Classifying hedge funds with Kohonen maps: A first attempt

  • Bertrand Maillet
  • Patrick Rousset
Part of the Advances in Computational Management Science book series (AICM, volume 6)


The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical study of a set of hedge funds on recent periods. Alternative investments are now widely used by institutional investors and numerous studies highlight the main features of such investments. As they are in general poorly correlated with the main world indexes, traditional asset pricing models yield poor adjustments, partially because of potential non-linearities in pay-off functions. Some funds, however, exhibit high reward to variability ratios and can advantageously be incorporated in a portfolio in a diversification perspective. After describing the dataset, we classify the funds employing the Kohonen algorithm. We then cross the classification with the one based on the style of strategies involved, wondering if such categories are enough homogeneous to be relevant. The map of funds allows to characterize families of funds — whose conditional densities are different one to another — and to define a representative fund for each class. The structure of the network of funds is then described. In particular, we measure inter-class similarities and visualize them both on the network of funds and via a map of one-to-one distances between representative funds. Finally, we underline some of characteristics of classified fund families that may interest investors such as performance measurements.

Key words

Kohonen maps Classification Multidimensional Data Analysis General Non-linear Models Hedge Funds Fund-picking Performance Measurements 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agarwal V., Naik N. (2000-a), “Multi-period Persistence Analysis of Hedge Funds”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 327–342.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal V., Naik N. (2000-b), “Characterizing Systematic Risk of Hedge Funds with Buy-and-hold and Option-based Strategies”, LBS working paper,IFA n°300, August, 51 pages.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson T. (1984), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley Editor, 2nd Edition, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Blake E., Elton M., Gruber C. (1999), “Common Factors in Active and Passive Portfolios”, European Finance Review, 3(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blayo F., Demartines P. (1991), “Data Analysis: How to Compare Kohonen Neural Networks to Other Techniques?”, in Proceedings of IWANN’91 Conference, Springer, 469–476.Google Scholar
  6. Bonanno G., Vandewalle N., Mantegna R. (2000), “Taxonomy of Stock Market Indices”, Physical Review E 62(6), December.Google Scholar
  7. Bowden R. “The Ordered Mean Difference as a Portfolio Performance Measure”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 195–223.Google Scholar
  8. Brown S., Goetzmann W. (1997), “Mutual Fund Styles”, Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 373–399.Google Scholar
  9. Brown S., Goetzmann W. (2001), “Hedge Funds with Styles”, NBER Working Paper n° w8173, March, 37 pages.Google Scholar
  10. Chauveau T., Maillet B. (2001), “Performance with Restricted Borrowing: A Generalisation of Usual Measures”, in Proceedings of EFMA’01 Conference, Lugano, June, 46 pages.Google Scholar
  11. Connor G., Korajczyk R. (1986), “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (3), 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cottrell M., Fort J.C., Pagès G. (1995) “Two or Three Things that We Know about the Kohonen Algorithm”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN ‘84 Conference, D Facto, Bruxelles, 235–244.Google Scholar
  13. Cottrell M., de Bodt E. (1996), “A Kohonen Map Representations to Avoid Misleading Interpretations”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN’96 Conference, D Facto, Bruxelles, 103–110.Google Scholar
  14. Cottrell M., de Bodt E. (2000), “Bootstrapping Self-organizing Maps to Assess the Statistical Significance of Local Proximity”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN’00 Conference, D Facto, Bruges, 245–254.Google Scholar
  15. Cottrell M., Girard B., Girard Y., Muller C., Rousset P. (1995-a), “Daily Electrical Power Curves: Classification and Forecasting Using a Kohonen Map, From Natural to Artificial Neural Computation”, Proceedings of IWANN’95 Conference,Springer, 1107–1113.Google Scholar
  16. Cottrell M., Girard B., Girard Y., M. Mangeas (1995-b), `Neural Modelling for Time Series: A Statistical Stepwise Method for Weight Elimination“, IEEE Tr. on Neural Networks,6(6), November, 1355–1364.Google Scholar
  17. Cottrell M., Fort J.-C., Pagès G. (1998-a), “Theoretical Aspects of the SOM Algorithm”, Neuro Computing, 21, 119–138.Google Scholar
  18. Cottrell M., Girard B., Rousset P. (1998-b), “Forecasting of Curves Using a Kohonen Classification”, Journal of Forecasting,17(5/6), 429–439.Google Scholar
  19. Dacorogna M., Gençay R., Müller U., Pictet O. (2001), “Effective Return, Risk Aversion and Drawdowns”, Physica, A 289, 229–248.Google Scholar
  20. Daniel K., Grinblatt M., Titman S., Wermers R. (1997), “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristics-based Benchmarks”, Journal of Finance, 52(3), July, 1035–1058.Google Scholar
  21. de Bodt E., Grégoire Ph., Cottrell M. (1997), “Projection of Long-term Interest Rates with Maps”, in Deboeck G., Kohonen T. (eds), Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps, Springer, 24–38.Google Scholar
  22. Deboeck G. (1997), “Picking Mutual Funds with Self-organizing Maps”, in Deboeck G., Kohonen T. (eds) Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps, Springer, 39–58.Google Scholar
  23. DeRoon F., Nijman T., Terhost J. (2001), “Evaluating Style Analysis”, in Proceedings ofEFMA’01 Conference, Lugano, June, 33 pages.Google Scholar
  24. Dibartomoleo D., Witkowski E. (1997), “Mutual Fund Misclassification: Evidence based on Style Analysis”, Financial Analysts Journal, Sept-Oct, 32–43.Google Scholar
  25. Fung W., Hsieh D. (1997), “Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds”, Review of Financial Studies, 10(2), Summer, 275–302.Google Scholar
  26. Fung W., Hsieh D. (1998), “Performance Attribution and Style Analysis. From Mutual Funds to Hedge Funds”, Working paper, Paradigm Financial Product, February, 41 pages.Google Scholar
  27. Fung W., Hsieh D. (1999), “A Primer on Hedge Funds”, Journal of Empirical Finance,6(3), 309331.Google Scholar
  28. Fung W., Hsieh D. (2000), “Performance Characteristics of Hedge Funds and Commodity Funds: Natural versus Spurious Biases”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 291–307.Google Scholar
  29. Fung W., Hsieh D. (2001), “The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Trend Followers”, Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), Summer, 313–341.Google Scholar
  30. Grinblatt M., Titman S. (1989), “Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and New Insights”, Review of Financial Studies, 2 (3), 393–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruber M. (2001), “Identying the Risk Structure of Mutual Fund Returns”, European Financial Management, 7 (2), June 2001, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen M. (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964”, Journal of Finance, 23, May, 389–416.Google Scholar
  33. Jobson J., Korkie B. (1981), “Performance Hypothesis and Testing and with the Sharpe and Treynor Measures”, Journal of Finance, 36, September, 889–908.Google Scholar
  34. Kohonen T. (2001), Self-organizing Maps, Springer Series in Information Sciences, XXX, 3rd extended edition, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  35. Leland H. (1999), “Beyond Mean-variance: Performance Measurement in a Nonsymmetric World”, Financial Analysts Journal, January-February, 27–36.Google Scholar
  36. Lhabitant F.-S. (2001), “Assessing Market Risk for Hedge Funds and Hedge Funds Portfolios”, FAME Research Paper n°24, March, 40 pages.Google Scholar
  37. Mantegna R. (1999), “Information and Hierachical Structure in Financial Markets”, Computer Physics Comunications, 121–122, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitev T. (1998), “Classification of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) using Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis”, Journal of Alternative Investments, 1(2), Fall, 40–46.Google Scholar
  39. Miller R., Gehr A. (1978), “Sample Bias and Sharpe’s Performance Measure: A Note” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13, December, 943–946Google Scholar
  40. Okunev J. (1990), “An Alternative Measure of Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,17(2), Spring, 247–264.Google Scholar
  41. Pedersen Ch., Satchel’ S. (2000), “Small Sample Analysis of Performance Measures in the Asymmetric Response Model”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 425–450.Google Scholar
  42. Sharpe W. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business, 34(1), Part 1, January, 119138.Google Scholar
  43. Sharpe W. (1988), “Determining a Fund’s Effective Asset Mix”, Investment Management Review, 2 (6), 1988, 59–69.Google Scholar
  44. Sharpe W. (1992), “Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement” Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(2), 7–19Google Scholar
  45. Sharpe W. (1994), “The Sharpe Ratio”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall, 49–58.Google Scholar
  46. Sortino F., Price L. (1994), “Performance Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework” Journal of Investing, Fall, 59–65Google Scholar
  47. Treynor J. (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 63–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TEAM/CNRS, ESCP-EAP and A.A.Advisors (ABN Amro Group)University Paris-1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne)France
  2. 2.CEREQ and SAMOSUniversity Paris-1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne)France

Personalised recommendations