The Evolution of the Tongue of Snakes, and its Bearing on Snake Origins

  • S. B. Mcdowell

Abstract

The form and texture of the tongue has long been one of the major bases for the classification of lizards, as evidenced by such herpetological catalogues as de Rooij (1915) that base the “synopsis of families” principally on the tongue, and by the “-gjossa” names for higher groups of lizards in the older literature (e.g., Pachyglossa, Leptoglossa, Thecaglossa, Diploglossa, all used by Cope, 1900, but taken by him from earlier authors). I can find no case where a lizard was referred to a particular group on the basis of tongue structure but subsequently found, from other evidence, to be unrelated. On the other hand, in two cases families of lizards have been referred to higher groups against the evidence of the tongue, and subsequent study of the osteology has shown such reference to be in error: the Pygopodidae were referred by Camp (1923) to the same group as that containing Anguidae, Xenosauridae, Anniellidae, Helodermatidae, and Varani-dae, in spite of a very different tongue; but McDowell and Bogert (1954) and Underwood (1957) showed that the Pygopodidae are most closely related to the Gekkonidae, with which they agree in tongue structure as well as many other features.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albright, R. G., and E. M. Nelson. 1959. Cranial kinetics of the generalized colubrid snake Elaphe obsoleta quadrivittata. J. Morph., 105:193–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahl, K. N. 1937. Skull of Varanus monitor (Linn.). Rec. Indian Mus., 39:133–174.Google Scholar
  3. Barrows, S., and H. M. Smith. 1947. The skeleton of the lizard Xenosaurus grandis (Grey). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 31:227–281.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, L. 1908. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Rhinophiden. Integument, Drüson der Mundhohle, Augen und Skeletsystem. Zool. Jahrb; 26(Morph.): 423–526.Google Scholar
  5. Bellairs, A. d’A. 1949. Observations on the snout of Varanus, and a comparison with that of other lizards and snakes. J. Anat., 83:116–146.Google Scholar
  6. J. D. Boyd. 1950. The lachrymal apparatus in lizards and snakes.—II The anterior part of the lachrymal duct and its relationship with the palate and with the nasal and vomeronasal organs. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 120:269–310.Google Scholar
  7. J. D. Boyd. 1957. Anomalous cleft palate in snake embryos. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 129:525–539.Google Scholar
  8. G. Underwood. 1951. The origin of snakes. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc,26:193–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogert, C. M., and R. Martin del Campo. 1956. The Gila Monster and its allies. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 109:1–238.Google Scholar
  10. Camp, C. L. 1923. Classification of the lizards. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 48:289–481.Google Scholar
  11. Coe, C. W., and B. W. Kunkel. 1907. Studies on the California limbless lizard, Anniella. Trans. Connecticut Acad., 12:349–396.Google Scholar
  12. Cope, E. D. 1900. The crocodilians, lizards, and snakes of North America. Rept. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1898:153–1294.Google Scholar
  13. deBeer, G. 1937. The Development of the Vertebrate Skull. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Edmund, A. G. 1960. Tooth Replacement Phenomena in the Lower Vertebrates. Toronto, Royal Ontario Museum.Google Scholar
  15. Estes, R. 1962. A fossil gerrhosaur from the Miocene of Kenya (Reptilia: Cordylidae). Breviora, 158:1–10.Google Scholar
  16. T. H. Frazzetta, and E. E. Williams. 1970. Studies of the fossil snake Dinilysia patagonica Woodward: Part I. Cranial morphology. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. (Harvard) 140(2):25–74.Google Scholar
  17. Frazzetta, T. H. 1962. A functional consideration of cranial kinesis in lizards. J. Morph., 111:287–320. 1966. Studies on the morphology and function of the skull in the Boidae (Serpentes).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Part II. Morphology and function of the jaw apparatus in Python sebae and Python molurus. J. Morphol., 118:217–296.Google Scholar
  19. Gans, C. 1952. The functional morphology of the egg-eating adaptations of the snake genus Dasypeltis. Zoologica (New York), 37:209–244.Google Scholar
  20. Gans, C. 1961. The feeding mechanism of snakes and its possible evolution. Amer. Zool., 1:217–227.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, F. W. 1966. Head muscles of Boa constrictor. Zoologica (New York), 51:29–48.Google Scholar
  22. Gnanamuthu, C. P. 1937. Comparative study of the hyoid and tongue of some typical genera of reptiles. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 107(B): 1–63.Google Scholar
  23. Haas, G. 1955. The systematic position of Loxocemus bicolor Cope (Ophidia). Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1748:1–8.Google Scholar
  24. Haas, G. 1959. Bemerkungen über die Anatomie des Kopfes und des Schädels der Lepto-typhlopidae (Ophidia), speziell von L. macrorhynchus Jan. Vierteljahrschrift Naturforsch.Ges. Zurich, 104:104.Google Scholar
  25. Haas, G. 1960. On the trigeminus muscles of the lizards Xenosaurus grandis and Shinisaurus crocodilurus. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2017:1–54.Google Scholar
  26. Haas, G. 1964. Anatomical observations on the head of Liotyphlops albirostris (Typhlopidae, Ophidia). Acta Zool., 45:1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haas, G. 1968. Anatomical observations on the head of Anomalepis aspinosus (Typhlopidae, Ophidia). Acta Zool., 49:63–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrison, T., and N. S. Haile. 1961. A rare earless monitor lizard from Borneo. Nature (London), 218(4782): 1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jollie, M. T. 1960. The head skeleton of the lizard. Acta Zool. 41:1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamal, A. M. and H. G. Hammouda. 1965a. The development of the skull of Psammophis sibilans. J. Morphol., 116:197–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamal, A. M. and H. G. Hammouda. 1965b. The chondrocranium of the snake Eryx jaculus. Acta Zool., 46:167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kornhuber, A. 1873. Ein neuen fossilen Saurier aus Lesina. Abh. K. K. Geol. Reichsinst. Wien, 5:75–90.Google Scholar
  33. Langebartel, D. A. 1968. The Hyoid and its Associated Muscles in Snakes. Illinois Biol. Monogr. No. 38. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  34. List, J. C. 1966. Comparative Osteology of the Snake Families Typhlopidae and Leptotyphlopidae. Illinois Biol. Monogr., No. 36. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. McDowell, S. B. 1967. The extracolumella and tympanic cavity of the “earless” monitor lizard, Lanthanotus borneensis. Copeia, 1967: 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. And C. M. Bogert. 1954. The systematic position of Lanthanotus and the affinities of the anguimorphan lizards. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 105:1–142.Google Scholar
  38. Mertens, R. 1964. Beobachtungen an Taubwaranen {Lanthanotus borneensis) in Terrarium. Datz, 6:179–183.Google Scholar
  39. Myers, C. W. 1967. The familial position of Typhlophis Fitzinger (Serpentes). Herpeto- logica, 23:75–77.Google Scholar
  40. Nopcsa, F. 1908. Zur Kenntnis der fossilen Ediechsen. Beitr. Paläont. Oster.-Ungarns,21:5–62.Google Scholar
  41. Oelrich, T. M. 1956. The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae). Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool., No. 94. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  42. Prado, A. 1945. Serpentes do Brazil. Säo Paulo, Sitios e Fazendas.Google Scholar
  43. Pratt, C. W. McE. 1948. The morphology of the ethmoidal region of Sphenodon and lizards. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 118:171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rooij, N. de. 1915. The Reptiles of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. I. Lacertilia, Chelonia, Emydosauria. Leiden, E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  45. Schmidt, K. P. 1928. Notes on the herpetology of Indo-China. Copeia, 1928:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, H. M., and R. Warner. 1948. Evolution of the ophidian hyobranchium. Herpeto-logica, 4:189–193.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, M. A. 1943. The Fauna of British India Ceylon and Burma, Including the Whole of the Indo-Chinese Sub-Region. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. III. Serpentes. London, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  48. Sondhi, K. C. 1958. The hyoid and associated structures in some Indian reptiles. Ann. Zool., 2:155–239.Google Scholar
  49. Tchernavin, V. V. 1953. The feeding mechanisms of a deep sea fish Chauliodus sloani Schneider. London, British Museum [Natural History].Google Scholar
  50. Underwood, G. 1957. On lizards of the family Pygopodidae. J. Morph., 100:207–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warner, R. 1946. Pectoral girdles vs. hyobranchia in the snake genera Liotyphlops and Anomalepis. Science, 103:720–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Meredith Corporation 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Mcdowell
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations