Advertisement

Relaxation and Diastolic Distensibility of the Regionally Ischemic Left Ventricle

  • William Grossman

Abstract

Normal left ventricular contraction and relaxation are dependent upon an appropriate balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand. In the clinical setting, myocardial ischemia is commonly associated with left ventricular dysfunction. It has been observed by many investigators that a transient, reversible rise in left ventricular diastolic pressure commonly accompanies angina pectoris [1–4]. This increase in diastolic pressure could be due simply to an increase in diastolic volume, resulting from contractile failure of ischemic myocardium and an increased residual volume. Alternatively, the increased diastolic pressure might reflect decreased diastolic distensibility of the left ventricular chamber, with a higher diastolic pressure being needed to achieve the same degree of end-diastolic sarcomere stretch. These potential mechanisms for the increased diastolic pressure that characterizes angina pectoria are illustrated in Figure 20-1. The rise in diastolic pressure seen in patients with angina pectoris has been studied extensively by clinical investigators [5–14], and there is now widespread agreement that the phenomenon results from both decreased left ventricular diastolic distensibility and impaired contractile function. As shown by Sasayama and coworkers [9], the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship curve shifts upward and slightly to the right during angina pectoris. This shift apparently represents a direct upward shift of the pressure-segment length relationship for ischemic myocardium and a rightward or Frank-Starling shift for the remaining nonischemic myocardium (Figure 20-2).

Keywords

Angina Pectoris Diastolic Pressure Coronary Stenos Diastolic Stiffness Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grossman W (1985). Why is the left ventricular diastolic pressure increased during angina pectoris? J Am Coll Cardiol 5: 607–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muller O, Rorvik K (1958). Hemodynamic consequences of coronary heart disease with observations during anginal pain and on the effect of nitroglycerin. Br Heart J 20: 302–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parker JD, DiGiogi S, West RO (1966). A hemodynamic study of acute coronary insufficiency precipitated by exercise: With observations on the effect of nitroglycerin. Am J Cardiol 17: 470–483.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Brien KP, Higgs LM, Glancy DL, Epstein SE (1969). Hemodynamic accompaniments of angina: A comparison during angina induced by exercise and by atrial pacing. Circulation 39: 735–743.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dwyer EM Jr (1970). Left ventricular pressure-volume alterations and regional disorders of contraction during myocardial ischemia induced by atrial pacing. Circulation 42: 1111–1122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLaurin LP, Rolett EL, Grossman W (1973). Impaired left ventricular relaxation during pacing induced ischemia. Am J Cardiol 32: 75 2757.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barry WH, Brooker JZ, Alderman EL, Harrison DC (1974). Changes in diastolic stiffness and tone of the left ventricle during angina pectoris. Circulation 49: 255–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mann T, Brodie BR, Grossman W, McLaurin LP (1977). Effect of angina on the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship. Circulation 55: 761–766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sasayama S. Nonogi H, Miyazaki S, et al (1985). Changes of diastolic properties of the regional myocardium during pacing-induced ischemia in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 5: 599–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorell BH, Turi Z, Grossman W (1981). Modification of left ventricular response to pacing tachycardia by nifedipine in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Med 71: 667–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bourdillon PD, Lorell BH, Mirsky I, et al (1983). Increased regional myocardial stiffness of the left ventricle during pacing-induced angina in man. Circulation 67: 316–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carroll JD, Hess OM, Hirzel HO, Krayenbuehl HP (1983). Exercise-induced ischemia: The influence of altered relaxation on early diastolic pressures. Circulation 67: 521–527.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll JD, Hess OM, Hirzel HO, et al (1985). Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in coronary artery disease: effects of revascularization on exercise-induced ischemia. Circulation 72: 119–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCans JL, Parker JO (1973). Left ventricular pressure-volume relationships during myocardial ischemia in man. Circulation 48: 775–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aroesty JM, McKay RG, Heller GV, et al (1985). Simultaneous assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction during pacing-induced ischemia. Circulation 71: 889–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Serizawa T, Carabello BA, Grossman W (1980). Effect of pacing-induced ischemia on left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in dogs with coronary stenoses. Circ Res 46: 430439.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paulus WJ, Serizawa T, Grossman W (1982). Altered left ventricular diastolic properties during pacing-induced ischemia in dogs with coronary stenosis: Potentiation by caffeine. Circ Res 50: 218–227.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Momomura SI, Bradley AB, Grossman W (1984). Left ventricular diastolic pressure-segment length relations and end-diastolic distensibility in dogs with coronary stenoses: An angina physiology model. Circ Res 55: 203–214.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paulus WJ, Grossman W, Serizawa T, et al (1985). Different effects of two types of ischemia on regional left ventricular systolic and diastolic function.. Am J Physiol 248: H719 - H728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Momomura SI, Ingwall J, Parker JA, et al (1985). The relationships of high energy phosphates, tissue pH and regional blood flow to diastolic distensibility in the ischemic dog myocardium. Circ Res 57: 822–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourdillon PD, Paulus WJ, Seizawa T, Grossman W (1986). Effects of verapamil on regional myocardial diastolic function in pacing-induced ischemia in dogs. Am J Physiol 251: H834 - H840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forrester JS, Diamond G, Parmley WW, Swan HJC (1972). Early increase in left ventricular compliance after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 51: 598–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tyberg JV, Forrester JS, Wyatt HL, et al (1974). An analysis of segmental ischemic dysfunction utilizing the pressure-length loop. Circulation 49: 748–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palacios I, Johnson RA, Newell JB, Powell WJ Jr (1976). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-volume relation with experimental acute global ischemia. Circulation 53: 428–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogel WM, Apstein CS, Briggs LL, et al (1982). Acute alterations in left ventricular diastolic chamber stiffness. Role of the “erectile” effect of coronary arterial pressure and flow in normal and damaged hearts. Circ Res 51: 465–478.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bricknell OL, Daries PS, Opie LH (1981). A relationship between adenosine triphosphate, glycolysis and ischemic contracture in isolated rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 13: 941–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Apstein CS, Deckelbaum L, Hagopian L, Hood WB (1978). Acute cardiac ischemia and reperfusion: Contractility, relaxation and glycolysis. Am J Physiol 235: H637–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Grossman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations