Economic and Financial Modeling with Mathematica® pp 344-367 | Cite as

# Bayesian Econometrics: Conjugate Analysis and Rejection Sampling

## Abstract

In real-world problems we are invariably faced with making decisions in an environment of uncertainty (see also the chapter by R. Korsan in this volume). A statistical paradigm then becomes essential for extracting information from observed data and using this to improve our knowledge about the world (inference), and thus guiding us in the decision problem at hand. The underlying probability interpretation for a Bayesian is a subjective one, referring to a personal degree of belief. The rules of probability calculus are used to examine how prior beliefs are transformed to posterior beliefs by incorporating data information. The sampling model is a “window” [see Poirier (1988)] through which the researcher views the world. Here we only consider cases where such a model is parameterized by a parameter vector *θ* of finite dimension. A Bayesian then focuses on the inference on *θ* (treated as a random variable) given the observed data *Y* (fixed), summarized in the posterior density *p*(*θ*|*Y*). The observations in *Y* define a mapping from the prior *p*(*θ*) into *p*(*θ*|*Y*). This posterior distribution can also be used to integrate out the parameters when we are interested in forecasting future values, say, *Ỹ*, leading to the post-sample predictive density *p*(*Ỹ*|*Y*) = *∫* *p*(*Ỹ*|*Y*, *θ*)*p*(*θ*|*Y*)*d* *θ* where *p*(*Ỹ*|*Y*, *θ*) is obtained from the sampling model.

## Keywords

Posterior Distribution Posterior Density High Posterior Density Prior Density High Posterior Density## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Drèze J. H. (1962). “The Bayesian Approach to Simultaneous Equation Estimation,” O.N.R. Research Memorandum no. 67, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Engle, R. F., D. F. Hendry and J. F. Richard (1983). “Exogeneity,”
*Econometrica*,**51**, 277–304.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Florens, J.-P. and M. Mouchart (1985). “Conditioning in Dynamic Models,”
*Journal of Time Series Analysis*,**6**, 15–34.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Good, I. J. (1976). “The Bayesian Influence, or How to Sweep Subjectivism Under the Carpet,” in
*Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science*, vol. II, W. Harper and C. Hooker (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 125–174.Google Scholar - Jeffreys, H. (1961).
*Theory of Probability*, Oxford: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Judge, G. C., W. E. Griffiths, R. Carter-Hill, H. Lütkepohl, T.-C. Lee (1985).
*The Theory and Practice of Econometrics*, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Johnson, M. E. (1987).
*Multivariate Statistical Simulation*, New York: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Leamer, E. E. (1978).
*Specification Searches*, New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Ley, E. (1992). “Applied Demand Analysis in Utility Space,” mimeo.Google Scholar
- Newhouse, J. P. (1977). “Medical Care Expenditure: A Cross-National Survey,”
*Journal of Human Resources*,**12**, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Osiewalski J. and M. F. J. Steel (1990). “A Bayesian Analysis of Exogeneity in Models Pooling Time-Series and Cross-Section Data,” mimeo.Google Scholar
- Poirier, D. J. (1988). “Frequentist and Subjectivist Perspectives on the Problems of Model Building in Economics,”
*Economic Perspectives*,**2**, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raiffa, H. A. and R. S. Schlaifer (1961).
*Applied Statistical Decision Theory*, Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Ripley, B. (1986).
*Stochastic Simulation*, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar - Smith, A. F. M. and A. E. Gelfand (1992). “Bayesian Statistics Without Tears: A Sampling Resampling Perspective,”
*American Statistician*,**46**, 84–88.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - van den Broeck, J., G. Koop, J. Osiewalski and M. F. J. Steel (1992). “Stochastic Frontier Models: A Bayesian Perspective,” Division de Economía WP 92–12, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
- Varian, H. R. (1990). “Goodness-of-Fit in Optimizing Models,”
*Journal of Econometrics*,**46**, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zellner, A. (1971).
*An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics*, New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar