Ordinal Pattern Analysis

A Strategy for Assessing Hypotheses about Individuals
  • Warren Thorngate
  • Barbara Carroll
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Our task in writing this chapter is to outline a strategy for analyzing data that we believe to be better suited to most psychological research than the most widely used statistical techniques (e.g., t, F, and chi square tests, product moment correlation, regression, covariance, discriminant, and factor analyses). We call the strategy Ordinal Pattern Analysis (OPA), and derive it from a small set of first principles that deviate somewhat from those on which most classical statistical models are based. First, we assume that the goal of statistical practice is to aid in detecting and analyzing patterns in data rather than to aid in making decisions about populations given samples of data. Second, we assume that a statistic must be useful in analyzing data generated by individual subjects as well as data based on aggregations of subjects. Third, we assume that most predictions and observations in psychological research possess no more than ordinal scale properties, and that statistics employed to assess the fit between predictions and observations must be derived on the basis of this constraint.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishop, Y., Feinberg, S., & Holland, P. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, J. (1968). Distribution free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, R. R. (1963). Estimation and evaluation. In R. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 429–469). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Diaconis, P., & Efron, B. (1983, May). Computer intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, pp. 116-130.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, A. W. F. (1972). Likelihood: An account of the statistical concept of likelihood and its application to scientific inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hildebrand, D., Laing, J., & Rosenthal, H. (1977). Prediction analysis of cross classifications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Kendall, M. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81–93.Google Scholar
  8. Meehl, P. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Restle, F. (1970). Introduction to mathematical psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Restle, F., & Greeno, J. (1970). Introduction to mathematical psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Savage, L. (1954). Foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Thorngate, W. (1976). Possible limits on a science of social behavior. In L. Strickland, F. Aboud, & K. Gergen (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 121–139). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren Thorngate
    • 1
  • Barbara Carroll
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations