Advertisement

Mimicry in Plants

  • Delbert Wiens
Part of the Evolutionary Biology book series (EBIO, volume 11)

Abstract

Mimetic phenomena have played a central role in many evolutionary questions and today provide some of the best examples of natural selection. Since its discovery by Bates (1862) in Amazonian Heliconiid butterflies many hundreds of papers have been written on the subject and today it is recognized as a major feature of animal evolution, especially in insects.

Keywords

Pitcher Plant Chemical Mimicry Orchid Flower Batesian Mimicry Insectivorous Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, 1958, Plant Science Catalog, Botany Subject Index 8:8023–8024, Microphotography Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Atsatt, P., and O’Dowd, D., 1976, Plant defense guilds, Science 193: 24–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, H., 1976, “Mistake” pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to the Caricaceae, in: Tropical Trees: Variation, Breeding and Conservation, Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. No. 2 (J. Burley and B. T. Styles, eds.), pp. 161–169, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bally, P. R. O., 1962, Miscellaneous notes on the flora of tropical east Africa including descriptions of new taxa, 8, Candollea 18: 335–357.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow, B., and Wiens, D., 1977, Host—parasite resemblance in Australian mistletoes: The case for cryptic mimicry, Evolution 31: 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, H., 1862, Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley, Lepidoptera: Heliconidae, Trans. Linn. Soc. (Gond.) 23: 495–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, L., 1969, The Cacti of Arizona, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  8. Benson, W., 1977, On the supposed spectrum between Batesian and Müllerian mimicry, Evolution 31: 454–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson, W., Brown, K., Jr., and Gilbert, L., 1976, Coevolution of plants and herbivores: Passion flower butterflies, Evolution 29: 659–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bequaert, J., 1921, On the dispersal by flies of the spores of certain mosses of the family Splachnaceae, Bryologist 14: 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. Britton, N., and Rose, J., 1919, The Cactaceae I, Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ Google Scholar
  12. Brower, J. van Z., 1960, Experimental studies of mimicry. IV. The reactions of starlings to different proportions of models and mimics, Am. Nat 94: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J., and Lieberman, G., 1972, Woodrats and cholla: Dependence of a small mammal population on the density of cacti, Ecology 53: 310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunken, J., de Wet, J. M. J., and Harlan, J., 1977, The morphology and domestication of pearl millet, Econ. Bot 31: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burchell, W. J., 1822, Travels in the Interior of Southern Africa, Vol. 1, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orne, and Brown, London.Google Scholar
  16. Cahn, M., and Harper, J., 1976, The biology of the leaf mark polymorphism in Trifolium repens L. 2. Evidence for the selection of leaf marks by rumen fistulated sheep, Heredity 37: 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, J., and Meeuse, B., 1971, Production of free indole by some aroids, Acta Bot. Neerl 20: 627–635.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, G., and Dickson, C., 1971, Life Histories of the South African Lycaenid Butterflies: The Entomological Work of G. C. Clark and C. G. C. Dickson, Purnell and Sons, Capetown.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, E., 1932, Pollination of Diuris pedunculata, Victorian Nat. 49: 179–186.Google Scholar
  20. Cott, H., 1940, Adaptive Coloration in Animals, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  21. Crum, H., 1976, Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest, rev. ed., University Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  22. Dahlgren, R., 1971, Multiple similarity of leaves between two general Cape plants, Cliffortia L. (Rosaceae) and Aspalanthus L. (Fabaceae), Bot. Not 124: 292–304.Google Scholar
  23. Dodson, C., 1962, The importance of pollination in the evolution of the orchids of tropical America, Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 31:525–534, 641–649, 731–735.Google Scholar
  24. Dodson, C., 1975, Coevolution of orchids and bees, in: Coevolution of Animals and Plants ( L. Gilbert and P. Raven, eds.), pp. 91–99, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  25. Dodson, C., and Frymire, G., 1961, Natural pollination of orchids, Missouri Bot. Gard. Bull 49: 133–152.Google Scholar
  26. Dressler, R., 1968, Pollination by Euglossine bees, Evolution 22: 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drummond, J., 1840, Swan River Journal, Hook. J. Bot 2: 343–372.Google Scholar
  28. Edmunds, M., 1974, Defense in Animals: A Survey of Anti-predator Defenses, Longman, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  29. Ehrlich, P., and Raven, P., 1964, Butterflies and plants: A study of coevolution, Evolution 18: 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erlanson, C., 1930, The attraction of carrion flies to Tetraplodon by an odoriferous secretion of the hypophysis, Bryologist 33: 13–14.Google Scholar
  31. Faegri, K., and van der Pijl, L., 1971, Principles of Pollination Ecology, 2nd ed., Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Fisher, R., 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Ford, E., 1971, Ecological Genetics, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  33. Fordham, F., 1946, Pollination of Calochilus campestris, Victorian Nat. 62: 199–201.Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert, L., 1975, Ecological consequences of a coevolved mutualism between butterflies and plants, in: Coevolution of Animals and Plants ( L. Gilbert and P. Raven, eds.), pp. 210–240, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  35. Glass, C., and Foster, R., 1971, Mexico logbook, Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 43: 197–203.Google Scholar
  36. Glass, C., and Foster, R., 1974, Ariocarpus—living rock cactus, Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 46: 172–174.Google Scholar
  37. Goss, G., and Adams, R., 1976, The reproductive biology of the epiphytic orchids of Florida. IV. Sexually selective attraction of moths to the floral fragrance of Epidendrum anceps Jacquin, Am. Orchid Soc. Bull 45: 997–1001.Google Scholar
  38. Grant, K., 1966, A hypothesis concerning the prevalence of red coloration in California hummingbird flowers, Am. Nat 100: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gunn, C., 1969, Abrus precatorius A deadly gift, Gard. J (Jan.-Feb.):2–5.Google Scholar
  40. Harper, J., 1977, Population Biology of Plants, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Harper, J., Lovell, P., and Moore, K., 1970, The shapes and sizes of seeds, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 1: 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heinrich, B., 1975, Bee flowers: A hypothesis on flower variety and blooming times, Evolution 29: 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hemsley, W. B., 1896, Some remarkable phanerogamous parasites, J. Linn. Soc. London Bot 31: 306–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huheey, J., 1976, Studies in warning coloration and mimicry. VII. Evolutionary consequences of Batesian-Müllerian spectrum: A model for Müllerian mimicry, Evolution 30: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hutchinson, J., 1946, A Botanist in Southern Africa, P. R. Cawthorn Ltd., London. Jacobson, M., and Beroza, M., 1963, Chemical insect attractants, Science 140: 1367–1373.Google Scholar
  46. Janzen, D., 1971, Seed predation by animals, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 2: 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones, D., and Gray, B., 1974, The pollination of Calochilus holtzei F. Muell., Am. Orchid Soc. Bull 43: 604–606.Google Scholar
  48. Kalachevska, K., 1929, The mimicry of weeds, Acad. Sci. Ukraine, Kieff. Bull. Cl. Sci. Phys. Math 4: 67–71 (English abstract in Biol. Abstr. 4:25–26, 1930).Google Scholar
  49. Kerr, W., and Lopez, C., 1963, Biologia da reproducâo de Trigona (Plebeia) Droryana F. Smith, Rev. Bras. Biol 22: 335–341.Google Scholar
  50. Kingsbury, J., 1964, Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  51. Kullenberg, B., 1961, Studies in Ophrys pollination, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 34: 1–340.Google Scholar
  52. Lavranos, J., 1967, Notes on the succulent flora of southern Arabia (with descriptions of new taxa), Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 39: 1–7.Google Scholar
  53. Lavranos, J., 1971, Notes on the succulent flora of northeast Africa and southern Arabia. II. New species of Stapelieae from the Somali Republic, Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 43: 60–67.Google Scholar
  54. Levin, D., 1973, The role of trichomes in plant defense, Q. Rev. Biol 48: 3 - I5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levin, D., 1976, The chemical defenses of plants to pathogens and herbivores, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 7: 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Macior, L., 1971, Coevolution of plants and animals—systematic insights from plant-insect interactions, Taxon 20: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marloth, R., 1929, Stone-shaped plants, S. Afr. Biol. Soc 6: 1–8.Google Scholar
  58. McKey, D., 1975, The ecology of coevolved seed dispersal systems, in: Coevolution of Animals and Plants ( L. Gilbert and P. Raven, eds.), pp. 159–191, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  59. Mertens, R., 1966, Das Problem der Mimikry bei Korallenschlangen, Zool. Jb. Syst 84: 541–576.Google Scholar
  60. Miles, D., Kokpol, U., Bhattacharyya, J., Atwood, J., Stone, K., Bryson, T., and Wilson, C., 1976, Structure of Sarracenin, an unusual enol diacetal monoterpene from the insectivorous plant Sarracenia flava, J. Am. Chem. Soc 98: 1569–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mitich, L., and Bruhn, J., 1977, The genus Ariocarpus—a bibliography, Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 49: 122–127.Google Scholar
  62. Moore, R., 1962, Evolution, Life Nature Library, Time, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  63. Müller, F., 1878, Uber die Vortheide der Mimikry bei Schmetterlingen, Zool. Anz. 1: 54–55.Google Scholar
  64. Otte, D., 1974, Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pennell, F., 1948, Taxonomic significance of an understanding of floral evolution, Brittonia 6: 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Poulton, E. B., 1890, The Colours of Animals, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, London.Google Scholar
  67. Proctor, M., and Yeo, P., 1972, The Pollination of Flowers, Taplinger Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
  68. Purpus, J., 1914, Mimikry bei Kakteen, Mueller’s Deutsche Garten-Zeitung 29: 73–78.Google Scholar
  69. Ridley, H., 1930, The Dispersal of Plants throughout the World, L. Reeve and Co., Ashford, Kent.Google Scholar
  70. Robertson, C., 1887, Fertilization of Calopogon parviflorus, Bot. Gaz. Chicago 12: 288–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson, M., 1969, Defenses against visually hunting predators, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 3 ( T. Dobzhansky, M. Hecht, and W. Steere, eds.), pp. 225–257, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Rothschild, M., 1975, Remarks on carotenoids in the evolution of signals, in: Coevolution of Animals and Plants ( L. Gilbert and P. Raven, eds.), pp. 20–50, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  73. Rowlands, D., 1959, A case of mimicry in plants-Vicia sativa L. in lentil crops, Genetica 30: 435–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Savile, D., 1976, Evolution of the rust fungi (Uredinales) as reflected by their ecological problems, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 9 ( T. Dobzhansky, M. Hecht, and W. Steere, eds.), pp. 137–207, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schelpe, E., 1966, An Introduction to the South African Orchids, McDonald, London. Schwantes, G., 1957, Flowering Stones and Mid-Day Flowers, (trans. by Vera Higgins), Ernest Benn Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  76. Shaw, F., and Bose, R., 1928, Studies in Indian pulses. L Lentil (Ervum lens, Linn.), Mem. Dep. Agric. India Bot. Ser. 16: 159–189.Google Scholar
  77. Sheppard, P., and Turner, J., 1977, The existence of Müllerian mimicry, Evolution 31: 452–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sherzer, W., 1896, Pebble mimicry in Philippine Island beans, Bot. Gaz. Chicago 21: 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, B., and Meeuse, B., 1966, Production of volatile amines and skatole at anthesis in some arum lilies, Plant Physiol. 41: 343–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stansfield, W. D., 1977, The Science of Evolution, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. Stebbins, G. L., Jr., 1950, Variation and Evolution in Plants, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  81. Stebbins, G. L., Jr., 1971, Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. II. Seeds and seedlings, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Steere, W., 1958, Evolution and speciation in mosses, Am. Nat. 92: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stephens, G., and North, B., 1974, Biology, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Stoutamire, W. P., 1974, Australian terrestrial orchids, thynnid wasps and pseudocopulation, Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 73: 13–18.Google Scholar
  85. Stoutamire, W. P., 1975, Pseudocopulation in Australian terrestrial orchids, Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 74: 226–229.Google Scholar
  86. Tippo, O., and Stern, W., 1977, Humanistic Botany, W. W. Norton and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  87. Tyson, B., Dement, W., and Mooney, H., 1974, Volatilization of terpenes from Salvia mellifera, Nature 252: 119–120.Google Scholar
  88. van der Pijl, L., 1969, Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van der Pijl, L., and Dodson, C., 1966, Orchid Flowers: Their Pollination and Evolution; University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida.Google Scholar
  90. van Someren, V., and Jackson, T., 1959, Some comments on protective resemblance amongst African Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera), J. Lepid. Soc 13: 121–150.Google Scholar
  91. Vane-Wright, R., 1976, A unified classification of mimetic resemblances, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 8: 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Watson, I., 1961, Tongue-orchids and ichneumonids, Victorian Nat. 78: 32–35.Google Scholar
  93. Wickler, W., 1968, Mimicry in Plants and Animals, (trans. by R. D. Martin), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  94. Wiens, D., 1978, Viscaceae, in: Flora of Southern Africa (in press).Google Scholar
  95. Wilson, V. J., and Clarke, J. E., 1962, Observations on the common duiker Sylvicarpa grim-mia Linn., based on material collected from a tsetse control game elimination scheme, Proc. Zool. Soc. London 138: 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Woodruff, D., and Benson, L., 1976, Changes of status in Sclerocactus, Cactus and Succulent J. (U.S.) 48: 131–134.Google Scholar
  97. Yeo, P., 1968, The evolutionary significance of the speciation of Euphrasia in Europe, Evolution 22: 736–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zaret, T., 1977, Inhibition of cannibalism in Cichla ocellaris and hypothesis of predator mimicry among South American fishes, Evolution 31: 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Delbert Wiens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations