A Discussion of Some Aspects of the MCSCF Method
Abstract
After a brief overview of the MCSCF (MultiConfiguration Self-Consistent-Field) method, a more detailed examination of the underlying model is undertaken. The problem of “multiple solutions” is examined with reference to the “symmetry-breaking” problem and with emphasis on single-state cases. It is argued that the most appropriate resolution of such problems is usually case-specific, and depends on the details of how the MCSCF wave function is being used to model the chemical system rather than on features characteristic of the MCSCF wave function itself. Finally, a recently introduced MCSCF wave function optimization method based on multidimensional trigonometric interpolation is briefly discussed.
Keywords
Wave Function Trial Wave Function Orbital Variation Exact Wave Function Wave FunetionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R. Shepard, in: “Ab Initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry II, Advances in Chemical Physics 69”, K. P. Lawley, ed., (Wiley, New York, 1987) pp. 63–200.Google Scholar
- 2.E. Dalgaard and P. Jorgensen, J. Chem. Phys..69, 3833 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.E. Dalgaard, Chem. Phys. Lett.65, 559 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.D. L. Yeager and P. Jørgensen, J. Chem. Phys.71, 755 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. J. Thouless. “The Quantum Mechanics of Many-Body Systems,” (Academic Press, New York, 1961). (see in particular pp. 25–27)Google Scholar
- 6.J. Olsen, D. L. Yeager, and P. Jørgensen, Adv. Chem. Phys.54,1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.R. Shepard, I. Shavitt, and J. Simons, J. Chem. Phys..76,543 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.H. J. Aa. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, and H. Agren, J. Chem. Phys.87,451 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. G. Szalay, A. G. Császár, G. Fogarasi, A. Karpfen, and H. Lischka, J. Chem. Phys.93,1246 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. Shepard, I. Shavitt, R. M. Pitzer, D. C. Comeau, M. Pepper, H. Lischka, P. G. Szalay, R. Ahlrichs, F. B. Brown, and J.-G. Zhao, Int. J. Quantum. Chem.S22,149 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.P. E. M. Siegbahn, Chem. Phys. Lett.119,515 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.H.-J. Werner, in: “Ab Initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry II, Advances in Chemical Physics 69”, K. P. Lawley, ed., (Wiley, New York, 1987) pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
- 13.H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, Theor. Chim. Acta 78,175 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.R. Ahlrichs and P. Scharf, in: “Ab Initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry I, Advances in Chemical Physics 67”, K. P. Lawley, ed., (Wiley, New York, 1987) pp. 501–537.Google Scholar
- 15.A. Banerjee and J. Simons, Int. J. Quantum Chem.19,207 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.W. D. Laidig and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett.104,424 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. R. Hoffmann and J. Simons, J. Chem. Phys.90,3671 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. A. Anderson and R. J. Cave, Chem. Phys.154,1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.B. O. Roos, K. Anderson, and M. P. Falscher, Chem. Phys. Lett.192,5 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.E. R. Davidson and C. F. Bender, Chem. Phys. Lett.59,369 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.R. B. Murphy and R. P. Messmer, J. Chem. Phys.97,4170 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.E. A. Stahlberg, Multireference second- and third-order perturbation theory, in: “Application of Multireference Based Correlation Methods to the Study of Weak Bonding Interactions,” Dissertation, Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (1991).Google Scholar
- 23.K. K. Docken and J. Hinze, J. Chem. Phys. 57,4928 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.K. Ruedenberg, L. M. Cheung, and S. T. Elbert, Int. J. Quantum Chem.16,1069 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.R. Shepard, Theor.Chim. Acta 84,55 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.M. Frisch, I. N. Ragazos, M. A. Robb, and H. B. Schlegel, Chem. Phys. Lett.189,524 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar