Proximity, Contact, and Play Interactions of Zoo-Living Juvenile and Adult Orangutans, with Focus on the Adult Male

  • E. L. Zucker
  • S. C. Thibaut
Chapter

Abstract

The behavioral development of young apes is influenced by their physical and social environments. Deficient or limited environments can result in reproductive insufficiencies (see Beck and Power, 1988) and behavioral deficits, such as Stereotypic movements (see Puleo, et al., 1983; Meder, 1989). The role of the environment in behavioral deficits is evident from studies where stereotypies were reduced or eliminated when the physical or social environments were enhanced (Clarke, et al., 1982; Puleo, et al., 1983; Meder, 1989). The mere presence of conspecifics, however, does not guarantee the development of species-typical behavior, even in complex social groups. For example, a young orangutan reared in a social group containing only adults is limited in its opportunities for social play (Zucker, et al., 1986; see Baldwin, 1986, for more about social and ecological constraints on play). Although adult orangutans of both sexes do play, the rate of adult play is much lower than that of immature orangutans (Zucker, et al., 1986), and in playing with immature orangutans, the style of play of adult females differs from that of adult males (Zucker, et al., 1978). Nursery-reared apes are at risk for behavioral deficits as their social and physical environments usually are less complex than their respective natural environments, although nursery environments and rearing protocols can be made relatively complex and stimulating.

Keywords

Adult Male Adult Female Social Play Female Orangutan Male Orangutan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J., 1974, The observational study of behavior: Sampling techniques. Behaviour 49: 227–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. D., 1986, Behavior in infancy: Exploration and play. In G. Mitchell and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2A: Behavior, Conservation, and Ecology. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, p. 295–326.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J. D., and Baldwin, J. I., 1977, The role of learning phenomena in the ontogeny of exploration and play. In S. Chevalier-Skolnikoff and F. E. Poirier (eds.), Primate Bio-social Development: Biological, Social, and Ecological Determinants. Garland Publishing, New York, p. 343–406.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, B. B., and Power, M. L., 1988, Correlates of sexual and maternal competence in captive gorillas. Zoo Biol. 7: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, A. S., Juno, C. J., and Maple, T. L., 1982, Behavioral effects of a change in the physical environment: A pilot study of captive chimpanzees. Zoo Biol. 1: 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davenport, R. K., Jr., 1967, The orang-utan in Sabah. Folia Primatol. 5: 247–263.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, S. D., and Snowdon, C. T., 1980, Social behavior of captive, group-living orang-utans. Int. J. Primatol. 1:39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin, J., and Deni, R., 1979, Stangers in a strange land: Abnormal behaviors or abnormal environments? In J. Erwin, T. L. Maple, and G. Mitchell (eds.), Captivity and Behavior: Primates in Laboratories, Breeding Colonies, and Zoos. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
  9. Fagen, R., 1974, Selective and evolutionary aspects of animal play. Am. Naturalist 106: 850–858.Google Scholar
  10. Galdikas, B. M. F., 1979, Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: Mating and ecology. In D. Hamburg and E. McCown (eds.), The Great Apes. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, p. 194–233.Google Scholar
  11. Galdikas, B. M. F., 1985a, Subadult male orangutan sociality and reproductive behavior at Tanjung Puting. Am. J. Primatol. 8: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galdikas, B. M. F., 1985b, Orangutan sociality at Tanjung Puting. Am. J. Primatol. 9: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamburger, L., 1988, Introduction of two young orang-utans Pongo pygmaeus into an established family group. Int. Zoo Yrbk. 27: 273–278.Google Scholar
  14. Horr, D. A., 1975, The Borneo orang-utan: Population structure and dynamics in relationship to ecology and reproductive behavior. In L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Primate Behavior: Recent Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol 4. Academic Press, New York, p. 307–323.Google Scholar
  15. Horr, D. A., 1977, Orang-utan maturation: Growing up in a female world. In S. Chevalier-Skolnikoff and F. E. Poirier (eds.), Primate Bio-social Development: Biological, Social, and Ecological Determinants. Garland Publishing, New York, p. 289–321.Google Scholar
  16. Keiter, M. D., 1983, A study of the integration of an adult Sumatran orang-utan female Pongo pygmaeus abelii to an existing adult pair at the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust. Dodo, J. Jersey Wildl. Pres. Trust 20: 53–65.Google Scholar
  17. Keiter, M. D., Reichard, T., and Simmons, J., 1983, Removal, early hand rearing, and successful reintroduction of an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) to her mother. Zoo Biol. 2: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKinnon, J., 1974, The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). Anim. Behav. 22: 3–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maple, T. L., 1980, Orang-utan Behavior. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Maple, T. L., and Zucker, E. L., 1978, Ethological studies of play behavior in captive great apes. In E. O. Smith (ed.), Social Play in Primates. Academic Press, New York, p. 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meder, A., 1985, Integration of hand-reared gorilla infants in a group. Zoo Biol. 4: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meder, A., 1989, Effects of hand-rearing on the behavioral development of infant and juvenile gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla). Dev. Psychobiol. 22: 357–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meder, A., 1990, Integration of hand-reared gorillas into breeding groups. Zoo Biol. 9: 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitani, J. C., 1985, Mating behaviour of male orangutans in the Kutai Game Reserve, Indonesia. Anim. Behav. 33: 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitani, J. C., Grether, G. E., Rodman, P. S., and Priatna, D., 1991, Associations among wild orang-utans: Sociality, passive aggregations, or chance? Anim. Behav. 42: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poole, T. B., 1987, Social behavior of a group of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) on a artificial island in Signapore Zoological Gardens. Zoo Biol. 6: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Puleo, S. G., Zucker, E. L., and Maple, T. L., 1983, Social rehabilitation and foster mothering by captive female orangutans. Zool. Gart. 53: 196–202.Google Scholar
  28. Rijksen, H. D., 1978, A Field Study on Sumatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827). Wageningen, H. Veenman and Zonen B.V.Google Scholar
  29. Rodman, P. S., 1973, Population composition and adaptive organization among orang-utans at the Kutai Reserve. In J. H. Crook and R. P. Michael (eds.), Comparative Ecology and Behaviour of Primates. Academic Press, London, p. 171–209.Google Scholar
  30. Rodman, P. S., and Mitani, J. C., 1987, Orangutans: Sexual dimorphism in a solitary species. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 146–154.Google Scholar
  31. Schurmann, C., 1982, Mating behaviour of wild orangutans. In L. de Boer (ed.), The Orangutan: Its Biology and Conservation. W. Junk, The Hague, p. 269–284.Google Scholar
  32. Schurmann, C., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., 1986, Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and reconsideration of existing sociosexual models. Int. J. Primatol. 8: 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sugardjito, J., te Brockhorst, I. J. A., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., 1987, Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia. Int. J. Primatol. 8: 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tobach, E., Greenberg, G., Radell, P., and McCarthy, T., 1989, Social behavior in a group of orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in a zoo setting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23: 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, C. J., Meilen, J. D., and King, N. E., 1984, Behavior of a group of captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in two different enclosures. AAZPA Reg. Proc.: 186-201.Google Scholar
  36. Zucker, E. L., 1987, Control of intragroup aggression by a captive male orangutan. Zoo Biol. 6: 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zucker, E. L., Dennon, M. B., Puleo, S. G., and Maple, T. L., 1986, Play profiles of captive adult orangutans: A developmental perspective. Dev. Psychobiol. 19: 315–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zucker, E. L., and Ferrera, P. S., 1990, Sociospatial relationships during gestation in captive lowland gorilla and orangutan groups. Zool. Gart. 60: 253–262.Google Scholar
  39. Zucker, E. L., and Kaplan, J. R., 1981, Areinterpretation of’sexual harassment’ inpatas monkeys. Anim. Behav. 29: 957–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zucker, E. L., Mitchell, G., and Maple, T., 1978, Adult male—offspring paly interactions within a captive group of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Primates 19: 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zucker, E. L., Thibaut, S. C., and Watts, E., 1991, Social environments and the behavior of juvenile orangutans. AAZPA Ann. Conf. Proc.: 421-427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. L. Zucker
    • 1
  • S. C. Thibaut
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLoyola UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations