Dual Effect of Propranolol on the Human Platelet Activation by Thrombin: Potentiation of Free Intracellular Ca2+ Mobilization and Inhibition of Phospholipase D Activity

  • Stanislav I. Svetlov
  • Donald J. Hanahan
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 400)

Abstract

Propranolol has been employed for a long time in clinical practice as non selective β-adrenoreceptor antagonist. Only the S(−) optical isomer has β-blocking activity, whereas R(+) form is totally ineffective. Early clinical observations (1978–1979) showed that treatment with propranolol improved blood platelet function in patients with cardiovascular diseases. In vitro studies indicated that this compound inhibited human PRP aggregation following exposure to ADP, collagen, epinephrine and Ca2+ ionophore A23187, and diminished aggregation of washed human platelets induced by a low concentration (0.025 U/ml) of thrombin (1). Both S(−) and R (+) isomers as well as (±) racemic form were active. Further studies evaluated the inhibitory effect of propranolol on phosphatidic acid (PA) phosphohydrolase, which converts PA to diacylglycerol in various type of cells (2). It was found that inhibition of PA phosphohydrolase by propranolol led to potentiation of 02 production in neutrophils stimulated with putative receptor agonist fMLP, suggesting a role for PA as a second messenger and for PA phosphohydrolase as a key regulatory enzyme in the interaction between PLC and PLD in the signal transduction (3,4). Sozzani et al., showed recently (5), that both S(−) and R(+) form inhibited protein kinase C (PKC) from human neutrophils and reduced [3H]PDBu binding by neutrophils in the concentration range of 100–200 μM.

Keywords

Phosphatidic Acid Human Platelet Phosphatidic Acid Platelet Suspension Racemic Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weksler, B.B., Gillick, M. and Pink, J. Blood 49:185–196, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koul, O. and Hauser, G. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 253:453–461, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agwu, D.E., NcPhail, L.C., Sozzani, S., Bass, D.A. and McCall, C.E. J. Clin. Invest. 88:531–539, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gay, J.C. and Murray, J.J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1095:236–242, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sozzani, S., Agwu, D.E., McCall, C.E., O’Flaherty, J.T., Schmitt, J.D., Kent, J.D. and McPhail, L.C. J. Biol. Chem. 267:20481–20488, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rittenhouse, S.E. and Sasson, J.P. J. Biol. Chem. 260:8657–8660, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geanacopoulos, M., Turner, J., Bowling, K.E., Vandenberg, S.R. and Gear, A.R.L. Thrombosis Res. 69:113–124, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tate, B.F. and Rittenhouse, S.E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1178:281–285, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubin, R. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 156:1090–1096, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ekholm, J., Tatsumi, Y., Nouchi, T. and Hanahan, D.J. Anal. Biochem, 204:79–84, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thompson, N.T., Bonser, R.W. and Garland, CG. Trends in Pharmacol. Sci. 12:404–408, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conricode, K.M., Brewer, K.A. and Exton, J.H. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7199–7202, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baidassare, J.J., Henderson, P.A., Burns, D., Loomis, C. and Fisher, G. J. Biol. Chem. 267:15585–15590, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislav I. Svetlov
    • 1
  • Donald J. Hanahan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryThe University of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations