A Breakdown in Simultaneous Information Processing
The ability to detect accurately, recognize, and extract useful information from two superimposed sources of visual information at the same time is of both theoretical and practical interest. The scientific literature in such areas as the psychology of attentional processes, cognitive processing, sensory channel capacity, and other fields contains numerous such studies. Among them are the early auditory perception research of Broadbent (1952, 1958) in which he proposed a single-channel filter theory of information processing, Treisman’s (1960) modified sequential processing model involving a two-stage filter, and Deutsch and Deutsch’s (1963) preattentive parallel processing model. Most past visual research employed simple stimuli (point light sources, simple geometric shapes, etc.). Nevertheless, the effectiveness of information transfer using more complex, real-life stimulus fields demanded further study from the standpoint of helping to design modern instrumentation for commercial turbojet airplane flight.
KeywordsPoint Light Source Flight Crew Simple Geometric Shape Flight Training Human Factor Society
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bray, R. S., 1980, A HUD Format for Application to Transport Aircraft Approach and Landing, NASA Technical Memorandum 81199, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Fisher, E., Haines, R. F., and Price, T. A., 1980, Cognitive Issues in Head-up Displays, NASA Technical Paper 1711, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Haines, R. F., Fisher, E., and Price, T. A., 1980, Head-up transition behavior of pilots with and without head-up display in simulated low-visibility approaches, NASA Technical Paper 1720, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- NASA, 1978, Aviation Safety Reporting System: Eighth Quarterly Report, NASA Technical Memorandum 78540, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Weintraub, D. M., Haines, R. F., and Randle, R. J., 1985, Head-up display (HUD): II: Runway to HUD transitions monitoring eye focus and decision times, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting, (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society of America), pp. 615–619.Google Scholar