Postcranial Osteology of the North American Middle Eocene Protocetid Georgiacetus

  • Richard C. HulbertJr.
Part of the Advances in Vertebrate Paleobiology book series (AIVP, volume 1)

Abstract

Archaeocete whales are a paraphyletic assemblage of species that represent the evolutionary intermediaries between modern, fully marine cetaceans (Odontoceti and Mysticeti) and their terrestrial ancestors, the Mesonychia (Van Valen, 1966; Fordyce and Barnes, 1994; Thewissen, 1994). For over 80 years the holotype specimen of Protocetus atavus from the middle Eocene of Egypt was the oldest known postcranial skeleton of a cetacean. Necessarily it figured prominently in studies on the early evolution of the postcranial skeleton of cetaceans (e.g., Kellogg, 1936). Several critical specimens collected over the past two decades have greatly improved this record. Notable among these are partial postcranial skeletons of Ambulocetus natans (Thewissen et al., 1994, 1996); Rodhocetus kasrani (Gingerich et al., 1994), Remingtonocetus harudiensis (Gingerich et al., 1993; listed therein as Indocetus ramani but partly reidentified by Gingerich et al., 1995), and Georgiacetus vogtlensis (Hulbert et al., 1998). A fifth specimen, the Habib Rahi whale, remains undescribed (Gingerich, 1991). All of these are more complete than the holotype of P. atavus and include some appendicular elements. The postcrania of Ambulocetus and Remingtonocetus have been thoroughly described and illustrated (Gingerich et al., 1993, 1995; Thewissen et al., 1996). The purpose of this report is to describe the postcranial remains of G. vogtlensis and compare them with those of other archaeocetes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, L. G., and Mitchell, E. 1978. Cetacea, in: V. J. Maglio and H.B.S. Cooke (eds.), Evolution of African Mammals, pp. 582–602. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Buffrénil, V. de, Ricqlés, A. de, Ray, C. E., and Domning, D. P. 1990. Bone histology of the ribs of the archaeocetes (Mammalia: Cetacea). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 10:455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fordyce, R. E., and Barnes, L. G. 1994. The evolutionary history of whales and dolphins. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 22:419–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraas, E. 1904. Neue Zeuglodonten aus dem unteren Mitteleocän vom Mokattam bei Cairo. Geol. Palaeontol. Abh. N.F. 6:199–220.Google Scholar
  5. Geisler, J., Sanders, A. E., and Luo, Z. 1996. A new protocetid cetacean from the Eocene of South Carolina, U.S.A.; phylogenetic and biogeographic implications in: J. E. Repetski (ed.), Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. Paleontol. Soc. Spec. Pap. 8:139.Google Scholar
  6. Gingerich, P. D. 1991. Partial skeleton of a new archaeocete from the earliest middle Eocene Habib Rahi Limestone, Pakistan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 11:31A.Google Scholar
  7. Gingerich, P. D., and Uhen, M. D. 1996. Ancalecetus simonsi, a new dorudontine archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the early late Eocene of Wadi Hitan, Egypt. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Michigan 29(13):359–401.Google Scholar
  8. Gingerich, P. D., Smith, B. H., and Simons, E. L. 1990. Hind limbs of Eocene Basilosaurus: evidence of feet in whales. Science 249:154–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gingerich, P. D., Raza, S. M., Arif, M., Anwar, M., and Zhou, X. 1993. Partial skeletons of Indocetus ramani (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the lower middle Eocene Domanda Shale in the Sulaiman Range of Punjab (Pakistan). Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Michigan 28(16):393–416.Google Scholar
  10. Gingerich, P. D., Raza, S. M., Arif, M., Anwar, M., and Zhou, X. 1994. New whale from the Eocene of Pakistan and the origin of cetacean swimming. Nature 368:844–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gingerich, P. D., Arif, M., and Clyde, W. C. 1995. New archaeocetes (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the middle Eocene Domanda Formation of the Sulaiman Range, Punjab (Pakistan). Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Michigan 29(11):291–330.Google Scholar
  12. Halstead, L. B., and Middleton, J. A. 1974. New material of the archaeocete whale, Pappocetus lugardi Andrews, from the middle Eocene of Nigeria. J. Min. Geol. 8:81–85.Google Scholar
  13. Hulbert, R. C. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Eocene whales (“Archaeoceti”) with a diagnosis of a new North American protocetid genus. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 14:30A.Google Scholar
  14. Hulbert, R. C. 1996. Dental and basicranial anatomy of a late middle Eocene protocetid cetacean from the southeastern United States. Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. Paleontol. Soc. Spec. Pap. 8:186.Google Scholar
  15. Hulbert, R. C., Petkewich, R. M., Bishop, G. A., Bukry, D., and Aleshire, D. P. 1998. A new middle Eocene protocetid whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and associated biota from Georgia. J. Paleontol. 72:905–925.Google Scholar
  16. Kellogg, R. 1936. A review of the Archaeoceti. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. 482:1–366.Google Scholar
  17. Lucas, F. A. 1900. The pelvic girdle of zeuglodon Basilosaurus cetoides (Owen), with notes on other portions of the skeleton. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 23:327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLeod, S. A., and Barnes, L. G. 1996. The systematic position of Pappocetus lugardi and a new taxon from North America (Archaeoceti: Protocetidae). Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. Paleontol. Soc. Spec. Pap. 8:270.Google Scholar
  19. O’Leary, M. A., and Rose, K. D. 1995. Postcranial skeleton of the early Eocene mesonychid Pachyaena (Mammalia: Mesonychia). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 15:401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarasoff, F. J., Bisaillon, A., Pierard, J., and Whit, A. P. 1972. Locomotory patterns and external morphology of the river otter, sea otter, and harp seal (Mammalia). Can. J. Zool. 50:915–929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thewissen, J.G.M. 1994. Phylogenetic aspects of cetacean origins: a morphological perspective. J. Mamm. Evol. 2:157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thewissen, J.G.M. 1995. Cetacean diversity in fluvial Eocene sediments of Punjab, Pakistan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 15:56A.Google Scholar
  23. Thewissen, J.G.M., Hussain, S. T., and Arif, M. 1994. Fossil evidence for the origin of aquatic locomotion in archaeocete whales. Science 263:210–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thewissen, J.G.M., Madar, S. I., and Hussain, S. T. 1996. Ambulocetus natans, an Eocene cetacean (Mammalia) from Pakistan. Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 191:1–86.Google Scholar
  25. Uhen, M. D. 1996a. Composition and characteristics of the subfamily Dorudontinae (Archaeoceti, Cetacea). Sixth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts of Papers. Paleontol. Soc. Spec. Pap. 8:403.Google Scholar
  26. Uhen, M. D. 1996b. New protocetid archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the late middle Eocene Cook Mountain Formation of Louisiana. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 16:70A.Google Scholar
  27. Uhen, M. D. In press. New species of protocetid archaeocyte(Mammalia, Cetacea) from the middle Eocene of North Carolina. J. Paleontol. Google Scholar
  28. Van Valen, L. 1966. Deltatheridia, a new order of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 132:1–126.Google Scholar
  29. Wortman, J. L. 1901-1902. Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh Collection. Part I. Carnivore, suborder Creodontia Cope. Am. J. Sci. 12:281–296, 377-382, 421-432, 13:39-46.Google Scholar
  30. Zhou, X., Sanders. W. J., and Gingerich, P. D. 1992. Funtional and behavioral implications of vertebral structure in Pachyaena ossifraga (Mammalia, Mesonychia). Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Michigan 28:289–319.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. HulbertJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeographyGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations