Genotoxicity of Antiamebic, Anthelmintic, and Antimycotic Drugs in Human Lymphocytes

  • P. Ostrosky-Wegman
  • G. García
  • L. Arellano
  • J. J. Espinosa
  • R. Montero
  • C. Cortinas de Nava

Abstract

The use of amebicidal, anthelmintic, and antimycotic drugs in Mexico is widespread. Few studies have evaluated the mutagenic activity of the most commonly used antiparasitic drugs. Of these, the majority of the mutagenic evaluations have been conducted in microbial test systems and have yielded inconsistent results (1-5). Experiments in our laboratory using the Salmonella typhimurium microsomal test system have shown that niclosamide (anthelmintic) and dehydroemetine (amebicide) induce frameshift mutations following activation by microsomal enzymes (6). While neither chloroquine di phosphate (amebicide) nor ketoconazole (antimycotic) display mutagenic activity on the standard Ames test (unpublished observations for ketoconazole), the former induces frameshift mutations in the fluctuation test. Mutagenic activity has also been detected in the urine of mice treated with niclosamide (6). The capacity of chloroquine diphosphate to bind DNA is well documented (7) , and it has also been reported to induce clumping in nuclei, as well as to produce chromosomal abnormalities in a bone marrow cell line (8) . In view of these data we decided to evaluate the genotoxic effects produced in vitro in human lymphocytes, cultured with or without the addition of an auxiliary metabolic test system, by 4 antiparasitic drugs: chloroquine diphosphate, deyhdroemetine, niclosamide, and ketoconazole. Furthermore, we monitored chromosomal changes in lymphocytes of 2 patients treated chronically with ketoconazole.

Keywords

Human Lymphocyte Mutagenic Activity Genotoxic Effect Sister Chromatid Exchange Microsomal Enzyme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tutikawa, K., N. Shimoi, and Y. Yagi (1978) Mutagenicity of the products generated by a reaction between chloroquine and ni trite. Mutat. Res. 54:230.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacPhee, D.G., and D.M. Podger (1977) Mutagenicity tests on anthelmintics: Microsomal activation of viprynium embonate to a mutagen. Mutat. Res. 48:307–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schüpbach, M.E. (1979) Mutagenicity evaluation of the two antimalarial agents chloroquine and mefloquine, using a bacterial fluctuation test. Mutat. Res. 68:41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenkranz, H.S., B. Gutter, and W.T. Speck (1976) Mutagenicity and DNA-modifying activity: A comparison of two microbial assays. Mutat. Res. 41:61–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein, S.S., J. Andrea, W. Bass, and I. Bishop (1972) Detection of chemical mutagens by dominant lethal assay in mouse. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 23:288–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortinas de Nava, C., J. Espinosa, L. Garcia, A.M. Zapata, and E. Martinez (1983) Mutagenicity of antiamebic and anthelmintic drugs in the Salmonella typhimurium microsomal test system. Mutat. Res. 117:79–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hahn, F.E. (1968) Interaction of antimalarials with DNA. Hoppe Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 349:955–956.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siddique, K.M., and J. Biesele (1974) Chromosomal and mitotic damages by chloroquine diphosphate, an antimalarial and antirheumatic drug, on cultured human cells. Tex. J. Sci. 21:125–126.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moorhead, P.S., P.C. Nowell, W.J. Mellman, D.M. Battips, and D.A. Hungerford (1960) Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp. Cell Res. 20:613–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ames, B.N., J. McCann, and E. Yamasaki (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella mamma-lian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res. 31:347–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crossen, P.E. (1982) Variation in the sensitivity of human lymphocytes to DNA-damaging agents measured by sister chromatid exchange frequency. Human Genet. 60:19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stevenson, A.C., and C. Patel (1973) Effects of chlorambucil on human chromosomes. Mutat. Res. 18:333–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weinstein, D., I. Mauer, and H.M. Solomon (1972) The effect of caffeine on chromosomes of human lymphocytes. In vivo and in vitro studies. Mutat. Res. 16:391–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gebhart, E. (1981) Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing. HumanGenet. 58:235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Ostrosky-Wegman
    • 1
  • G. García
    • 1
  • L. Arellano
    • 1
  • J. J. Espinosa
    • 1
  • R. Montero
    • 1
  • C. Cortinas de Nava
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones BiomédicasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxico D.F.México

Personalised recommendations