Critical Issues in the Diagnosis of Urogenital Infections
The clinician and the laboratorian are aware of the wide variety of new and innovative methods for the diagnosis of urogenital disease. Subsequent papers in this volume will provide methodologic and analytical precision and accuracy of a variety of instruments and techniques for diagnosis. This review will focus on 3 areas of interest: a) a broad overview of technology, b) the relevance of laboratory data, and c) practical considerations of Beysian statistics as they apply to microbiology.
KeywordsBacterial Vaginosis Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Urine Screening Urogenital Infection Acute Cystitis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J.C. Fung, J. Shanley, and R.C. Tilton. Comparison of the Detection of HSV in Direct Clinical Specimens using HSV-specific DNA Probes and Monoclonal Antibodies. Abstr. Ann. Mtng. Am. Soc. Microbiol. S9, p. 283 (1985).Google Scholar
- 3.H.J. Shultz, McCaffrey, T.F. Keys and F.T. Nobrega. Acute Cystitis: A Prospective Study of Laboratory Tests and Duration of Therapy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 59, 391–397 (1984).Google Scholar
- 4.M.J.B. Ferraro, and L.J. Kuntz. Predictive Value of the Microbiologic Diagnostic Tests, pp. 248–253, in “Significance of Medical Microbiology in the Care of Patients,” 2nd ed. V.J. Lorian. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore (1982)Google Scholar