A New Experimental Study of Multiple Ionization in Noble Gases by Electron and Photon Impact
Abstract
The main topics of this summer school are effects which are due to electron correlations in atoms. One of the most powerful methods used to study the influence of electron correlations is multiple ionization of rare gases produced by electron or photon impact. This is due to the fact that the operator which causes the ionization process is a one-particle operator. Therefore, a theory that takes into account neither electron correlation nor rearrangement of the electron orbitals after the ionization process will allow only singly charged ions. When secondary processes as for instance the Auger effect are excluded, then the appearance of multiply charged ions is due to electron correlations and rearrangement of the electrons. This clear statement is true only for the photon impact experiment. For electron impact, it is valid only in first Born approximation and even then the large range of momentum transfers in the collision process makes the interpretation more difficult.
Keywords
Electron Correlation Ionization Cross Section Multiple Ionization Dipole Matrix Element Intrinsic ErrorPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1).M.J. van der Wiel, Th.M. El-Sherbini and L. Vriens, Riysica 42 (1969) 411.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 2).T.A. Carlson, Phys. Rev. 156 (1967) 142.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3).M.J. van der Wiel and G. Wiebes, Physica 53 (1971) 225ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3a).M.J. van der Wiel and G. Wiebes, Physica 54 (1971) 411.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4).F.W. Byron and C.J. Joachain, Phys. Rev. 164 (1967) 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5).R.L. Brown, Phys. Rev. A1 (1970) 586.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 6).T.N. Chang, T. Ishihara and R.T. Poe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1971) 838.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7).T.N. Chang and R.T. Poe, Phys. Rev. A12, 1432 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 8).V. Schmidt, N. Sandner and H. Kuntzemüller, submitted to Phys. Rev. A.Google Scholar
- 9).J.P. Ziesel, J. Chim. phys. 62 (1965) 328.Google Scholar
- 10).A. Gaudin et R. Hagemann, J. Chim. Phys. 64 (1967) 1209.Google Scholar
- 11).B.L. Schram, A.J.H. Boerboom and J. Kistemaker, Physica 32 (1966) 185.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12).B.L. Schram, Physica 32 (1966) 197.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13).B. Adamczyk, A.J.H. Boerboom, B.L. Schram and J. Kistemaker, J. Chem. Phys. 44 (1966) 4640.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14).P. Jaeglé, J. Physique 24 (1963) 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14a).P. Jaeglé, Comptes Rendus 259 (1964) 533 and 4556.Google Scholar
- 15).P. Dhez, P. Jaeglé and F. Wuilleumier, in Vacuum UV Radiation Physics, ed. by E.E. Koch, R. Haensel and C. Kunz, Pergamon Vieweg (1974) 788.Google Scholar
- 16).V. Schmidt, N. Sandner, H. Kuntzemüller, P. Dhez, F. Wuilleumier and E. Källne, submitted to Phys. Rev. A.Google Scholar
- 17).J.A.R. Samson and G.N. Haddad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 875.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18).I thank Dr. M. van der Wiel very much for the early communication of his new results.Google Scholar
- 19).M. Ya. Amusia, VIII ICPEAC, ed. by B.C. Cobic and M.V. Kurepa, Inst, of Phys., Beograd, Yugoslavia (1973) 171.Google Scholar
- 20).W.D. West and G.V. Marr, to be published in Proc. Roy. Soc.Google Scholar
- 21).G.S. Lightner, R.J. van Brunt and D. Whitehead, Phys. Rev. A4 (1971) 602.ADSGoogle Scholar