Phylogenetic Relationships of the Platyrrhini

The Evidence of the Femur
  • S. M. Ford
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

The major problem addressed in this volume concerns the origin of the New World monkeys. This problem is sometimes simplified to the question of whether they came from North America or from Africa. However, the biological problem is actually more complex and can be treated as four separate hypotheses: (1) descent of platyrrhines from an omomyid ancestor from North America, independent of catarrhines (Gazin, 1958; Orlosky and Swindler, 1975; Patterson and Pascual, 1972, Stirton, 1951; Stirton and Savage, 1950; Szalay, 1975; Wood, 1973, 1977); (2) descent from adapids, again independent of catarrhines (Gingerich, 1973); (3) origin of a monophyletic Anthropoidea, from either omomyids or adapids. Anthropoidea may have evolved in Holarctica, with later independent southern migrations of catarrhines into Africa and platyrrhines into South America (Gingerich, 1975, 1977; Gingerich and Schoeninger, 1977; Simons, 1969, 1976; Simpson, 1978). Alternately, anthropoids may have evolved in Africa, with the subsequent introduction of platyrrhines into South America from Africa, most likely via rafting (Genet-Varcin, 1974; Hoffstetter, 1972, 1974; Lavocat, 1974; see also Szalay, 1976, for the possibility of a South American origin with subsequent rafting of catarrhines to Africa). In either case, the closest relatives of platyrrhines would be the Catarrhini. (4) The fourth possibility is that platyrrhines have a Cretaceous, pre-rift, African origin and may even be polyphyletic (Hershkovitz, 1972, 1974, 1977). Should this be the case, platyrrhines would not be expected to show any close, unified relationship to other primate groups of later origin, e.g., omomyids, adapids, or catarrhines.

Keywords

Character State World Monkey Distal Epiphysis Postcranial Skeleton Patellar Groove 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler, P. M. 1977, Evolutionary radiation of the cheek teeth of Cretaceous placentals, Acta Palaeontol. Polon. 22: 240–269.Google Scholar
  2. Calhoun, T. P., 1977, Sesamoid structures in primate hands, Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 20: 525–537.Google Scholar
  3. Cartmill, M., and Milton, K., 1977, The lorisiform wrist joint and the evolution of “brachiating” adaptations in the Hominoidea, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 47: 249–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciochon, R. L., and Corruccini, R. S., 1975, Morphometric analysis of platyrrhine feinora with taxonomic implications and notes on two fossil forms, J. Hum. Evol. 4: 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conroy, G. C., 1976, Primate postcranial remains from the Oligocene of Egypt, Contrib. Primatol. 8: 1–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Decker, R. L., and Szalay, F. S., 1974, Origins and function of the pes in the Eocene Adapidae (Lemuriformes, Primates), in: Primate Locomotion ( F. A. Jenkins, ed.), pp. 261–291, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Delson, E., and Andrews, P., 1975, Evolution and interrelationships of the catarrhine primates, in: Phylogeny of the Primates ( W. P. Luckett and F. S. Szalay, eds.), pp. 405–446, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enders, R. K., 1930, Notes on some mammals from Barro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, J. Mammal. 11: 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enders, R. K., 1935, Mammalian life histories from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 78: 385–502.Google Scholar
  10. Gazin, C. L., 1958, A review of the Middle and Upper Eocene primates of North America, Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 136 (1): 1–112.Google Scholar
  11. Genet-Varcin, E., 1974, Platyrrhine contribution to the phylogeny of the primates, J. Hum. Evol. 3: 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gingerich, P. D., 1973, Anatomy of the temporal bone in the Oligocene anthropoid Apidium and the origin of Anthropoidea, Folia Primatol. 19: 329–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gingerich, P. D., 1975, A new genus of Adapidae (Mammalia, Primates) from the Late Eocene of Southern France and its significance for the origin of higher primates, Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24: 163–170.Google Scholar
  14. Gingerich, P. D., 1977, Radiation of Eocene Adapidae in Europe, Geobios, Mém. Spéc. 1: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gingerich, P. D., and Schoeninger, M., 1977, The fossil record and primate phylogeny, J. Hum. Evol. 6: 463–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Godfrey, L., 1976, Postcranial osteology and the positional and postural behavior of the genus Lepilemur; implications for lemur phylogeny (abstract), Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 44: 180–181.Google Scholar
  17. Gregory, W. K., 1910, The orders of mammals, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27: 1–524.Google Scholar
  18. Hecht, M. K., 1976, Phylogenetic inference and methodology as applied to the vertebrate record, Evol. Biol. 9: 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hecht, M. K., and Edwards, J. L., 1977, The methodology of phylogenetic inference above the species level, in: Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution ( M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht, eds.), pp. 3–51, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hershkovitz, P., 1972, The recent mammals of the Neotropical region: A zoogeographic and ecological review, in: Evolution, Mammals and Southern Continents ( A. Keast, F. C. Erk, and B. Glass, eds.), pp. 311–431. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  21. Hershkovitz, P., 1974, A new genus of Late Oligocene monkey (Cebidae, Platyrrhini) with notes on postorbital closure and platyrrhine evolution. Folia Primatol. 21: 1–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hershkovitz, P., 1977, Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini) with an Introduction to the Primates, Vol. 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffstetter, R., 1972, Relationships, origins, and history of the ceboid monkeys and caviomorph rodents: A modern reinterpretation, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6 ( Th. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds.), pp. 323–347, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffstetter, R., 1974, Phylogeny and geographical deployment of the primates, J. Hum. Evol. 3: 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howell, A. B., 1932, The saltatorial rodent Dipodomys: The functional and comparative anatomy of its muscular and osseous systems. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts. Sci. 67: 377–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howell, A. B., 1944, Speed in Animals (1965 facsimile of 1944 edition), Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, F. A., Jr., 1971, The post-cranial skeleton of African cynodonts, Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 36: 1–216.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkins, F. A., Jr., and Parrington, F. R., 1976, The postcranial skeletons of the Triassic mammals Eozostrodon, Megazostrodon and Erythrotherium, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B 273: 387–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jungers, W. L., 1979, Adaptive diversity in subfossil Malagasy prosimians, Abstracts of the VIIth International Congress of Primatology, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  30. Kavenaugh, D. H., 1972, Hennig’s principles and methods of phylogenetic systematics, Biologist 54: 115–127.Google Scholar
  31. Kemp, T. S., 1978, Stance and gait in the hindlimb of a therocephalian mammal-like reptile, J. Zool., London 186: 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., 1977, Evolution of the therian mammals in the Late Cretaceous of Asia. Part II: Postcranial skeleton in Kennalestes and Asioryctes, Paleontol. Polon. 37: 65–83.Google Scholar
  33. Kinzey, W. G., Rosenberger, A. L., and Ramirez, M., 1975, Vertical clinging and leaping in a Neotropical anthropoid, Nature 255: 327–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kluge, A. G., and Farris, J. S., 1969, Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans, Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krishtalka, L., and Schwartz, J. H., 1978, Phylogenetic relationships of plesiadapiformtarsiiform primates, Ann. Carnegie Mus. 47: 515–540.Google Scholar
  36. Lavocat, R., 1974, The interrelationships between the African and South American rodents and their bearing on the problems of the origin of South American monkeys, J. Hum. Evol. 3: 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, O. J., 1974. The wrist articulations of the Anthropoidea, in: Primate Locomotion ( F. A. Jenkins, Jr., ed.), pp. 143–169, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. MacFadden, B. J., 1976, Cladistic analysis of primitive equids, with notes on other perissodactyls, Syst. Zool. 25: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthew, N. D., 1937, Paleocene faunas of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., N.S. 30: 1–510.Google Scholar
  40. Moynihan, M., 1976, The New World Primates, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  41. Napier, J. R., and Walker, A. C., 1967, Vertical clinging and leaping in living and fossil primates, in: Progress in Primatology ( D. Starck, R. Schneider, and H. J. Kuhn, eds.), pp. 66–69, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  42. Novacek, M. J., 1977, Evolution and relationships of the Leptictidae (Eutheria: Mammalia), Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  43. Novacek, M. J., 1980, Cranioskeletal features in tupaiids and selected Eutheria as phylogenetic evidence, in: Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews (W. P. Luckett, ed.), Advances in Primatology, Vol. 4, pp. 35–93, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Orlosky, F. J., and Swindler, D. R., 1975, Origins of New World monkeys, J. Hum. Evol. 4: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parrington, F. R., 1961, The evolution of the mammalian femur, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 137: 285–298.Google Scholar
  46. Patterson, B., and Pascual, R., 1972, The fossil mammal fauna of South America, in: Evolution, Mammals, and Southern Continents ( A. Keast, F. C. Erk, and B. Glass, eds.), pp. 247–310, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  47. Radinsky, L. B., 1966, The adaptive radiation of the phenacodontid condylarths and the origin of the Perissodactyla, Evolution 20: 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinette, H. R., 1968, Comparative study of the calcanea of some members of the Pinnipedia, M.S. thesis, Department of Zoology, South Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
  49. Robinette, H. R., and Stains, H. J., 1970, Comparative study of the calcanea of the Pinnipedia, J. Mammal. 51: 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Romankowowa, A., 1963a, Comparative study of the skeleton of the hyoid apparatus in some bat species, Acta Theriol. 7: 15–23.Google Scholar
  51. Romankowowa, A., 1963b, Comparative study of the structure of the os calcaneum in insectivores and rodents, Acta Theriol. 7: 91–126.Google Scholar
  52. Romer, A. S., 1922, The locomotor apparatus of certain primitive and mammal-like reptiles, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 46: 517–606.Google Scholar
  53. Simon, E. L., 1969, The origin and radiation of the Primates, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 167: 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simons, E., 1976, The fossil record of primate phylogeny, in: Molecular Anthropology ( M. Goodman and R. E. ‘l’ashian, eds.), pp. 35–62, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simpson, G. G., 1935, The Tiffany fauna, Upper Paleocene: II. Structure and relationships of Plesiadapis, Am. Mus. Nov., No. 816.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson, G. G., 1940, Studies on the earliest primates, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 77: 185–212.Google Scholar
  57. Simpson, G. G., 1978, Early mammals in South America, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 122: 318–328.Google Scholar
  58. Stains, H. J., 1962, Osteological data used in mammal classification, Syst. Zool. 11: 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern, J. ‘F., Jr., 1971, Functional myology of the hip and thigh of cebid monkeys and its implications for the evolution of erect posture, Bib. Primatol. No. 14.Google Scholar
  60. Stirton, R. A., 1951, Cehoid monkeys from the Miocene of Colombia, Bull. Univ. Calif Publ. Geol. Sci. 28: 315–356.Google Scholar
  61. Stirton, R. A., and Savage, D. E., 1950, A new monkey from the La Venta Miocene of Colombia, Compd. Estud. Geol. Ofic. Colombia, Serv. Geol. Nac., Bogold. 8: 345–356.Google Scholar
  62. Szalay, F. S., 1975, Phylogeny, adaptations, and dispersal of tarsiiform primates, in: Phylogeny of the Primates ( W. P. Iuckett and F. S. Szalay, eds.), pp. 357–404, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Szalay, F. S., 1976, Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): Taxonomy phylogeny, and adaptations, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156: 157–450.Google Scholar
  64. Szalay, F. S., 1977a, Phylogenetic relationships and a classification of the eutherian Mammalia, in: Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution ( M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht, eds.), pp. 315–374, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Szalay, F. S., 1977b, Constructing primate phylogenies: A search for testable hypotheses with maximum empirical content, J. Hum. Evol. 6: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Szalay, F. S., and Decker, R. L., 1974, Origins, evolution, and function of the tarsus in Late Cretaceous Eutheria and Paleocene primates, in: Primate Locomotion ( F. A. Jenkins, Jr., ed.), pp. 223–259, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Szalay, F. S., Tattersall, I., and Decker, R. L., 1975, Phylogenetic relationships of Plesiadapispostcranial evidence, Contrib. Primatol. 5: 136–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, B. K., 1978, The anatomy of the forelimb in the anteater (Tamandua) and its functional implications, J. Morphol. 157: 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Valen, L., and Sloan, R. E., 1965, The earliest primates, Science 150: 743–745.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walker, E. P., 1975, Mammals of the World, 3rd Ed., Vol. 1, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  71. Wood, A. E., 1973, Eocene rodents, Pruett Formation, Southwest Texas: Their pertinence to the origin of the South American Caviomorpha, Texas Mem. Mus., Pearce-Sellards Ser. 20: 1–41.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, A. E., 1977, The Rodentia as clues to Cenozoic migrations between the Americas and Europe and Africa, in: Paleontology and Plate Tectonics (R. M. West, ed.), Milwaukee Public Mus. Spec. Publ. Biol. Geol. No. 2, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Ford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations