Freud’s Impact on Modern Morality and Our World View

  • Robert R. Holt
Chapter
Part of the The Hastings Center Series in Ethics book series (HCSE)

Abstract

The world is in a moral crisis today, everyone agrees. It is little comfort that many people would have agreed with the preceding statement at just about any time in history. The older generation has worried about the decline in the moral fiber of the young at least since the time of the Greek philosophers, and we still have not quite succumbed. Such a general reassurance can hardly substitute for data, but it would be difficult indeed to conduct an empirical survey of the present moral state of the world, quite aside from the fact that comparable data from earlier times would be even more nearly impossible to obtain. In our huge and pluralistic world, there are many evidences of increased respect for life and for individual liberty, more social justice, and other moral desirables. It is very difficult to balance such trends against the many signs that monetary values override all others in many contexts, that unjustifiable exploitation and privilege are firmly entrenched, and that various types of crime are on the rise.

Keywords

Moral Development Moral Ideal Standard Edition World Hypothesis Conventional Morality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Schell, The Fate of the Earth, (New York: Avon, 1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion, (1927) Standard Edition, Vol. 21 (London: Hogarth, 1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy Schäfer, A New Language for Psychoanalysis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. R. Holt, “The Past and Future of Ego Psychology,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 44(1975):550–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul Roazen, Freud and His Followers (New York: Knopf, 1975), pp. 145ff.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. L. Freud and H. Meng, eds., Psychoanalysis and Faith: Dialogues with the Reverend Oskar Pfister, trans. E. Mosbacher (London: Hogarth Press, 1963), pp. 61–62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    They are, of course, often seriously mistaken in believing that they are looking out for themselves; let me only remind you of Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons.” (Cf. G. Hardin, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162[1968]: 1243–48.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. J. Sulloway, Freud, Biologist of the Mind (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Three Essays on Sexuality (1905), Standard Edition, 7:177.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Ego and the Id (1923), Standard Edition, 19.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Future of an Illusion (1927), Standard Edition, 21:53.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moses and Monotheism (1939), Standard Edition, 23:100.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cf. R. R. Holt, “On Freedom, Autonomy, and the Redirection of Psychoanalytic Theory: A Rejoinder,” International Journal of Psychiatry 3(1967):524–36; and “Freud’s Mechanistic and Humanistic Image of Man,” in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, Vol. 1, ed. R. R. Holt and E. Peterfreund (New York: Macmillan, 1972), 3–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paul Weiss, “The Living System: Determination Stratified,” in Beyond Reductionism, ed. A. Koestler and J. Smithies (New York: Macmillan, 1969).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    “Some Additional Notes on Dream-Interpretation as a Whole” (1925), Standard Edition, 19:133.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., p. 134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    I want to take at least brief notice of the fact that a case can be made for the proposition that the influence of organized religion has retardec the moral development of humankind.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philip Rieff, Freud: The Mind of the Moralist (New York: Viking, 1959).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cf. J. M. Baldwin, Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development (New York: Macmillan, 1897);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19a.
    L. T. Hobhouse, Morals in Evolution (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1906);Google Scholar
  21. 19b.
    Edward Westermarck, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1906–1908);Google Scholar
  22. 19c.
    William McDougall, An Introduction to Social Psychology (London: Me-thuen, 1908);Google Scholar
  23. 19d.
    and J. Dewey and J. Tufts, Ethics (New York: Holt, 1908).Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    Cf. Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the Child (New York: Free Press, 1932);Google Scholar
  25. 20a.
    L. Kohlberg, “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,” in Essays on Moral Development (New York: Harper & Row, 1981).Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    H. Hartmann, Essays on Ego Psychology (New York: International Universities Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    It is quite possible that much of the complaint about modern immorality comes from conventional persons alarmed by these signs of moral development.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Douglas Heath, Maturity and Competence (New York: Gardner, 1977);Google Scholar
  29. 23a.
    Andras Angyal, Foundations for a Science of Personality (New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1941).Google Scholar
  30. 24.
    D. Bakan, The Duality of Human Existence (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966).Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), Standard Edition, 18.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    The Ego and the Id, Standard Edition, 19:56, 59.Google Scholar
  33. 27.
    Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Standard Edition, 18.Google Scholar
  34. 28.
    Paul Roazen, Freud: Political and Social Thought (New York: Knopf, 1968).Google Scholar
  35. 29.
    M. Walzer, “Nervous Liberals” (Review of The Neoconservatives by Peter Steinfels) New York Review of Books 26(15):(1979), p. 6.Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    C. Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism (New York: Norton, 1979).Google Scholar
  37. 31.
    Psychoanalysis and Religion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950); You Shall Be as Gods (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
  38. 32.
    J. Loevinger, Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976).Google Scholar
  39. 33.
    R. R. Holt, “Loevinger’s Measure of Ego Development: Reliability and National Norms for Short Male and Female Forms,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,39,909–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 34.
    H. A. Murray, “Beyond Yesterday’s Idealisms” in Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, ed. E. S. Shneidman (New York: Harper & Row, 1981).Google Scholar
  41. 34.
    According to Carol Gilligan, In Another Voice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), women generally think about moral issues contex-tually and in terms of care and responsibility, while men tend to stress abstract justice. If her data can be generalized, the needed changes described above could be attained without the widespread structural growth that seems so hard to achieve, by society’s giving the alternative moral voice of community a more prominent role in the moral consensus. She stresses that it is by no means exclusive to women. (Note added in proof.)Google Scholar
  42. 35.
    S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1942).Google Scholar
  43. 36.
    **S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1942).**Ibid, p. 91.Google Scholar
  44. 37.
    The coherence of a world hypothesis is not that of a formal system and should not be taken to mean the rigid lucidity of deductive interconnectedness.Google Scholar
  45. 38.
    Totem and Taboo (1912–1913), Standard Edition, 13.Google Scholar
  46. 39.
    E. A. Burtt, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1932).Google Scholar
  47. 40.
    A. N. Whitehead, Science in the Modern World, rev. ed. (New York: Mentor, 1952).Google Scholar
  48. 41.
    Like formism and contextualism, it never captured the popular imagination as animism and mechanism have done.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    W. G. Perry, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970).Google Scholar
  50. 43.
    D. H. Munro, “Relativism in Ethics,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. P. P. Wiener, vol. 4 (New York: Scribner’s, 1973).Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    P. P. Wiener, “Pragmatism,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 3.Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    D. R. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
  53. 46.
    Wiener, “Pragmatism,” p. 553.Google Scholar
  54. 47.
    Pepper, World Hypotheses, p. 234.Google Scholar
  55. 48.
    G. Holton, “Einstein’s Task as a Universe Builder: His Early Years,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 33:1(1979): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 49.
    E. Erikson, “Psychoanalytic Reflections on Einstein’s Centenary,” in Albert Einstein, Historical and Cultural Perspectives, eds. G. Holton and Y. Elkana (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  57. 50.
    It is instructive if saddening to notice how often transference is construed— even by psychoanalysts themselves—as meaning simply falling in love with your analyst. Here Freud’s own sexual reductionism joined forces with the regressive temptation to which thought is always vulnerable. That tendency itself, incidentally, is another manifestation of the same thought pattern as transference, which Piaget called “assimilation.”Google Scholar
  58. 51.
    More precisely, those of Lorenz and Minkowski.Google Scholar
  59. 52.
    E. A. Burtt, “The Status of ‘World Hypotheses,’“Philosophical Review 52(1943):590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 53.
    Later, he did attempt to state his own fifth world hypothesis. Pepper, Concept and Quality: A World Hypothesis (LaSalle, 111.: Open Court, 1967).Google Scholar
  61. 54.
    Quoted in L. E. Hahn, “The Stephen C. Pepper Papers, 1903–1972,” Paunch 53–54(1980):75.Google Scholar
  62. 55.
    S. E. Hyman, The Tangled Bank (New York: Atheneum, 1962).Google Scholar
  63. 58.
    The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, vol. 3 (New York: Basic Books, 1957), 247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Hastings Center 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert R. Holt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations