Structural Influences on the Electrochemistry of Ubiquinone
Summary
Ubiquinone, 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-polyprenyl-l,4- benzoquinone is almost ubiquitous in living organisms; why? One possibility is the presence of the 2,3 dimethoxy motif. Methoxy groups, in isolation, have two separate effects on the electrochemistry of the quinone nucleus; an inductive electron withdrawing effect, independent of orientation, and a resonant, electron donating effect where the lone pair of electrons on the methoxy oxygen becomes delocalized over the quinone enone system. This latter effect is very dependent on the orientation of the methoxy group relative to the ring, and cannot be achieved by both methoxy groups in the 2,3 — dimethoxy motif. This paper examines the possibility that the different binding sites for ubiquinone might modulate the relative orientations of the methoxy groups, and thereby impose different specificities and energetics on the redox properties of the quinone.
Keywords
Torsion Angle Methoxy Group Acta Cryst Structural Influence Steric ConstraintPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Knaff, D.B. (1975) FEBS Lett. 60, 331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Oalley, P.J., Babcock, G.T. and Prince, R.C. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 766, 283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Boussac, A. and Etienne, A.L. (1984) Biochim. Biophys., Acta 766, 576–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Prince, R.C., Dutton, P.L. and Bruce, J.M. (1983) FEBS Lett. 160 273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Prince, R.C., Lloyd-Williams, P., Bruce, J.M. and Dutton, P.L. (1986) Meth. Enzymol. 125, 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Silverman, J., Stam-Thole, I. and Stam, C.H. (1971) Acta Cryst. B27, 1846–1851Google Scholar
- 7.Schmalle, H.W., Jarchow, O.H., Hausen, B.M. and Schulz, K.H. (1984) Acta Cryst. C40, 1090–1094Google Scholar
- 8.Breen, D.L. (1975) J. Theor. Biol. 53, 101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Schmallef H.W., Jarchowf O.H., Hausen, B.M., Schulz, K.H. (1984) Acta Cryst. C40, 1084–1087Google Scholar
- 10.Schmalle, H.W. and Hausen, B.M. (1980) Tet. Lett. 21, 149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.GamberdIa, M.T.P., Mascarenhas, Y.P. and Santos, R.H.A. (1983) Acta Cryst. C39, 741–742Google Scholar
- 12.Schmalle, H.W. and Hausen, B.M. (1984) Acta Cryst. C40, 1092–1094Google Scholar
- 13.Schmalle, H.W., Jarchow, O.H., Hausen, B.M. and Schulz, K.H. (1984) Acta Cryst. C40, 1087–1092Google Scholar
- 14.Sygusch, J., Brisse, F., Hanessian, S. (1976) Acta Cryst. B32, 1139–1142Google Scholar
- 15.Ueda, I., Kawano, S., Ikeda, Y., Matsuki, H. and Ogawa, T. (1984) Acta Cryst. C40, 1578–1580Google Scholar
- 16.Tulinsky, A. and Van Den Hende, J.H. (1967) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 2905–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hayashi, T. and Nawata, Y. (1983) J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans II 335–345Google Scholar
- 18.Bobrowitz, F.W. and Goddard, W.A., III, (1977) in Modern Theoretical Chemistry, 3 (Schaeffer, H.F., ed) Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
- 19.Kleinfeld, D., Okamura, M.Y. and Feher, G. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 5780–5786CrossRefGoogle Scholar