Supercomputational Science pp 211-233 | Cite as
Electron Correlation in Small Molecules and the Configuration Interaction Method
Chapter
Abstract
These lectures are concerned with the quantum chemistry of small molecules, and the techniques which are applicable for the calculation of molecular properties. Throughout, the emphasis will be on attaining the highest possible accuracy for rather small systems, typically with up to about six atoms or around 10 to 20 valence electrons.
Keywords
Coupling Coefficient Configuration Interaction Self Consistent Field Slater Determinant Electron Correlation Effect
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ahlrichs, R., 1983, Pair Correlation Theories, in: “Methods in Computational Molecular Physics,” G. H. F. Diercksen and S. Wilson, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Bauschlicher, C. W., Langhoff, S. R., and Taylor, P. R., 1989, Adv. Chem. Phys.,in press. Davidson, E. R., 1975, J. Comput. Phys.,17:87.Google Scholar
- Davidson, E. R., 1983, Matrix Eigenvector Methods, in: “Methods in Computational Molecular Physics,” G. H. F. Diercksen and S. Wilson, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, R., 1980, “Practical Methods of Optimization, volume 1,” Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Foster, J. M., and Boys, S. F., 1960, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32: 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Handy, N. C., 1980, Chem. Phys. Letters, 74: 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrison, R. J., and Zarrabian, S., 1989, Chem. Phys. Letters, in press.Google Scholar
- Jeffreys, H. and Jeffreys, B., 1956, “Methods of Mathematical Physics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Jørgensen, P., and Simons, J., 1981, “Second Quantization-Based Methods in Quantum Chemistry,” Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Knowles, P. J. and Handy, N. C., 1984, Chem. Phys. Letters, 111: 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knowles, P. J. and Handy, N. C., 1989, Comp. Phys. Commun., 54: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knowles, P. J. and Handy, N. C., 1989, J. Chem. Phys., 91: 2396.Google Scholar
- Knowles, P. J., and Werner, H.-J., 1985, Chem. Phys. Letters, 115: 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knowles, P. J., and Werner, H.-J., 1988, Chem. Phys. Letters, 145: 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knowles, P. J., 1989, Chem. Phys. Letters, 155: 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knowles, P. J., 1989, J. Chem. Phys., in preparation.Google Scholar
- Kotani, M., Amemiya, A., Ishiguro, E., and Kimura, T., 1963, “Tables of molecular integrals,” Maruzen, Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Lanczos, C., 1950, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 45: 255.Google Scholar
- Lischka, H., Shepard, R., Brown, F. B., and Shavitt, I., 1981, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp., 15: 91.Google Scholar
- Liu, B., 1978, in: “Numerical Algorithms in Chemistry: Algebraic Methods,” C. Moler and I. Shavitt, ed., LBL-8158 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, J. K. L., 1933, Phys. Rev., 43: 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McWeeny, R., and Sutcliffe, B. T., 1969, “Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics,” Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Meyer, W., 1976, J. Chem. Phys., 64: 2901.Google Scholar
- Meyer, W., 1977, in: “Modern Theoretical Chemistry,” vol. 3, H.F. Schaefer, ed., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
- Olsen, J., Roos, B. O., Jorgensen, P., and Jensen, H. J. Aa., 1988, J. Chem. Phys., 89: 2185.Google Scholar
- Pack, R. T. and Byers Brown, W., 1966, J. Chem. Phys., 45: 556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paldus, J., 1974, J. Chem. Phys., 61: 5321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roos, B., Taylor, P., and Siegbahn, P. E. M., 1980, Chem. Phys., 48: 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roos, B. 0., 1972, Chem. Phys. Letters, 15: 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roothaan, C. C. J., 1951, Rev. Mod. Phys., 23: 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruedenberg, K., Cheung, L. M., and Elbert, S. T., 1979, Intern. J. Quantum Chem., 16: 1069Google Scholar
- Saunders, V. R., and van Lenthe, J. H., 1983, Mol. Phys., 48: 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saxe, P., Schaefer, H. F., and Handy, N. C., 1981, Chem. Phys. Letters, 79: 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seeger, R., Krishnan, R., and Pople, J. A., 1978, J. Chem. Phys., 68: 2519.Google Scholar
- Shavitt, I., 1978, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp., 12: 5.Google Scholar
- Shepard, R., 1989, J. Comp. Chem., in press.Google Scholar
- Siegbahn, P. E. M., 1984, Chem. Phys. Letters, 109: 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siegbahn, P. E. M., 1980, J. Chem. Phys., 72: 1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werner, H.-J., and Knowles, P. J., 1985, J. Chem. Phys., 82: 5053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werner, H.-J., and Knowles, P. J., 1988, J. Chem. Phys., 89: 5803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werner, H.-J., and Meyer, W., 1980, J. Chem. Phys., 73: 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werner, H.-J., and Reinsch, E.-A., 1982, J. Chem. Phys., 76: 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson, J. H., 1965, “The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem”, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Yoshimine, M., 1973, J. Comp. Phys., 11: 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zarrabian, S., Sarma, C. R., and Paldus, J., 1989, Chem. Phys. Letters, 155: 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Plenum Press, New York 1990