Restriction Endonucleases, DNA Sequencing, and Computers

  • Richard J. Roberts


Among the 250 Type II restriction endonucleases now characterized, there are more than 70 different specificities1 and yet there is no indication that the range of specificities is exausted. Indeed, there is good reason to believe that hundreds, if not thousands, of different specificities would be found if a diligent search were carried out. One reason for this speculation is illustrated in Table 1, which shows the range of sequence patterns with which different Type II restriction endonucleases interact. Among the simple symmetric hexanucleotide sequences designated here as Class A, almost half of the possible sequence patterns are already represented by well-characterized enzymes. There is no reason to believe that a similar number of enzymes will not be found for the other patterns in Classes B through F. Similarly, it seems likely that enzymes recognizing degenerate patterns, like HgiAI and AccI, are not the sole representatives of the class. Within the last year alone, five new classes (C, D, F, N, and O) were added to this list.


Sequence Pattern Sequence File Diligent Search Clone Bank Dyad Axis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.J. Roberts, Nucletic Acids Res. 9: 75 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B-C. Lin, M-C. Chien and S-Y. Lou, Nucleic Acids Res. 8: 6189 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.W. Kan and A.M. Dozy, Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 75: 5631 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.H.T.van der Ploeg and R.A. Flavell, Cell 19: 947 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.M. Maxam and W. Gilbert, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 560 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Sanger and A.R. Coulson, J. Mol. Biol. 94: 441 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Sanger, S. Nicklen and A.R. Coulson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74: 5463 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.J.H. Smith, Nucleic Acids Res. 6: 831 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Sanger, A.R. Coulson, B.G. Barrell, A.J.H. Smith and B.A. Rowe, J. Mol. Biol. 143: 161 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Messing, R. Crea and P.H. Seeburg, Nucleic Acids Res. 9: 309 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.R. Gingeras and R.J. Roberts, Science 209: 1322 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Staden, Nucleic Acids Res. 8: 817 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.Fuchs, E.C.Rosenvold, A.Honigman and W.Szyblaski, Gene 4: 1 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.R.Gingeras, J.P.Milazzo and R.J.Roberts, Nucleic Acid Res. 5: 4105 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.Stefik, Artif. Intell. 11: 85 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.L.Schroeder and F.Blattner, Gene 4: 167 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.Staden, Nucleic Acids Res. 6: 2601 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T.R.Gingeras, J.P.Milazzo, D.Sciaky and R.J.Roberts, Nucleic Acids Res. 7: 529 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryCold Spring HarborUSA

Personalised recommendations