Advertisement

Aggregation Rules in Committee Procedures

Chapter

Abstract

Very often, decision procedures in a committee compensate potential manipulations by taking into account the ordered profile of qualifications. It is therefore rejected the standard assumption of an underlying associative binary connective allowing the evaluation of arbitrary finite sequences of items by means of a one-by-one sequential process. In this paper we develop a mathematical approach for non-associative connectives allowing a sequential definition by means of binary fuzzy connectives. It will be then stressed that a connective rule should be understood as a consistent sequence of binary connective operators. Committees should previously decide about which connective rule they will be condidering, not just about a single operator.

Keywords

Fuzzy Connectives Fuzzy Sets Aggregation Operators 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson and R.R. Rivest Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1990).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    V. Cutello and J. Montero. Recursive families of OWA operators. In: P.P. Bonissone, Ed., Proceedings of the Third IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems. IEEE Press, Piscataway (1994); pp. 1137–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    V. Cutello and J. Montero. Hierarchical aggregation of OWA operators: basic measures and related computational problems. Uncertainty, Fuzzi-ness and Knowledge-Based Systems 3:17–26 (1995).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    V. Cutello and J. Montero. The computational problems of using OWA operators. In: B. Bouchon-Meunier, R.R. Yager and L.A. Zadeh, Eds., Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing. World Scientific, Singapore (1995); pp. 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    V. Cutello and J. Montero. Information and aggregation: ethical and computational issues. In: D. Ruan, Ed., Fuzzy Sets Theory and Advanced Mathematical Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1995); pp. 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J.C. Fodor, J.L. Marichal and M. Roubens. Characterization of the ordered weighted averaging operators. Institut de Mathematique, Université de Liège, Prépublication 93.011.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. J. Klir and T.A. Folger. Fuzzy sets, Uncertainty and Information. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1988).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    T.C. Koopmans. Representation of preference ordering with independent components of consumption. In: C.B. McGuire and R. Radner, Eds., Decision and Organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1972), 57–78 (2nd edition by the University of Minnesota Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    K.T. Mak. Coherent continuous systems and the generalized functional equation of associativity. Mathematics of Operations Research, 12:597–625 (1987).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Montero. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions in a non-homogeneous group. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 25:15–20 (1988).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Montero, J. Tejada and V. Cutello. A general model for deriving preference structures from data. European Journal Of Operational Research, to appear.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.R. Yager. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18:183–190 (1988).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.R. Yager. Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 59:125–148 (1993).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.R. Yager. MAM and MOM operators for aggregation. Information Sciences, 69:259–273 (1993).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.R. Yager. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67:129–145 (1994).MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MathematicsComplutense UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations