Intensive Care Medicine pp 55-64 | Cite as
Microarray Technology in Sepsis: Tool or Toy?
Conference paper
Abstract
Sepsis is a result of highly heterogeneous processes characterized by an involvement of multiple components and their interactions at each organizational level of the human body: genes, cells, tissues, organs. The complexity of the underlying biological and immunological processes has encouraged multiple types of research studies comprising a broad panel of clinical aspects. One of the lessons learned to date is that evaluation of new sepsis therapies has been hampered by fairly unspecific, clinically-based inclusion criteria which insufficiently reflect the molecular mechanisms [1].
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Vincent JL, Angus D, Annane D, et al (2001) Clinical expert round table discussion (session 5) at the Margaux Conference on Critical Illness: outcomes of clinical trials in sepsis: lessons learned. Crit Care Med 29: S136–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Southern EM (1974) An improved method for transferring nucleotides from electrophoresis strips to thin layers of ion-exchange cellulose. Anal Biochem 62: 317–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gillespie D, Spiegelman S (1965) A quantitative assay for DNA-RNA hybrids with DNA immobilized on a membrane. J Mol Biol 12: 829–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Lennon GG, Lehrach H (1991) Hybridization analyses of arrayed cDNA libraries. Trends Genet 7: 314–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kafatos FC, Jones CW, Efstratiadis A (1979) Determination of nucleic acid sequence homologies and relative concentrations by a dot hybridization procedure. Nucl Acid Res 7: 15411552Google Scholar
- 6.Fodor SP, Read JL, Pirrung MC, Stryer L, Lu AT, Solas D (1991) Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science 251: 767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pease AC, Solas D, Sullivan EJ, Cronin MT, Holmes CP, Fodor SP (1994) Light-generated oligonucleotide arrays for rapid DNA sequence analysis. Proc Nail Acad Sci USA 91: 50225026Google Scholar
- 8.Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270: 467–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Edman CF, Raymond DE, Wu DJ, et al (1997) Electric field directed nucleic acid hybridization on microchips. Nucleic Acid Res 25: 4907–4914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gray DE, Case-Green SC, Fell TS, Dobson PJ, Southern EM (1997) Ellipsometric and interferometric characterization of DNA probes immobilised on a combinatorial array. Langmuir 13: 2833–2842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ferguson JA, Boles TC, Adams CP, Walt DR (1996) A fiber-optic DNA biosensor microarray for the analysis of gene expression. Nat Biotechnol 14: 1681–1684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Michael KL, Taylor LC, Schultz SL, Walt DR (1998) Randomly ordered addressable high-density optical sensor arrays. Anal Chem 70: 1242–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Walt DR (2000) Bead-based fiber-optic arrays. Science 287: 451–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lockhart DJ, Winzeler EA (2000) Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 405: 827–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wu W, Wildsmith SE, Winkley AJ, Yallop R, Elcock FJ, Bugelski PJ (2001) Chemometric strategies for normalization of gene expression data obtained from cDNA microarrays. Analytica Chimica Acta 446: 451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, et al (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286: 531–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al (2000) Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403: 503–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, et al (2002) The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature 419: 624–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bakay M, Chen Y-W, Borup R, Zhao P, Nagaraju K, Hoffman EP (2002) Sources of variability and effect of experimental approach on expression profiling data interpretation. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Joyce DE, Gelbert L, Ciaccia A, DeHoff B, Grinnell BW (2001) Gene expression profile of antithrombotic protein c defines new mechanisms modulating inflammation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem 276: 11199–11203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fillion I, Ouellet N, Simard M, Bergeron Y, Sato S, Bergeron MG (2001) Role of chemokines and formyl peptides in pneumococcal pneumonia-induced monocyte/macrophage recruitment. J Immunol 166: 7353–7361PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Zhao B, Bowden RA, Stavchansky SA, Bowman PD (2001) Human endothelial cell response to gram-negative lipopolysaccharide assessed with cDNA microarrays. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 281: C1587 - C1595PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Chinnaiyan AM, Huber-Lang M, Kumar-Sinha C, et al (2001) Molecular signatures of sepsis. Multiorgan gene expression profiles of systemic inflammation. Am J Pal:hol 15: 11991209Google Scholar
- 24.Drmanac S, Kita D, Labat I, et al (1998) Accurate sequencing by hybridization for DNA diagnostics and individual genomics. Nat Biotechnol 16: 54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Cargill M, Altshuler D, Ireland J, et al (1999) Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat Genet 22: 231–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1.Vincent JL, Angus D, Annane D, et al (2001) Clinical expert round table discussion (session 5) at the Margaux Conference on Critical Illness: outcomes of clinical trials in sepsis: lessons learned. Crit Care Med 29: S136 - 137 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003