The Impact of Rape

  • Elaine Hilberman
Part of the Women in Context book series (WICO)

Abstract

Any really useful discussion of rape must begin with an exploration of the meaning of rape, because empathic treatment of rape victims is contingent on one’s comprehension of the meaning of the crime. The profound impact of the rape stress must be understood in the context of a crime against the person and not against the hymen. Bard and Ellison1 remind us that victims of violent crimes in general frequently experience a life crisis which goes unrecognized. Burglary, for example, is experienced as a violation of the self in that one’s home and possessions are symbolic extensions of the self. Armed robbery intensifies the stress by the added dimension of an encounter between victim and criminal. The self-violation is thus compounded by a forced deprivation of independence and autonomy, in which the victim surrenders his/her controls under the threat of violence. An actual physical assault in addition to the robbery further stresses the victim for whom the injury to the body (or envelope of the self) serves as concrete evidence of the coercive surrender of autonomy. Rape, then, becomes the “ultimate violation of the self”1 short of homicide, with invasion of one’s inner and most private space, as well as the loss of autonomy and control. In this schema, it becomes irrelevant to differentiate vaginal from oral or anal violation; it is the self and not an orifice that has been invaded. Thus, for the virgin, the prostitute, the housewife, and the lesbian, the core meaning of rape is the same.

Keywords

Criminal Justice System Violent Crime Rape Victim Federal Bureau Uniform Crime Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bard M, Ellison K: Crisis intervention and investigation of forcible rape. The Police Chief 41 (5)68–73, May 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evrard J: Rape: the medical, social and legal implications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 111(2):197–199, September 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Report of the public safety committee task force on rape. Subcommittee of the District of Columbia City Council. City Hall, 14 and E Streets, N.W., Room 507, Washington, D.C., July 1973.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norman MT, Nadelson CC: The rape victim: psychodynamic considerations. American Journal of Psychiatry 133(4):409–413, April 1976.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hilberman E: The rape victim. New York, American Psychiatric Association Basic Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Largen MA: A report on rape in the suburbs. Northern Virginia Chapter of National Organization for Women, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raleigh News and Observer. March 22, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hibey RA: The trial of a rape case: an advocate’s analysis of corroboration, consent, and character, in Rape victimology. Edited by Schultz LG. Springfield, I11., Charles C Thomas, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Connell N, Wilson C (eds.): Rape: the first sourcebook for women. New York, New American Library, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guttmacher M, Weinhofen H: Psychiatry and the law. New York, Norton, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rape and its victims a report for citizens, health facilities, and criminal justice agencies. Prepared by Center for Women Policy Studies, Washington, D.C., April, 1975. The report consists of four separate handbooks: (a) The police response ,(b) The response of medical facilities ,(c) The response of prosecutor’s offices ,and (d) The re sponse of citizen’s action groups. Copies are available from Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, 666 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffin S: Rape: the all-American crime. Ramparts ,20:26–35, September 1971.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amir M: Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burgess AW, Holmstrom LL: Coping behavior of the rape victim. American Journal of Psychiatry 133(4):413–418, April 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheppard DI, Farmer DJ: Operation rape reduction: summary and recommendations of the national rape reduction workshop. Denver Anti-Crime Council, 1313 Tremont Place, Suite #5, Denver, Colorado 80204, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Groth AN, Burgess AW: Rape: a sexual deviation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 47(3):400–406, July 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brownmiller S: Against our will: men, women and rape. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metzger D: It is always the woman who is raped. American Journal of Psychiatry 233(4)405–408, April 1976.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uniform Crime Reports for the United States. Prepared by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C, 1972 and 1974.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giacinti TA, Tjaden C: The crime of rape in Denver. Prepared for the Denver High Impact Anti-Crime Program. Denver Anti-Crime Council, 1313 Tremont Place, Suite #5, Denver, Colorado 80,204, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnston JD Jr, Knapp CL: Sex discrimination by law: a study in judicial perspective. New York University Law Review 46(4): 704–705, October 1971.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gates MJ: The rape victim on trial. Presented at Special Session on Rape, American Psychiatric Association, Anaheim, California, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Bar Association Journal 61:464-65, April 1975.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wood PL: The victim in a forcible rape case: a feminist view, in Rape victimology. Edited by Schultz LG. Springfield, LLL, Charles C Thomas, 1975.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sutherland S, Scherl D: Patterns of response among victims of rape. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 40(3):503–ll, April 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Burgess AW, Holmstrom LL: The rape victim in the emergency ward. American Journal of Nursing 73(10):1740–1745, October 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burgess AW, Holmstrom LL: Rape trauma syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry 232(9):981–86 September 1974.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burgess AW, Homstrom LL: Rape: victims of crisis. Bowie, Maryland, Robert J Brady, 1974.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hilberman E: Unpublished case reports.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nadelson CC, Hilberman E: Personal communication.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Katan A: Children who were raped, in Psychoanalytic study of the child ,Vol 28. Edited by Eissler R, Ford A, Kris M, Solnit AJ. Yale University Press, 1973, p 208.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Metzger D: Skin: shadows-silence. West Coast Poetry Review, Reno, Nevada, 1976.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Massey JB, Garcia CR, Emich JP: Management of sexually assaulted females. Obstetrics and Gynecology 38(l):29–36 ,July 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Suspected rape. ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 14, July, 1970 (revised, April 1972).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCombie SL, Bassuck E, Savitz R, Pell S: Development of a medical center rape crisis intervention program. American Journal of Psychiatry 133(4):418–421, April 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hayman CR, Lanza C: Sexual assault on women and girls. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 109(3):480–486, February 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wasserman M: Rape: breaking the silence. The Progressive 37:19–23, November 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine Hilberman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations