A Mathematical Description of the Critical Heat Flux as a Non-Linear Dynamic Instability

  • Pablo Carrica
  • Alejandro Clausse

Abstract

The thermofluid dynamics of pool boiling heat transfer was theoretically studied. A two-phase flow integral model was formulated for the local boiling field adjacent to the heated wall. A set of three non-linear differential equations model the dynamics of the localized void fraction, bubble number density and vapor velocity. The boiling crisis at the critical heat flux is described as a dynamic transition caused by the competition of bubbles coalescence and breakup mechanisms. An analysis of a case of pool boiling in water is presented, showing the consistency of the formulation. The model has potential applications to thermal management of electronic microchips and devices for space environments.

Keywords

Heat Flux Control Volume Void Fraction Critical Heat Flux Boiling Heat Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Delhaye, J. M., 1968, “Equations fondamentales des ecoulements diphasiques”, Partes 1 et 2, CEA-R-3429, Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires de Grenoble, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. Drew, D., Cheng, L. and R. T. Lahey Jr., 1979, “The analysis of virtual mass effects in two-phase flow”, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 5:233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hsu, Y. Y. and Graham, R. W., 1976, “Transport Processes in Boiling and Two-Phase System”, McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Kataoka, I. and Serizawa, A., 1990, “Interfacial area concentration in bubbly flows, Noc. Enq,. Des., 120:163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kocamustafaogullari, G. and Ishii, M., 1983, “Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling systems”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 26:1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kutateladze S., 1948, “On the transition to film boiling under natural convection”, Kotlaturbastroeine, 3:10Google Scholar
  7. Liaw, S. P. and Dhir, V. K., 1989, “Void fraction measurements during saturated pool boiling of water on partially wetted vertical surfaces”, J. Heat Transfer, 111, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lienhard, J, 1988, “Things we don’t know about boiling heat transfer”, Int. Gamm. Heat. Mass Trans., 15:401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Navarro-Valenti, S., Clausse, A., Drew, D. and R. T. Lahey, 1991, “A contribution to the mathematical modeling of bubbly-slug flow regime transition”, Chem. Enq. Comm., 102:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prince, M and Blanch, H., 1990, “Bubble coalescence and breakup in air-sparged bubble columns, AICHE J., 36:1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor, G. I., 1934, “The formation of emulsion in definable field of flow”, Proceeding of the Royal Society (London), 146:501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallis, G., 1969, “One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow”, McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  13. Zuber, N., 1958, “On the stability of boiling heat transfer”, Trans. AIME, 80:711Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Carrica
    • 1
  • Alejandro Clausse
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Atomico BarilocheBarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations