Advertisement

Suction Conditions and Limitations on Suction Performance

  • Igor J. Karassik
  • Terry McGuire

Abstract

Every piece of machinery is preordained to have its Achilles’ heel. That of the centrifugal pump can generally be found in its suction. This fact must have been discovered quite early in the commercial application of centrifugal pumps and, probably, accepted as an inescapable penalty exacted in return for the advantages that were made available by this newer means of raising water to a desired location at a reasonable cost. And because most centrifugal pump troubles occur on the suction side of the pump, it is imperative to understand how to relate the suction capability of a centrifugal pump to the suction characteristics of the system in which it will operate.

Keywords

Centrifugal Pump Suction Side Cavitation Erosion Total Head Pump Suction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [19.1]
    ANSI/HI 1.6, 1994, Centrifugal Pump Test, Hydraulic Institute, Parsippany, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  2. [19.2]
    Robert R. Ross, Theoretical Predictions of Net Positive Suction Head Required (NPSHR) for Cavitation Free Operation of Centrifugal Pumps, United Centrifugal Pumps, San Jose, USA. [or similar paper by Johnson that preceded this].Google Scholar
  3. [19.3]
    E. Grist, Net Positive Suction Head Requirements for Avoidance of Unacceptable Cavitation Erosion in Centrifugal Pumps, I. Mech. E Paper C163/74, London, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. [19.4]
    D.J. Vlaming, A Method for Estimating the Net Positive Suction Head Required by Centrifugal Pumps, ASME Paper No. 81-WA/FE-32, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. [19.5]
    P. Cooper and F. Antunes, Cavitation Damage in Boiler Feed Pumps, Symposium Proceedings: Power Plant Pumps—The State of the Art, EPRI CS-3158, July 1983, pp. 2–24 to 2–49.Google Scholar
  6. [19.6]
    B. Schiavello, Visual Study of Cavitation-An Engineering Tool to Improve Pump Reliability, EPRI 1st International Conference on Improved Coal Fired Power Plants, Palo Alto, Califomia, November 19–21,1986.Google Scholar
  7. [19.7]
    J.H. Doolin, Judge Relative Cavitation Peril with Aid of These 8 Factors, Power Magazine, pp. 77–80, October 1986.Google Scholar
  8. [19.8]
    J.F. Gulich and S. Pace, Quantitative Prediction of Cavitation Erosion in Centrifugal Pumps, Proc. of the 13th IAHR Symposium on Progress in Technology, Montreal, Canada, September 1986, Paper #42.Google Scholar
  9. [19.9]
    B. Schiavello and M.R. Prescott, Field Cases Due to Various Cavitation Damage Mechanisms: Analysis and Solutions, Porch. EPROM Symposium: Power Plant Pumps, June 1991, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor J. Karassik
    • 1
  • Terry McGuire
    • 1
  1. 1.Ingersoll-Dressor Pump CompanyUSA

Personalised recommendations