Threshold Photoneutrons and Photon Doorways

  • B. L. Berman
  • C. D. Bowman
  • R. J. Baglan

Abstract

It has long been recognized that the measurement of photonuclear cross sections with an energy resolution as fine as that obtained heretofore only for neutron cross sections would be a powerful probe for investigating the properties of nuclear states. This would bring to bear the electromagnetic selection rules as a spectroscopic tool, and open for investigation all the stable nuclei not accessible to neutron-induced reactions. This goal now has been accomplished, for the first MeV or so above the (γ,n) threshold, by the threshold photoneutron technique.1 In this experiment, bremsstrahlung from a pulsed, nearly monoenergetic electron beam is directed at the sample under study. The neutrons ejected in the (γ,n) reaction are detected and their energy is measured by the neutron time-of-flight technique. The energy of the electron beam is adjusted so that the tip of the bremsstrahlung spectrum barely exceeds the (γ,n) threshold of the sample. Then neutron transitions from levels of the compound nucleus to excited states of the residual nucleus cannot take place — only ground state transitions are energetically possible. Thus a measure of the neutron energy uniquely determines the energy of the photon which induced the reaction.

Keywords

Neutron Energy Giant Resonance Neutron Cross Section Bremsstrahlung Spectrum Neutron Energy Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Bertozzi, C. P. Sargent, and W. Turchinetz, Phys. Letters 6,108 (1963); B. L. Berman, G. S. Sidhu, and C. D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 76l (1966); C. D. Bowman, G. S. Sidhu, and B. L. Berman, Phys. Rev. 163, 941 (1967); C. D. Bowman, B. L. Berman, and H. E, Jackson, Phys. Rev. 178, 1827 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Van Hemert, C. D. Bowman, R. J. Baglan, and B. L. Berman, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 89, 263 (1970); R. L. Van Hemert, Ph.D. Thesis, UCRL-50501, 1968 (unpublished); R. J. Baglan, Ph.D. Thesis, UCRL-50902, 1970 (unpublished).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. J. Baglan, C. D. Bowman, and B. L. Berman, Phys. Rev. C 3, 672 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R, J. Baglan, C. D. Bowman, and B. L. Berman, Phys. Rev. C 3, 2475 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. Farrell, G. C. Kyker, Jr., E. G. Bilpuch, and H. W. Newson, Phys. Letters 17, 286 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. D. Bowman, E. G. Bilpuch, and H. W. Newson, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 319 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. D. Bowman, R. J. Baglan, B. L. Berman, and T. W. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1302 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. G. Bilpuch, private communication.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. S. Weiss, private communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. L. Berman, R. J. Baglan, and C. D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 319 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. D. Bowman, R. J. Baglan, and B. L. Berman, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 796 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. L. Berman, R. L. Van Hemert, and C. D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. 163, 958 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. L. Berman, R. L. Van Hemert, and C. D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 386 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. L. Berman
    • 1
  • C. D. Bowman
    • 1
  • R. J. Baglan
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations