The Double-Bind Concept and Gregory Bateson

  • Robert W. Rieber
  • Harold J. Vetter
Chapter
Part of the Cognition and Language book series (CALS)

Abstract

Sullivan (1944) has expressed the belief that language serves the vital function of preserving feelings of security among one’s fellow human beings. The schizophrenic’s peculiarities of language, he proposes, arise from an extreme need to feel secure. The schizophrenic does not believe that speech will help attain gratification; instead, it is used to counteract feelings of insecurity. The problem lies in recurrent severe disturbances in the schizophrenic’s relationships with people that result in a confusion of the critical faculties concerning the structure of spoken and written language.

Keywords

Family Therapy Double Bind Schizophrenic Child Pathological Communication Intense Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1963). A note on the double bind. Family Process, 2, 154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, A. (1965). A test of the double bind hypothesis of schizophrenia. Family Process, 4, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, N. (1944). Experimental analysis of schizophrenic thinking. In J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and thought in schizophrenia (pp. 50–64). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chaika, E. O. (1990). Understanding psychotic speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  8. Ciotola, R. (1961). The effect of two contradictory levels of reward and censure on schizophrenia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 320. (University microfilms No. 2278, 61).Google Scholar
  9. Coser, R. (1960). Laughter among colleagues. Psychiatry, 23, 81–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira, A. (1960). The double-bind and delinquent behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry, 3, 359–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haley, J. (1955). Paradoxes in play, fantasy, and psychotherapy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 52–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  13. Haley, J. (1964). Research on family patterns: An instrumental measure. Family Process, 3, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haley, J. (1967). Speech sequences of normal and abnormal families with two children present. Family Process, 6, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson, D. (1960). The etiology of schizophrenia. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, D. (1961). Interactional psychotherapy. In M. Stein (Ed.), Contemporary psychotherapies (pp. 250–251). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, D., & Haley, J. (1963). Transference revisited. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 137, 363–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones, D. M. (1964). Binds and unbinds. Family Process, 3, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasanin, J. S. (1944). The disturbance of conceptual thinking in schizophrenia. In J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and thought in schizophrenia (pp. 41–49). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Loeff, R. (1966). Differential discrimination of conflicting emotional messages by normal, delinquent, and schizophrenic adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 26, 6850–6851. (University Microfilms No. 1470, 66).Google Scholar
  21. Lu, Y. (1962). Contradictory parental expectations in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 6, 219–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mishler, E., & Waxler, N. (1965). Family interaction processes and schizophrenia. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 11, 269–315.Google Scholar
  23. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Potash, H. (1965) Schizophrenic interaction and the conception of the double-bind. Dissertation Abstracts International, 25, 6161. (University Microfilms No. 2052, 65).Google Scholar
  25. Rieber, R. W. (1989). In search of the impertinent question: An overview of Bateson’s theory of communication. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), The individual, communication, and society: Essays in memory of Gregory Bateson (pp. 25–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ringuette, E., & Kennedy, T. (1966). An experimental study of the double-bind hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 136–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruesch, J. (1961). Therapeutic communication. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Schuham, A. (1967). The double-bind hypothesis a decade later. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 409–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sluzki, C., Beavin, J., Tarnopolsky, A., & Veron, E. (1967). Transactional disqualifications. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 494–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sullivan, H. S. (1944). The language of schizophrenia. In J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and thought in schizophrenia (pp. 4–16). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Watts, A. (1961). Psychotherapy east and west. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
  32. Watzlawick, P. (1963). A review of double-bind theory. Family Process, 2, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watzlawick, P. (1964). An anthology of human communication. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior.Google Scholar
  34. Watzlawick, P. (1965). Paradoxical prediction. Psychiatry, 28, 368–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Weakland, J. (1960). The double-bind hypothesis of schizophrenia and three-party interaction. In D. Jackson (Ed.), The etiology of schizophrenia (pp. 373–388). New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weakland, J., & Fry, W. (1962). Letters of mothers of schizophrenics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 32, 604–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910-1913). Principia mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zuk, G. (1964). A further study of laughter in family therapy. Family Process, 3, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zuk, G., Roszormeny-Nagy, I., & Heiman, E. (1963). Some dynamics of laughter during family therapy. Family Process, 2, 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Rieber
    • 1
  • Harold J. Vetter
    • 2
  1. 1.John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations