis. The methodology was characterized by four unique requirements. The empirical focus was on observable behavior, or rate of response, in contrast to inferred states of feelings. Second, the analytical orientation involving the experimental analysis of functional relationships between variables was the primary focus of research. Third, the utilization of within-subject analyses, controlling experimentally for potential confounding variables (in contrast to statistical control), was the preferred method of studying human behavior. Finally, the applied component of the field dictated that socially relevant problems be the subject of research, and that effective technologies be developed which produce practically significant changes in behavior (Kazdin, 1977; Wolf, 1978).

Keywords

Stimulus Control Discriminative Stimulus Behavior Analysis Apply Behavior Analysis Differential Reinforcement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azrin, N. H., and Armstrong, P. M. (1973). “The mini-meal”: A method for teaching eating skills to the profoundly retarded. Mental Retardation, 11, 9–11.Google Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., Schaeffer, R. M., and Wesolowski, M. D. (1976). A rapid method of teaching profoundly retarded persons to dress by a reinforcement-guidance method. Mental Retardation, 14, 29–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., and Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. S., and Bostow, D. E. (1981). Research methods in applied behavior analysis. Tallahassee, FL: Copy Grafix.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, B. L., Brightman, A. J., Heifetz, L. J., and Murphy, D. N. (1976). Steps to independence: A skills training series for children with special needs. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, W. C., and Engelmann, S. (1974). Achievement gains of disadvantaged children with IQ’s under 80 in follow through (Tech. Rep. No. 74–2 ). Eugene: University of Oregon Follow Through Project.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, W. C. and Engelmann, S. E. (1978). Systems for basic instruction: Theory and applications. In A. Catania and T. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and instructional processes. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  8. Bender, M., and Valletutti, P. J. (1976). Teaching the moderately and severely handicapped: Curriculum objectives, strategies and activities. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bensberg, G. J., Colwell, C. N. and Cassell, R. H. (1965). Teaching the profoundly retarded self-help activities by behavior shaping techniques. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 69, 674679.Google Scholar
  10. Carnine, D. W. (1980). Three procedures for presenting minimally different positive and negative instances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 452–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catania, A. C. (1984). Learning ( 2nd ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Cipani, E. (1987). Errorless learning technology: Theory, research and practice. In J. L. Matson and R. P. Barett (Eds.), Advances in developmental disorder (pp. 237–275 ).Google Scholar
  13. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Cipani, E., and Madigan, K. (1987). Errorless learning: Research and application for “difficult-to-teach” children. Canadian Journal of Exceptional Children, 3, 39–43.Google Scholar
  14. Cipani, E., Augustine, A., and Blomgren, E. (1982). Teaching severely and profoundly retarded adults to ascend stairs safely. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 51–54.Google Scholar
  15. Drabman, R. S., Hammer, D., and Rosenbaum, M. S. (1979). Assessing generalization in behavior modification with children: The generalization map. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 203–219.Google Scholar
  16. Englemann, S., and Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  17. Ferster, C. B., and Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foxx, R. M. (1982). Increasing behaviors of severely retarded and autistic persons. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gobbi, L., Cipani, E., Hudson, C., and Lapenta, R. (1986). Developing “spontaneous requesting” among children with severe mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 24, 357–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Halle, J. W., Marshall, A. M. and Spradlin, J. E. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 431–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homer, R. D., and Keilitz, I. (1975). Training mentally retarded adolescents to brush their teeth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Homer, R. H., Sprague, J., and Wilcox, B. (1982). Constructing general case programs for community activities. In B. Wilcox and T. Bellamy (Eds.), Design of high school for severely handicapped students (pp. 61–98 ). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  23. Homer, R. H., Bellamy, G. T. and Colvin, G. T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 287–296.Google Scholar
  24. Homer, R. H., Eberhard, J. M. and Sheehan, M. R. (1986). Teaching generalized table bussing: The importance of negative teaching examples. Behavior Modification, 10, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koegel, R. L., and Rincover, A. (1976). Some detrimental effects of using extra-stimuli to guide learning in normal and autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 59–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovaas, O. I., Berberich, J. P., Perloff, B. F., and Schaeffer, B. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children. Science, 151, 705–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., and Rehm, R. (1971). Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., and Schreibman, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1236–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael, J. (1987). Advanced topics of behavior analysis. San Mateo, CA: Northern Association for Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  31. Popovich, D. (1983). Effective educational and behavioral programming for severely and profoundly handicapped students: A manual for teachers and aides. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  32. Repp, A. C., and Brulle, A. R. (1981). Reducing aggressive behavior of mentally retarded persons. In J. L. Matson and J. R. McCarthy (Eds.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded (pp. 177–210 ). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning (2nd ed.). Glenview: IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  34. Rodewald, H. K. (1979). Stimulus control of behavior. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schilmoeller, K. J., and Etzel, B. C. (1977a). A review of errorless stimulus control: Implications for a technology of errorless programming. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Department of Human Development, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  36. Schreibman, L. (1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 91–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smeets, P. M., and Striefel, S. (1976). Acquisition of sign reading by transfer of stimulus control in a deaf retarded girl. Journal of Mental Deficiency, 20, 197–205.Google Scholar
  39. Stokes, T. F., and Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 457–471.Google Scholar
  40. Stolz, S. B., and Wolf, M. M. (1969). Visually discriminated behavior in a “blind” adolescent retardate. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Striefel, S., Bryan, K. S., and Aikins, D. A. (1974). Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 123–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Touchette, P., and Howard, J. S. (1984). Errorless learning: Reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 175188.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, L. S. (1978). A management system approach to teaching independent living skills and managing disruptive behavior. Tuscaloosa, AL: Behavior Modification Technology.Google Scholar
  46. Weisburg, P., Packer, R. A. and Weisburg, R. S. (1981). Academic training. In J. L. Matson and J. R. McCartney (Eds.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded (pp. 331–411 ). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitman, T. L., Scibak, J. W., and Reid, D. H. (1983). Behavior modification with the severely and profoundly retarded: Research and application. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ennio Cipani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of the PacificStocktonUSA

Personalised recommendations