Regulation of Cell Division in Aging Mouse Mammary Epithelium

  • Charles W. Daniel
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 83)

Abstract

The subject of cellular aging is a matter of considerable importance in comtemporary biology. The characteristics and parameters of these aging processes, as well as the mechanisms which underlie them, are currently investigated by a variety of techniques. At present the most widely used methodology is that of continuous cell culture, in which normal diploid tissue cells, even though provided with every known requirement and stimulus, for growth, nevertheless display an inevitable decline in proliferative capacity, followed by senescent changes and eventual loss of the culture.

Keywords

Mammary Epithelium Mammary Duct Maximum Life Span Mammary Aging Ductal Elongation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cristofalo, V. J. and B. B. Sharf. Exp. Cell Res.76: 419 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grobstein, C. J. Exp. Zool. 114: 359 (1950).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harrison, D. E. Nature New Biol. 237: 220 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrison, D. E. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3184 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krohn, P. L. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 157: 128 (1962).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krohn, P. L. In: Topics of the Biology of Aging. (Ed.) P. L. Krohn, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1966) p. 125.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krohn, L. P. Personal communication (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siminovitch, L., J. E. Till, and E. A. McCulloch. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 64: 23 (1964).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Till, J. E. and E. A. McCulloch. Radiat. Res. 14: 213 (1961).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cudkowicz, G., A. C. Upton, and G. M. Shearer. Nature 201: 165 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williamson, A. R. and B. A. Askonas. Nature 238: 337 (1972).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeOme, K. B., L. J. Faulkin, H. A. Bern, and P. B. Blair. Cancer Res. 19: 515 (1959).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoshino, K. J. Nat. Can. Inst. 30: 585 (1963).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniel, C. W., K. B. DeOme, J. T. Young, P. B. Blair, and L. J. Faulkin. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 61: 53 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bresciani, F. Cell Tissue Kinet. l.: 51 (1968).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faulkin, L. J., Jr., and K. B. DeOme. J. Nat. Can. Inst. 24: 953 (1960).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daniel, C. W. and L. J. T. Young. Exp. Cell Res. 65: 27 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dell’Oreo, R. T., J. G. Mertens, and P. F. Kruse, Jr. Exp. Cell Res. 77: 356 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McHale, J. S., M. L. Mouton, and J. T. McHale. Exp. Geront. 6: 89 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young, L. J. T., D. Medina, K. B. DeOme, and C. W. Daniel. Exp. Geront. 6: 49 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin, G. M., C. A. Sprague, and C. J. Epstein. Lab. Invest. 23: 86 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daniel, C. W., B. D. Aidells, D. Medina, and L. J. Faulkin, Jr. FASEB. In press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Daniel, C. W. Experientia 29: 1422 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Daniel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSantz CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations