Enzymatic studies on the skeletal myosin A and actomyosin of aging rats

  • G. Kaldor
  • B. K. Min
Part of the Faseb Monographs book series (FASEBM, volume 3)

Abstract

Myosin A and actomyosin were isolated from the skeletal muscle of old and young rats. The velocity of the Ca2+ activated myosin A ATPase was increased in the case of the older animals. On the other hand the velocity of the Mg2+ activated actomyosin ATPase was decreased in the skeletal muscle of the aging rats. At 5 × 10−5 m EGTA concentration the inhibition of the Mg2+ activated myosin B ATPase of the 1-month-old rats was two- to threefold smaller than that of the older animals. It was shown that the myosin A component of the actomyosin was responsible for the decreased troponin inhibition in the case of the 1-month-old rats. Between the ages of 1 month and 29 months the number of free myosin A SH groups decreases by 50%. The lipid peroxidation in the muscle tissue of the 29-month-old rats was threefold greater than that in the muscle of the 1-month-old animals. —Kaldor, G., and B. K. Min. Enzymatic studies on the skeletal myosin A and actomyosin of aging rats. Federation Proc. 34: 191–194, 1975.

Keywords

Enzymatic Study Skeletal Myosin EGTA Concentration Arul Aging Activate ATPase Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

Km

Michaelis constant

Vm

maximal velocity

Eact

Energy of activation

SDS

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

EGTA

Ethylene glycol-bis-(ß-aminoethylether)-N, N-tetra acetic acid

Pi

inorganic phosphate

µmole Pi mg prot−1 min−1

µmole inorganic phosphate liberated by 1 mg enzyme protein in 1 minute.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailin, G., and M. Barany. J. Mechanochem. Cell Motility1: 189, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barber, A. A., and F. Bernheim. Advan. Gerontol. Res. 2: 355, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernheim, F., M. L. C. Bernheim and K. M. Wilbur. J. Biol. Chem. 174: 257, 1948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebashi, S., and F. Ebashi. J. Biochem, Tokyo 55: 604, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaldor, G. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 127: 22, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaldor, G., J. Gitlin, F. Westley and B. W. VolkBiochemistry 3: 1137, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaldor, G., and Q. S. Hsu. Physiol. Chem. Phys. 6: 67, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowey, S., H. S. Slayter, A. G. Weeds and H. Baker. J. Mol. Biol. 42: 1, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mommaerts, W. F. H. M., Methods Med. Res.7: 1, 1958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paterson, B., and R. C. Strohman. Biochemistry 9: 4094, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlieselfeld, L. H., and G. Kaldor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 328: 481, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsao, T. C., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 11: 368, 1953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wachsberger, P., and G. Kaldor. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 143: 127, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of American Societies 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kaldor
    • 1
  • B. K. Min
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and BiophysicsThe Medical College of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations