The Effects of Setting Deposit Insurance Premiums to Target Insurance Fund Reserves

  • George G. Pennacchi

Abstract

A common feature of many insurance systems is that they are “backed” by an insurance fund and insurance premiums are adjusted to target this fund’s reserves. This study analyzes the fund targeting policy of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). It examines the distortions to banks’ cost of deposit financing that result from setting premiums in this manner The study’s framework is a multiperiod, multibank contingent claims model where the stochastic rates of return on individual banks’ assets are assumed to be correlated and match the actual empirical distribution of a sample of U.S. banks. The model identifies factors that are likely to exacerbate distortions due to insurance mispricing. The relative merits of a targeting policy and a flat-rate insurance policy are discussed, and the real effects of insurance mispricing are estimated. A method for valuing a government subsidy under a reserve targeting policy is also presented.

Key words

deposit insurance FDIC 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.M. Best Company. Best’s Insolvency Study: Property Casualty Insurers 1969–1990. Oldwick, NJ: June 1991. Black, E, and M. Scholes. Best Company. Best’s Insolvency Study: Property Casualty Insurers 1969–1990. Oldwick, NJ: June 1991. Black, E, and M. Scholes. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973), 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle, P. “Options Pricing: A Monte Carlo Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics 4 (1977), 323–338. Chan, Y.-S., S. Greenbaum, and A. Thakor. “Is Fairly Priced Deposit Insurance Possible?” Journal of Finance 47 (1992), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooperstein, R., G. Pennacchi, and ES. Redbum. “The Aggregate Cost of Deposit Insurance: A Multiperiod Analysis.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 4 (1995), 242–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, J., and S. Ross. “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The First Fifty Years. Washington, DC: FDIC, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Feldman, R. “When Should the FDIC Act Like a Private Insurance Company? When It Comes to Pricing, Not Reserves.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, The Region 12, no. 3 (1998), 43–50.Google Scholar
  7. Furlong, E “Capital Regulation and Bank Lending.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Economic Review 3 (1992), 23–33.Google Scholar
  8. James, C. “The Losses Realized in Bank Failures.” Journal of Finance 46 (1991), 1223–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marcus, A. “Deregulation and Bank Financial Policy.” Journal of Banking and Finance 8 (1984), 557–565. Marcus, A., and I. Shaked. “The Valuation of FDIC Deposit Insurance Using Option-Pricing Estimates.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 16 (1984), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mehra, R., and E. Prescott. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics 15 (1985), 145–161. Merton, R.C. “The Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4 (1973), 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merton, R.C. “An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees: An Application of Modern Option Pricing Theory.” Journal of Banking and Finance 1 (1977), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pennacchi, G. “Alternative Forms of Deposit Insurance: Pricing and Bank Incentive Issues.” Journal of Banking and Finance 11 (1987a), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pennacchi, G. “A Reexamination of the Over- (or Under-) Pricing of Deposit Insurance.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 19 (1987b), 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rubinstein, M. “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics 7 (1976), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sheehan, K. “Capitalization of the Bank Insurance Fund.” Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Working Paper 98–1, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Taur, R. “Re-estimation of Furlong’s Capital Adjustment Process.” Memo, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, July 1997.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. General Accounting Office. Deposit Insurance: Overview of Six Foreign Systems. GAO NSIAD-91–104, February 1991.Google Scholar
  18. U.S. General Accounting Office. Financial Audit: Resolution Trust Corporation’s 1995 and 1994 Financial Statements. GAO AIMD-96–123, July 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • George G. Pennacchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of FinanceUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations