Cryocoolers 9 pp 935-942 | Cite as
Stirling Cooler Magnetic Interference Measured by a High-Tc SQUID Mounted on the Cold Tip
Abstract
Small Stirling-type cryocoolers are available on the market mainly for cooling infrared detectors, but they can also be used to cool high-Tc superconducting devices, like SQUIDs. Because SQUIDs are extremely sensitive magnetic sensors it is questionable whether these devices can be mounted directly on the cold tip of the cooler. To investigate this we attached a high-Tc SQUID to the tip of a representative split Stirling-cycle cryocooler (Signaal Usfa type 7058), and operated it in a magnetically shielded room.
The SQUID that we used for our test experiments was one of the first high-Tc SQUIDs that were manufactured in our group and had a noise level of 0.7 pT/√Hz at about 77 K. With the SQUID attached to the tip of the cold head and the cooler running, the noise appeared to have increased dramatically: at the driving frequency of 50 Hz and at the harmonics by roughly 5.105, and at other frequencies by about a factor 103. The experiments indicated that the noise coupled into the SQUID was dominated by contributions originating from the cold head, and not by compressor interference. The experiments are discussed, and the consequences with respect to the cooling of SQUIDs with standard cryocoolers are briefly considered.
Keywords
Magnetic Dipole Moment Noise Contribution Cold Finger Cold Head Measured Noise LevelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Walker, G., Bingham, E.R., Low-capacity Cryogenic Refrigeration: Monographs on Cryogenics, Clarendon Pres, Oxford (1994).Google Scholar
- 2.Rogalla, H., “Superconducting electronics”, Cryogenics, vol. 34 (ICEC suppl.) pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
- 3.Khare, N., Chaudhari, P., “Operation of bicrystal junction high-Tc direct current-SQUID in a portable microcooler”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, no. 18 (1994), pp. 2353–2355.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Khare, N., National Physical Laboratory, New Dehli, India, private communication.Google Scholar
- 5.Hilgenkamp, J.W.M., High-Tc dc SQUID Magnetometers, PhD thesis, University of Twent, Enschede (NL), 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.Verbeek, D., Heimonds, H., Roos, P., “Performance of the Signaal Usfa Stirling cooling engines”, Cryocoolers 7, Santa Fe (1992), pp. 728–737.Google Scholar
- 7.Ter Brake, H.J.M., Van den Bosch, P.J., Holland, H.J., “Magnetic noise of small Stirling coolers”, Adv. Cryog. Eng., vol. 39B (1994), pp. 1287–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ter Brake, H.J.M., Huonker, R., Rogalla, H., “New results in active noise compensation for magnetically shielded rooms”, Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 4 (1993), pp. 1370–1375.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.R.H. Koch et al., “Effects of radio frequency radiation on the dc SQUID”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, no. 1(1994), pp. 100–102.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Verberne, J.F.C., Bruins, P.C., Van den Bosch, P.J., Ter Brake, H.J.M., “Reduction of the vibrations generated by Stirling cryocoolers for cooling a high Tc SQUID magnetometer”, Cryocoolers 8, Plenum Press, New York (1995), pp. 465–474.Google Scholar
- 11.Van den Bosch, P.J., Ter Brake, H.J.M., Holland, HJ., De Boer, H.A., Verberne, J.F.C., Rogalla, H., “Cryogenic design of a high-Tc SQUID-based heart scanner cooled by small Stirling cryocoolers”, submitted to Cryogenics. Google Scholar