Toward a Phylogenetic Classification of the Mammalia

  • Malcolm C. McKenna

Abstract

Periodically it is worthwhile to assess our knowledge and understanding of mammalian phylogeny and one of its expressions, classification. This short paper is yet another attempt to do so, taking into account the results of recently published paleontological research and drawing heavily on work in progress by many researchers in many fields and in various parts of the world. Concepts of mammalian phylogeny and classification have changed markedly during the last few years. A good many of the ideas expressed here are frankly speculative, but they are presented anyway in order to determine how well they will stand scrutiny, especially by nonpaleontologists. A few years ago I prepared a paper with a similar aim (McKenna, 1969), but that paper is now outdated. In the present offering I attempt to update certain aspects of my previous review by taking into account research published since 1969, as well as work being incorporated into a new classification of the Mammalia now being prepared which wall deal with all taxonomic levels down to the subgeneric level in essentially the same style as Simpson’s (1945) classification.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashlock, P. D. 1974. The uses of cladistics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.5:81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belyaeva, E. I., B. A. Trofimov, and V. Y. Reshetov. 1974 [Translation]. Fundamental stages in the evolution of mammals of the late Mesozoic-Paleogene of central Asia. In N. N. Kramerenko, V. Luvsanvandan, Y. I. Voronin, R. Barsbold, A. K. Rozhdestvensky, B. A. Trofimov, and V. Y. Reshetov, eds., Mesozoic andCenozoic Faunas and Biostratigraphy of Mongolia. The Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition, Trans., I, Science Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
  3. Bohlin, B. 1951. Some mammalian remains from Shih-ehr-ma-ch’eng, Hui-hui-p’u area, western Kansu, pp. 1–47. In S. Hedin. Reports from the Scientific Expedition to the North-Western Provinces of China, Vol. 6. Vertebrate Paleontology 5, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  4. Brundin, L. 1966. Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the austral Heptagyiae. K. Sven. Vetenskakad. Handl., Ser. 4 11:1–472 (especially pp. 11–45).Google Scholar
  5. Butler, P. M. 1972. The problem of insectivore classification, pp. 253–265. In K. A. Joysey and T. R. Kemp, eds., Studies in Vertebrate Evolution. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, P. M. 1973. A pantotherian milk dentition. Paläeontol. Z.47(3/4): 256–258.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, P. M., and Z. Kielan-Jaworowska. 1973. Is Deltatheridium a marsupial? Nature245:105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chow, M. M. 1974. Light on fossil animals and ancient geography. China Reconstructs22(12): 47–48.Google Scholar
  9. Chow, M. M., Y. Chang, B. Wang, and S. Ting. 1973. New mammalian genera and species from the Paleocene of Nanhsiung Basin, N. Kwangtung. Vert. PalAsiatica11(1): 31–35.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, W. E. Le Gros. 1926. On the anatomy of the pen-tailed tree-shrew (Ptilocercus lowii). Proc. Zool. Soc. London1926:1179–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clemens, W. A. 1973. Fossil mammals of the type Lance Formation, Wyoming. Part III. Eutheria and summary. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci.94:i–vi, 1–102.Google Scholar
  12. Clemens, W. A., and J. R. E. Mills. 1971. Review of Peramus tenuirostris Owen (Eupantotheria, Mammalia). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol20(3): 89–113.Google Scholar
  13. Corbet, G. B., and J. Hanks. 1968. A revision of the elephant-shrews, Family Macroscelididae. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool.16(2): 5–111.Google Scholar
  14. Crompton, A. W. 1974. The dentitions and relationships of the southern African Triassic mammals, Erythrotherium parringtoni and Megazostrodon rudnerae. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.)24(7): 397–437.Google Scholar
  15. Emry, R. J. 1970. A North American Oligocene pangolin and other additions to the Pholidota. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.142(6): 455–510.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, F. G. 1942. The osteology and relationships of the elephant shrews (Macroscelididae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.80(4): 85–125.Google Scholar
  17. Flower, W. H. 1882. On the mutual affinities of the animals composing the order Edentata. Proc. Zool. Soc. London1882:358–367.Google Scholar
  18. Forbes, W. A. 1882. On some points in the anatomy of the great anteater (Myrmecophaga jubata). Proc. Zool. Soc. London1882:287–302.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, R. C. 1974. Deltatheroides-like mammals from the upper Cretaceous of North America. Nature249(5455): 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill, T. 1872. Arrangement of the families of mammals; with analytical tables. Smithson. Misc. Collect.11(1):v, vi, 1–98.Google Scholar
  21. Godet, R. 1949. Recherches d’anatomie, d’embryologie normale et expérimentale sur l’appareil génital de la taupe. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg.83:25–111.Google Scholar
  22. Grassé, P.-P. 1955a. Ordre des Édentés, pp. 1182–1246, 1262–1266. In P.-P. Grassé, ed., Traité de Zoologie, Vol. 17, Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Grasse, P.P. 1955b. Ordre des Insectivores, pp. 1574–1653, 1705–1712. In P.-P. Grassé, ed., Traité de Zoologie, Vol. 17, Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, W. K. 1910. The orders of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.27:1–524.Google Scholar
  25. Griffiths, G. C. D. 1972. The Phylogenetic Classification of Diptera Cyclorrhapha, with Special Reference to the Male Postabdomen. 2. Principles and procedures of classification, pp. 5–28, W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  26. Guth, C. 1962. Un insectivore de Menat. Ann. Paléont.48:1–10.Google Scholar
  27. Hahn, G. 1973. Neue Zähne von Haramiyiden aus der Deutchen Ober-Trias und ihre Beziehungen zu den Multituberculaten. Paleontographica142(A): 1–15.Google Scholar
  28. Hennig, W. 1965. Phylogenetic systematics. Ann. Rev. Entomol.10:97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 263 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffstetter, R. 1958. Xenarthra, pp. 535–636. In J. Piveteau, ed., Traite de Paléontologie, Vol. 6(2).Google Scholar
  31. Hoffstetter, R. 1970. Radiation initiale des mammifères placentaires et biogéographie. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. D270:3027–3030.Google Scholar
  32. Hoffstetter, R. 1973. Origine, compréhension et signification des taxons de rang supérieur: quelques enseignements tirés de l’histoire des mammifères. Ann. Paléont.59(2): 137–169.Google Scholar
  33. Hopson, J. 1970. The classification of non-therian mammals. J. Mammal.51(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huxley, T. H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proc. Zool. Soc. London1880:649–662.Google Scholar
  35. Jenkins, F. A., Jr. 1974. Tree Shrew locomotion and the origins of primate arborealism, pp. 85–115. In F. A. Jenkins Jr., ed., Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Kavanaugh, D. H. 1972. Hennig’s principles and methods of phylogenetic systematics. The Biologist, 54(3): 115–127.Google Scholar
  37. Kermack, D. M., K. A. Kermack, and F. Mussett. 1968. The Welsh pantothere, Kuehneotherium praecursoris. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.)47:407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kermack, K. A., F. Mussett, and H. W. Rigney. 1973. The lower jaw of Morganucodon. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.)53(2): 87–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1969. Preliminary data on the Upper Cretaceous eutherian mammals from Bayn Dzak, Gobi Desert. Palaeontol. Pol.1969(19–1968): 171–191.Google Scholar
  40. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1971. Skull structure and affinities of the Multituberculata. Palaeontol. Pol.1971(25): 5–41.Google Scholar
  41. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1975a (in press). Evolution of the therian mammals in the late Cretaceous of Asia. Part I. Deltatheridiidae. Results of the Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions, Part VI. Palaeontol. Pol.Google Scholar
  42. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 19756 (in press). Preliminary description of two new eutherian genera from the late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Results of the Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions, Part VI. Palaeontol. Pol.Google Scholar
  43. Kühne, W. G. 1968. Kimeridge mammals and their bearing on the phylogeny of the Mammalia, pp. 109–123. In E. T. Drake, ed., Evolution and Environment, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  44. Lillegraven, J. A. 1969. Latest Cretaceous mammals of upper part of Edmonton Formation of Alberta, Canada, and review of marsupial-placental dichotomy of mammalian evolution. Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contrib. art.50(vert. 12): 1–122.Google Scholar
  45. Lillegraven, J. A. 1975 (in press). Biological considerations of the marsupial-placental dichotomy. Evolution.Google Scholar
  46. MacIntyre, G. T. 1967. Foramen pseudovale and quasi-mammals. Evolution21(4): 834–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacIntyre, G. T. 1972. The trisulcate petrosal pattern of mammals, pp. 275–303. In T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds., Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Matthew, W. D. 1913. A zalambdodont insectivore from the basal Eocene. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.32(17): 307–314.Google Scholar
  49. Matthew, W. D. 1918. Insectivora (continued), Glires, Edentata, pp. 565–657. In W. D. Matthew and W. Granger, A revision of the lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas, Part 5. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.38(16).Google Scholar
  50. Mayr, E. 1974. Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionforsch.12(2):98–128.Google Scholar
  51. McDowell, S. B., Jr. 1958. The greater Antillean insectivores. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.115(3): 113–214.Google Scholar
  52. McKenna, M. C. 1961a. A note on the origin of rodents. Am. Mus. Novit.2037:1–5.Google Scholar
  53. McKenna, M. C. 1961b. On the shoulder girdle of the mammalian subclass Allotheria. Am. Mus. Novit.2066: 1–27.Google Scholar
  54. McKenna, M. C. 1963. New evidence against tupaioid affinities of the mammalian family Anagalidae. Am. Mus. Novit.2158:1–16.Google Scholar
  55. McKenna, M. C. 1966. Paleontology and the origin of the Primates. Folia Primatol.4(1): 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McKenna, M. C. 1969. The origin and early differentiation of therian mammals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.167(1): 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McKenna, M. C. 1972. Was Europe connected directly to North America prior to the middle Eocene? pp. 179–188. In T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds., Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  58. McKenna, M. C., J. S. Mellett, and F. S. Szalay. 1971. Relationships of the Cretaceous mammal Deltatheridium. J. Paleontal.45(3): 441–442.Google Scholar
  59. Mills, J. R. E. 1964. The dentitions of Peramus and Amphitherium. Proc. Linn. Soc. London175(2): 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Osborn, H. F. 1893. Fossil mammals of the upper Cretaceous beds. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.5(17): 311–330.Google Scholar
  61. Parrington, F. R. 1971. On the upper Triassic mammals. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B261:231–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Patterson, B. 1956. Early Cretaceous mammals and the evolution of mammalian molar teeth. Fieldiana: Geol.13(1): 1–105.Google Scholar
  63. Patterson, B. 1965. The fossil elephant shrews (family Macroscelididae). Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.133(6): 297–335.Google Scholar
  64. Popper, K. R. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd ed., Harper and Row, Torchbook, New York. (Translation by the author of the original German edition, Vienna, 1934.)Google Scholar
  65. Robinson, P. 1963. Fused cervical vertebrae from the Bridger Formation (Eocene) of Wyoming. Univ. Colo. Stud., Ser. Geol.1:6–9.Google Scholar
  66. Saban, R. 1954. Phylogénie des Insectivores. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., Paris, Ser. 226:419–432.Google Scholar
  67. Schaeffer, B., M. K. Hecht, and N. Eldredge. 1972. Phylogeny and paleontology, pp. 31–46. In T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds., Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 6, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Schmidt-Kittler, N. 1973. Dimyloides-Neufunde aus der oberoligozänen Spalterfüllung “Ehrenstein 4” (Süddeutschland) und die systematische Stellung der Dimyliden (Insectívora, Mammalia). Mitt. Bayer. Staatssaml. Palaeontol. Hist. Geol.13:115–139.Google Scholar
  69. Simpson, G. G. 1931a. A new classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.59(5): 259–293.Google Scholar
  70. Simpson, G. G. 1931b. A new insectivore from the Oligocene, Ulan Gochu Horizon, of Mongolia. Am. Mus. Novit.505:1–22.Google Scholar
  71. Simpson, G. G. 1936. Studies of the earliest mammalian dentitions. Dent. Cosmos1936:1–24.Google Scholar
  72. Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.85:i–xvi, 1–350.Google Scholar
  73. Slaughter, B. H. 1971. Mid-Cretaceous (Albian) therians of the Butler Farm local fauna, Texas, pp. 131–143. In D. M. Kermack and K. A. Kermack, eds., Early Mammals. Supp. 1, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 50.Google Scholar
  74. Sloan, R. E., and L. Van Valen. 1965. Cretaceous mammals from Montana. Science148(3667): 220–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sulimski, A. 1969. Paleocene genus Pseudictops Matthew, Granger, and Simpson, 1929, (Mammalia) and its revision. Palaeontol. Pol.1969(19–1968): 101–129.Google Scholar
  76. Sych, L. 1971. Mixodontia, a new order of mammals from the Paleocene of Mongolia. Palaeontol. Pol.1971(25): 147–158.Google Scholar
  77. Szalay, F. S. 1969a. The Hapalodectinae and a phylogeny of the Mesonychidae (Mammalia, Condylarthra). Am. Mus. Novit.2361:1–26.Google Scholar
  78. Szalay, F. S. 1969b. Origin and evolution of function of the mesonychid condylarth feeding mechanism. Evolution23(4): 703–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Szalay, F. S. 1972. Cranial morphology of the early Tertiary Phenacolemur and its bearing on primate phylogeny. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.36(1): 59–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Szalay, F. S., and R. L. Decker. 1974. Origins, evolution, and function of the tarsus in Late Cretaceous Eutheria and Paleocene primates, pp. 223–259. In F. A. Jenkins, Jr., ed., Primate Locomotion, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  81. Szalay, F. S., and M. C. McKenna. 1971. Beginning of the Age of Mammals in Asia; the late Paleocene Gashato fauna, Mongolia. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.144:269–318.Google Scholar
  82. Van Valen, L. 1964. A possible origin for rabbits. Evolution18(3): 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Valen, L. 1966. Deltatheridia, a new order of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.132(1): 1–126.Google Scholar
  84. Van Valen, L. 1974. Deltatheridium and marsupials. Nature248(5444): 165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wood, A. E. 1962. Early Tertiary rodents of the family Paramyidae. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc.52(1): 1–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zittel, K. A. 1893. Handbuch der Palaeontologie. I. Abt. Palaeozoologie, Bd. IV, Mammalia, pp. i–xi, 1–799, R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm C. McKenna
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Vertebrate PaleontologyThe American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations