Resource Competition in Wild Populations of Ringtailed Lemurs (Lemur Catta): Implications for Female Dominance

  • Michelle L. Sauther

Abstract

Stresses imposed on female lemurs by adapting their reproductive events to seasonal resource availability may be exacerbated by high pre- and post-natal maternal investment and by group living. Within such a context female dominance can be seen as a critical behavior, enabling females to coexist with more than one non-natal male within a highly seasonal environment. Females may tolerate year-round male membership as males provide low-cost sentinels for predator detection and defense. Furthermore, male membership may be a viable reproductive tactic for both females and males, especially because females mate first with group males. A combination of female choice of small males and ecological and reproductive constraints on male size may have led to the current system of female dominance in ringtailed lemurs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J., 1974, Observational study of behavior: sampling methods, Behaviour 49: 227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann, J., 1990, Primate males go where the females are. Anim. Behay. 39: 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andelman, S.J., 1986, Ecological and social determinants of cercopithecine mating patterns, in: “Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution,” D. I. Rubenstein, and R.W. Wrangham, eds., Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Busse, C.D., 1976, Chimpanzee predation as a possible factor in the evolution of red colobus monkey social organization, Evolution 31: 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheney, D.L., and Wrangham, R.W., 1987, Predation in: “Primate Societies,” B.B. Smuts, D.L., Cheney, R.M Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, and T.T. Struhsaker, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Charles-Dominique, P., and Petter, J.J., 1980, Ecology and social life of Phaner furcifer, in: “Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology and Behavior,” P. Charles-Dominique, H.M. Cooper, A. Hladik, E. Pages, G.F. Pariente, A. Petter-Rousseaux, J.J. Petter, and A. Schilling, eds., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock, T.H., 1985, Size, sexual dimorphism, and phylogeny in primates, in: “Size and Scaling in Primate Biology” W.L. Jungers, ed., Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. and Guiness, F.E., 1989, Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals, Nature 337: 360.Google Scholar
  9. Edington, E.S., 1980, “Randomization Tests,” Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, C.S., and Goy, R.W., 1968, Social behaviour and reproductive cycles in captive ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur cafta), J. Zool. 156: 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furuichi, T., 1983, Interindividual distance and influence of dominance on feeding in a natural Japanese macaque troop, Primates 24: 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganzhorn, J.U., 1985, Habitat separation of semifree-ranging Lemur catta and Lemur fulvus, Folia Primato!. 45: 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hrdy, S.B., 1981, “The Woman That Never Evolved,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Jolly, A., 1966, “Lemur Behavior,” University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Jolly, A., 1967, Breeding synchrony in lemurs, in: “Social Communication among Primates,” SA. Altmann, ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Jolly, A. 1984, The puzzle of female feeding priority. in: “Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists,” M.F. Small, ed., Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Kappeler, P.M., 1990a, Female dominance in Lemur cotta: more than just female feeding priority?, Folio Primatol. 55: 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kappeler, P.M., 1990b, The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates, Am. J. Primatol. 21: 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kappeler, P.M., 1991, Patterns of sexual dimorphism in body weight among prosimian primates, Folio Primatol. 57: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaufman, R., 1991, Female dominance in semifree-ranging black and white ruffed lemurs, Varecia variegata variegata, Folio Primatol. 57: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leutenegger, W, and Kelly J.T., 1977, Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates, Primates 18: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manly, B.F.J., 1991, “Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology,” Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Mori, A., 1977, Intra-troop spacing mechanisms among Japanese monkeys, Primates 14: 113.Google Scholar
  24. Noreen, E.W., 1989, “Computer-intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction,” John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Pagès-Feuillade, E., 1988, Modalités de l’occupation de l’espace et relations interindividuelles chez un prosimien nocturne malagache (Microcebus murinus), Folio Primatol. 50: 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pereira, M.E., 1991, Asynchrony within estrous synchrony among ringtailed lemurs (Primates: Lemuridae), Physiol. Behay. 49: 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pereira, M.E., and Weiss, M.L., 1991, Female mate choice, male migration, and the threat of infanticide in ringtailed lemurs, Behay. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereira, M.E., Kaufman, R., Kappeler, P.M., and Overdorff, D.J., 1990, Female dominance does not characterize all of the Lemuridae, Folia Primatol. 55: 96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perret, M., 1982, Influence du groupement social sur la reproduction de la femelle de Microcebus murinus, Z. Terpsychol. 60: 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pollock, J.I., 1979, Female dominance in Indri indri, Folia Primatol. 30: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rendall, D., 1993, Does female social precedence characterize captive aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis)?, Int. J. Primatol. 14: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richard, A.F., and Heimbuch, R., 1975, An analysis of the social behavior of three groups of Propithecus verreauxi, in: “Lemur Biology,” I. Tattersall, and R.W. Sussman, eds., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Robbins, C.T., 1983, “Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition,” Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, J.G., 1981, Spatial structure in foraging groups of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys Cebus nigrivittatus, Anim. Behay. 29: 1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sadleir, R.M.F.S., 1969, “The Ecology of Reproduction in Wild and Domestic Mammals,’ Methuen and Co., London.Google Scholar
  36. Sauther, M.L., 1989, Antipredator behavior in troops of free-ranging Lemur cafta at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar, Int. J. Primatol. 10: 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sauther, M.L., 1991a, Reproductive costs in free-ranging ringtailed lemurs, Am. J. Primatol. 24: 133.Google Scholar
  38. Sauther, M.L., 1991b, Reproductive behavior of free-ranging Lemur catta at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 84: 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sauther, M.L., 1992, The Effect of Reproductive State, Social Rank, and Group Size on Resource Use Among Free-ranging Ringtailed Lemurs (Lemur cotta) of Madagascar, Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  40. Sauther, M.L., 1993, Changes in the use of wild plant foods in free-ranging ringtailed lemurs during lactation and pregnancy: Some implications for early hominid foraging strategies, in: “Eating on the Wild Side: The Pharmacologic, Ecologic, and Social Implications of Using Noncultigens,” N.L. Etkin, ed., University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  41. Schilling, A., 1979, Olfactory communication in prosimians, in: “The Study of Prosimian Behavior,” GA. Doyle, and R.D. Martin, eds., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Smuts, B.B., 1987, Gender, aggression, and influence, in: “Primate Societies,” B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, and T.T. Struhsaker, eds., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Sussman, R.W., 1972, An ecological study of two Madagascan Primates: Lemur fulvus ntfus (Audebert) and Lemur catta (Linnaeus), Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham.Google Scholar
  44. Sussman, R.W., 1974, Ecological distinctions of sympatric species of Lemur, in: “Prosimian Biology,” R.D. Martin, G.A. Doyle, and A.C. Walker, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  45. Sussman, R.W., 1977, Socialization, social structure, and ecology of two sympatric species of Lemur, in: “Primate Bio-social Development: Biological, Social, and Ecological Determinants,” S. ChevalierSkolnikoff, and F.E. Poirier, eds., Garland Publishing, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  46. Sussman, R.W., 1991, Demography and social organization of free-ranging Lemur cafta in the Beza Mahafaly Reserve, Madagascar, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 84: 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tattersall, I., 1982, “The Primates of Madagascar,” Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, L., 1986, Kinship, Dominance, and Social Organization in a Semi Free-ranging Group of Ringtailed Lemurs (Lemur catta), Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  49. Terborgh J., and Janson, C.H., 1986, The socioecology of primate groups, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Trivers, R.L., 1972, Parental investment and sexual selection, in: “Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man,” B. Cambell, ed., Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  51. van Horn, R.N., and Resko, JA., 1977, Reproductive cycle of the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur cafta): Sex steroid levels and sexual receptivity under controlled photoperiods, Endocrinology 101: 1579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolfheim, J.H., 1977, A quantitative analysis of the organization of a group of captive talapoin monkeys (Miopithecus talapoin), Folia Primatol. 27: 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wrangham, R.W., 1980, An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups, Behaviour 75: 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Young, A.L., Richard, A.F., and Aiello, L.C., 1990, Female dominance and maternal investment in strepsirhine primates, Am. Nat. 135: 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle L. Sauther
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations