Abstract
Many problems in applied mathematics lead to ordinary differential equations. In the simplest case one seeks a differentiable function y = y(x) of one real variable x, whose derivative y’(x) is to satisfy an equation of the form y’(x) = f(x, y(x)), or more briefly, one then speaks of an ordinary differential equation.
$$y' = f\left( {x,y} \right); $$
(7.0.1)
Keywords
Ordinary Differential Equation Discretization Error Multistep Method Linear Multistep Method Implicit Euler Method
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References for Chapter 7
- Babuška, I., Prager, M., Vitasék, E.: Numerical Processes in Differential Equations. New York: Interscience (1966).MATHGoogle Scholar
- Bulirsch, R.: Die Mehrzielmethode zur numerischen Lösung von nichtlinearen Randwertproblemen und Aufgaben der optimalen Steuerung. Report of the Carl-Cranz-Gesellschaft. 1971.Google Scholar
- Bulirsch, R., Stoer, J.: Numerical treatment of ordinary differential equations by extrapolation methods. Numer. Math. 8, 1–13 (1966).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bulirsch, R., Stoer, J., Deuflhard, P.: Numerical solution of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems 1. Handbook Series Approximation, Numer. Math. (to appear).Google Scholar
- Butcher, J. C.: On Runge-Kutta processes of high order. J. Austral Math. Soc. 4, 179–194 (1964).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ciarlet, P. G., Schultz, M. H., Varga, R. S.: Numerical methods of high order accuracy for nonlinear boundary value problems. Numer. Math. 9, 394–430 (1967).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ciarlet, P. G., Schultz, M. H., Varga, R. S., Wagschal, C.: Multipoint Taylor formulas and applications to the finite element method. Numer. Math. 17, 84–100 (1971).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, N. W.: A study of some numerical methods for the integration of systems of first order ordinary differential equations. Report ANL-7428, Argonne National Laboratory 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coddington, E. A., Levinson, N.: Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: McGraw-Hill (1955).MATHGoogle Scholar
- Collatz, L.: The Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1960).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collatz, L.: Functional Analysis and Numerical Mathematics. New York: Academic Press (1966).Google Scholar
- Collatz, L., Nicolovius, R.: Rand und Eigenwertprobleme bei gewöhnlichen und partiellen Differentialgleichungen und Integralgleichungen. In Sauer and Szabó (1969), 293–670.Google Scholar
- Crane, P. J., Fox, P. A.: A comparative study of computer programs for integrating differential equations. Numer. Math. Computer Program Library One—Basic Routines for General Use (Bell Telephone Laboratories Inc., New Jersey) 2, No. 2 (1969).Google Scholar
- Dahlquist, G.: Convergence and stability in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Math. Scand. 4, 33–53 (1956).MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Dahlquist, G.: Stability and error bounds in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Trans. Roy. Inst. Tech. (Stockholm), No. 130 (1959).MATHGoogle Scholar
- Deuflhard, P.: A stepsize control for continuation methods with special application to multiple shooting techniques. Report TUM-Math.-7627, Technical University of Munich 1976.Google Scholar
- Diekhoff, H.-J., Lory, P., Oberle, H. J., Pesch, H.-J., Rentrop, P., Seydel, R.: Comparing routines for the numerical solution of initial value problems of ordinary differential equations in multiple shooting. Numer. Math. 27, 449–469 (1977).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Enright, W. H., Hull, T. E., Lindberg, B.: Comparing numerical methods for stiff systems of ODEs. Tech. Rep. No. 69, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Sept. 1974.Google Scholar
- Fehlberg, E.: New high-order Runge-Kutta formulas with stepsize control for systems of first- and second-order differential equations. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 44, T17–T29 (1964).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fehlberg, E.: New high-order Runge-Kutta formulas with an arbitrarily small truncation error. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 46, 1–16 (1966).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fehlberg, E.: Klassische Runge-Kutta Formeln fünfter und siebenter Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle. Computing 4, 93–106 (1969).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fehlberg, E.: Klassische Runge-Kutta Formeln vierter und niedrigerer Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle und ihre Anwendung auf Wärmeleitungsprobleme. Computing 6, 61–71 (1970).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fröberg, C. E.: Introduction into Numerical Analysis. London: Addison-Wesley (1966).Google Scholar
- Gantmacher, F. R.: Matrizenrechnung II. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften (1969).Google Scholar
- Gear, C. W.: Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1971.MATHGoogle Scholar
- George, J. A.: Computer implementation of the finite element method. Report CS 208, Computer Science Department, Stanford University 1971.Google Scholar
- George, J. A.: Nested dissection of a regular finite element mesh. SIAM J. Numer. Anal 10, 345–363 (1973).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gragg, W.: Repeated extrapolation to the limit in the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Thesis, UCLA 1963.Google Scholar
- Gragg, W.: On extrapolation algorithms for ordinary initial value problems. J. SIAM Numer. Anal. Ser. B 2, 384–403 (1965).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Grigorieff, R. D.: Numerik gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen 1, 2. Stuttgart: Teubner 1972, 1977.Google Scholar
- Henrici, P.: Discrete Variable Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: John Wiley 1962.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Hestenes, M. R.: Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory. New York: John Wiley 1966.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Heun, K.: Neue Methode zur approximativen Integration der Differentialgleichungen einer unabhängigen Variablen. Z. Math. Phys. 45, 23–38 (1900).MATHGoogle Scholar
- Hindmarsh, A. C.: GEAR-Ordinary differential equation solver. UCID-30001, Rev. 3, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, 1974.Google Scholar
- Hull, T. E., Enright, W. H., Fellen, B. M., Sedgwick, A. E.: Comparing numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 9, 603–637 (1972). [Errata, ibid. 11, 681 (1974).]MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Isaacson, E., Keller, H. B.: Analysis of Numerical Methods. New York: John Wiley 1966.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Kaps, P., Rentrop, P.: Generalized Runge-Kutta methods of order four with step size control for stiff ordinary differential equations. Numer. Math. 33, 55–68, 1979.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keller, H. B.: Numerical Methods for Two-Point Boundary-Value Problems. London: Blaisdell 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Krogh, F. T.: Changing step size in the integration of differential equations using modified divided differences. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations, 22–71. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 362. New York: Springer-Verlag 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kutta, W.: Beitrag zur näherungsweisen Integration totaler Differentialgleichungen. Z. Math. Phys. 46, 435–453 (1901).MATHGoogle Scholar
- Na, T. Y., Tang, S. C.: A method for the solution of conduction heat transfer with non-linear heat generation. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 49, 45–52 (1969).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oden, J. T., Reddy, J. N.: An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Finite Elements. New York: Wiley 1976.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Osborne, M. R.: On shooting methods for boundary value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 27, 417–433 (1969).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Runge, C.: Über die numerische Auflösung von Differentialgleichungen. Math. Ann. 46, 167–178 (1895).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sauer, R., Szabó, I., Eds.: Mathematische Hilfsmittel des Ingenieurs, Part II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1969.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Sedgwick, A.: An effective variable order variable step Adams method. Technical Report No. 53, University of Toronto, Department of Computer Science 1973.Google Scholar
- Shampine, L. F., Gordon, M. K.: Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations. The Initial Value Problem. San Francisco: Freeman 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Shampine, L. F., Gordon, M. K., Watts, H. A., Davenport, S. M.: Solving nonstiff ordinary differential equations—the state of the art. SIAM Review 18, 376–411 (1976).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shanks, E. B.: Solution of differential equations by evaluation of functions. Math. Comp. 20, 21–38 (1966).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stetter, H. J.: Analysis of Discretization Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1973.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strang, G., Fix, G. J.: An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1973.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Törnig, W.: Anfangswertprobleme bei gewöhnlichen und partiellen Differentialgleichungen. In: Sauer and Szabó (1969), 1–290 (1969).Google Scholar
- Troesch, B. A.: Intrinsic difficulties in the numerical solution of a boundary value problem. Internal Report NN-142, TRW, Inc. Redondo Beach, California, January 29, 1960.Google Scholar
- Troesch, B. A.: A simple approach to a sensitive two-point boundary value problem. J. Computational Phys. 21, 279–290 (1976).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Willoughby, R. A., Ed.: Stiff Differential Systems. New York and London: Plenum Press 1974.Google Scholar
- Zlámal, M.: On the finite element method. Numer. Math. 12, 394–409 (1968).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zlámal, M.: On some finite element procedures for solving second order boundary value problems. Numer. Math. 14, 42–48 (1969).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980