Advertisement

Radiation and Asbestos Fibers: Interaction and Possible Mechanism

  • Tom K. Hei
  • Steve Kushner

Abstract

The association between exposure to asbestos fibers and the development of bronchogenic carcinoma of the lung and diffuse mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum have been well established in both man (1,2) and experimental animals (3,4). Furthermore, cigarette smoking can enhance the incidence of lung cancers in asbestos workers in a synergistic fashion. (5). It is not known for certain whether specific chemicals or the high LET α-irradiation from deposited polonium is the important factor in carcinogenesis by cigarettes and its enhancement by asbestos. Previous studies from this laboratory have found that asbestos fibers, at a concentraction which itself was Ineffective in inducing oncogenic transformation in vitro did potentiate the oncogenicity of low LET ionizing radiation in a supra-additive fashion (6,7). Furthermore, leaching the fibers with acid to remove any possible chemical contaminants did not diminish their ability to enhance the oncogenic transforming potential of radiation (7). These results suggest that the mere physical presence of the fibers is crucial for the observed radiation-fiber interaction.

Keywords

Asbestos Exposure Bronchogenic Carcinoma Oncogenic Transformation Absorb Dose Rate Asbestos Fiber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.C. Barum, and R.D. Truan, An epidemiological study of lung cancer in asbestos miners. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med. 17, 634–637. (1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.C. Wagner, C.A. Sleggs, and P. Marchand, Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the Northwestern Cape Province. Br. J. Ind. Med, 17, 260–271. (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Wagner, and G. Berry, Mesothelioma in rats following inoculation with asbestos. Br. J. Cancer, 23, 567–581 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Gross, R.T.P. DcTredelle, E. Tolker, M. Kaschak, and M.A. Babyak, Experimental asbestosis: The development of lung cancer in rats with pulmonary deposits of chrysotile asbestos dust. Arch. Environ. Health 15, 343–355 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I.J. Selikoff, E.C. Hammond, and J. Churg, Asbestos exposure, smoking and neoplasia J. Am. Med. Assoc. 204, 104–110 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.K. Hei, E.J. Hall, and R. Osmak, Asbestos, radiation and oncogenic transformation. Br. J. Cancer 50, 717–720 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.K. Hei, C.R. Geard, R. Osmak and M. Travlsano, Correlation of in vitro genotoxicity and oncogenicity induced by radiation and asbestos fibers. Br. J. Cancer 52, 591–597 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.F. Stanton, M. Layard, and A. Tegeris, Carcinogenicity of fibrous glass: pleural response in the rat in relation to fiber dimension. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58, 587–604 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.L. Kaw, D.H. Zaidi, In vitro studies in the cytotoxic action of different varieties of asbestos dusts on macrophages. Acta. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 225–235 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Miller, R.I.M. Handfield, and E. Kagan, E. The effects of different mineral dusts on the mechanism of phagocytosis: A scanning electron microscope study. Environ. Res. 15, 139–154 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.J. Beck, Interaction between fibrous dust and cells in vitro. Ann. Anat. Pathol. 21, 227–236 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Hansen, and B.T. Mossman, Generation of superoxide from alveoler macrophages exposed to asbestiforms and non-fibrous particles. Cancer Res. 47, 1681–1686 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.A. Goodglick, and A.B. Kane, Role of reactive oxygen metabolites in crocidolite asbestos toxicities to mouse macrophages. Cancer Res. 46 5558–5566 (1987).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.A. Reznlkoff, J.S. Bertram, D.W. Brankow, and C. Heldelberger, Quantitative & qualitative studies of chemical transformation of clonal C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to post confluence inhibition of cell division. Cancer Res. 33, 3239–3249 (1973).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.J. Wade, L.E. Lipkin, and A.L. Frank, Studies of in vitro asbestos cell interaction. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 2, 1029–1039 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.C. Miller, R. Osmak, M. Zimmerman, and E.J. Hall, Sensitizers, protectors and oncogenic transformation in vitro. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 8, 771–776 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom K. Hei
    • 1
  • Steve Kushner
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiological Research Laboratory, College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations